Here is the problem I have with what you posted..... Your source, and let me explain why. Your source, Daniel Halper of the Weekly Standard, is lying through his teeth. let me explain further. Halper pulls the number $168 out of his ass and expects us to believe it. OK, so the number being presented for one day seems reasonable, and high enough to piss off people who don't think independently. However, lets use the same number, represented in a different way. There are 365 days in a year, so multiply that 168 bucks per day by the number of days in the year, and you get something that is not to be believed. The amount?
$61,320.00
So Daniel Halper of the Weekly Standard expects everybody to believe that welfare recipients receive $61,320.00 in money, subsidies, and benefits? This makes Halper's article laughable on it's face, which is one reason that the Weekly Standard is not a good source at all. It is biased as hell.
Let me ask you another question. If, say, the Daily Kos came out with their own article which says that welfare recipients make only pennies a day, and need more government money, would you believe that? Of course you wouldn't. Nobody with an education above the sixth grade would believe it. But you are attempting to use an article that is just as biased, only hard right instead of hard left, to make your point. And in that, you have failed to make your point, at least, not to those of us who can see through the BS that is in the article, and the author's fabrication of what he has the unmitigated gall to call facts.
Let me put this another, much shorter, way............. $61,320.00 a year, my ass!!