• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

‘Fiscal Cliff’ Could Put Millions of Taxpayers Into ‘AMT Shock’ [W:66]

With the Republican "counter offer" now out it is quite clear that they have no intention of clarifying anything. Their revenue from "closing loopholes" doesn't specify which loopholes would be closed and their proposed cuts simply don't add up. They're continuing to obfuscate.

Do you consider the Presidents offer including increased spending, and no guaranteed cuts, plus the abdication of congress to oversee the debt celling increases as serious?
 
Do you consider the Presidents offer including increased spending, and no guaranteed cuts, plus the abdication of congress to oversee the debt celling increases as serious?

I would say that this question is tangential.

The relevant fact, and one that you cannot get around, is that Obama, serious or not, offered up an actual proposal. The Republicans have not.
 
Back
Top Bottom