- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You missed the entire point of the OP's lawsuit. It was not simply against the free use of the issued tag's opinion, it was against not having any equal opportunity to counter it. The state legislature accpted stating one political viewpoint (via state issued tags) and rejected the stating of the opposing political viewpoint (via state issued tags).
The point is glaringly obvious but why find the need to counter "Choose Life"? What's so bad about that?
Those who find an innocuous couple of words like "Choose Life" offensive, and go to court about it, should choose a more productive life themselves.