- Joined
- Aug 19, 2012
- Messages
- 4,905
- Reaction score
- 1,578
- Location
- The darkside of the moon
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
They cannot be drunk or stoned at work, which is the consequence of smoking pot or drinking. You do not get un-drunk or un-stoned as soon as your break is over.
If they are stoned or drunk at the job, those jobs can't be very important. This is a good example of why Detroit is in the position it is today.
Well, they could not have been terribly drunk or stoned as both are pretty obvious. You are trying to claim you get drunk off a beer or two, or even massively stoned off a joint and it lasts for hours. Really, I am a lighweight drinker. I am still pretty functional after a beer or two. Also, I did not see much proof offered aside from people claiming it was a joint or whatever. Even if it were a joint **** weed is not going to get you terribly high at all. Still, it doesn't last forever anyway and they clearly were not overly drunk or stoned as a supervisor could have clearly noted. You are making a huge issue over very little. Just the ideas you have that the moment you have a little to drink you are drunk, or even a toke off a joint will get you stoned shows you are relying on drug propaganda and BS for your opinions.
The reason why these guys are back is because there is no proof they were drunk or stoned while working, and that the effects of any drinking clearly did not effect their performance. This is why you should not rely on interpretation and innuendo by faux news and might want to sdeal with some facts before your knee jerk reactions to union stories wrap around and show how overreactionary you really are.