• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

President's backers, rivals clash in egypt

j-mac

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
41,104
Reaction score
12,202
Location
South Carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
CAIRO (AP) -- Opponents of President Mohammed Morsi have set fire to offices of his Muslim Brotherhood in several Egyptian cities, clashing with his supporters after the Islamist leader assumed sweeping new powers.

snip

The clashes came a day after Morsi announced sweeping new powers for himself, putting himself above judicial oversight.

News from The Associated Press



The world has been suckered.....Way to go. Now instead of a dictator that would uphold the peace with Israel, we have one that will pay lip service, while supporting Hamas.
 
The world has been suckered.....Way to go. Now instead of a dictator that would uphold the peace with Israel, we have one that will pay lip service, while supporting Hamas.

But putting aside the supporting of Hamas thing, which the article does not allude to by the way.

The question I always have to ask far right wingers like you is what should have been done instead?

And specifically what should Obama have done instead because that's where you're really going with all this, if Egypt ends up doing something you don't like, you'll blame Obama for having "helped" oust Mubarak...

I mean what was he suppose to do?

Send troops in to guard the Presidential Palace?

Carpet bomb the protesters?

I mean there's this almost arrogant presumption that you're able to control any event you like outside the US including a President being dumped by the sheer force and will of his own people.
 
But putting aside the supporting of Hamas thing, which the article does not allude to by the way.

The question I always have to ask far right wingers like you is what should have been done instead?

And specifically what should Obama have done instead because that's where you're really going with all this, if Egypt ends up doing something you don't like, you'll blame Obama for having "helped" oust Mubarak...

I mean what was he suppose to do?

Send troops in to guard the Presidential Palace?

Carpet bomb the protesters?

I mean there's this almost arrogant presumption that you're able to control any event you like outside the US including a President being dumped by the sheer force and will of his own people.

Very simply, recall the ambassador and staff. Remove all US Government personnel from the country. Remove their ambassador and personnel from the United States, and suggest that no US Citizens travel to Egypt. Essentially cut off all official contact with the country.
 
This development is par for Egypt's post-WW II experience. Egypt has had leaders with strong powers, regardless of their overall ideologies. On account of its history, institutions, and its regional role, it is no accident that such leaders have ultimately consolidated significant power.

Egypt, despite its rhetoric on the recent Israel-Hamas conflict, played a constructive role. It confiscated arms that were being smuggled to the Gaza Strip. It took the lead on mediating a ceasefire. It did not waver on maintaining its bilateral peace treaty with Israel. All said, its approach did not undercut U.S. interests or those of key regional U.S. allies. Hence, the U.S. should not take any measures in response to this political development in Egypt.
 
If the POTUS had called him up and said you have my blessing to get tough with the protestors instead of saying to the press you must go, then we may have had a very different outcome than the Muslim Brotherhood ruling Egypt.

As for Morsi giving himself more power, that is pretty par for the course in modern Egyptian history.
 
The world has been suckered.....Way to go. Now instead of a dictator that would uphold the peace with Israel, we have one that will pay lip service, while supporting Hamas.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton meets Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood president Mohammed Morsi in historic first - Telegraph

Pulling out of Iraq, getting rid of Qaddafi, major problems in Libya, congratulating the Muslim Brotherhood, refusing to meet with Benjamin Netanyahu, and only giving lip service while Israel is being attacked, should raise a few questions about Obama's competence and/or where his sympathies lie.
 
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton meets Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood president Mohammed Morsi in historic first - Telegraph

Pulling out of Iraq, getting rid of Qaddafi, major problems in Libya, congratulating the Muslim Brotherhood, refusing to meet with Benjamin Netanyahu, and only giving lip service while Israel is being attacked, should raise a few questions about Obama's competence and/or where his sympathies lie.

The question is clear, and I think he has all but actually spoken his answer. I think it is clear by just watching what is said, and what isn't....For instance, Hamas has been spraying southern Israel with indiscriminate bombs, thousands of them for quite some time, targeting civilians purposely. Israel showing great restraint does not take action, but when they do, they are painted, and admonished to use restraint as if they are the aggressor....

Let's say the US and Mexico had similar questions as Isreal, like say the Meecha Movement. And let's say that MeeCha was the official government of Mexico, and wanted the SW US back. Would we put up with MeeCha firing rockets at US citizens across the borders?
 
The question is clear, and I think he has all but actually spoken his answer. I think it is clear by just watching what is said, and what isn't....For instance, Hamas has been spraying southern Israel with indiscriminate bombs, thousands of them for quite some time, targeting civilians purposely. Israel showing great restraint does not take action, but when they do, they are painted, and admonished to use restraint as if they are the aggressor....

Let's say the US and Mexico had similar questions as Isreal, like say the Meecha Movement. And let's say that MeeCha was the official government of Mexico, and wanted the SW US back. Would we put up with MeeCha firing rockets at US citizens across the borders?

It seems that we are entering conspiracy theory territory here but, as you say, the evidence would appear to point in that direction. This becomes even more credible after his removing the missile defense shield in Europe and his promise to be "more flexible" with Putin after this past election. His background, or what we know about it, does nothing to ease any suspicions of the man.
 
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton meets Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood president Mohammed Morsi in historic first - Telegraph

Pulling out of Iraq, getting rid of Qaddafi, major problems in Libya, congratulating the Muslim Brotherhood, refusing to meet with Benjamin Netanyahu, and only giving lip service while Israel is being attacked, should raise a few questions about Obama's competence and/or where his sympathies lie.


We tried to tell the liberals that Obama was a Muslim from Kenya, but they wouldn't believe us.
 
It seems that we are entering conspiracy theory territory here but, as you say, the evidence would appear to point in that direction. This becomes even more credible after his removing the missile defense shield in Europe and his promise to be "more flexible" with Putin after this past election. His background, or what we know about it, does nothing to ease any suspicions of the man.


Unfortunately, we are condemned to watch, and react after the fact, frightened into submission to the Alinsky tactic of labels from the now in power progressive scourge.
 
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton meets Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood president Mohammed Morsi in historic first - Telegraph

Pulling out of Iraq

getting rid of Qaddafi


and only giving lip service while Israel is being attacked
Just why would exiting that boondoggle in short order be viewed in a negative light?

Qaddafi was ousted in large part due to pressures from within his own country, and the support of the international community, which widely recognized him as an unstable and treacherous kook. In addition to his support for terrorist groups over the years, he also met those who dared protest his rule in his latter days with threats of genocide. How did you manage to miss all of that?

PressTV - Obama promises more military aid to Israel
 
Just why would exiting that boondoggle in short order be viewed in a negative light?

It leaves a power vacuum which the Muslim Brotherhood will fill.

Qaddafi was ousted in large part due to pressures from within his own country, and the support of the international community, which widely recognized him as an unstable and treacherous kook.

But do you know what or who will replace Qaddafi? We have already seen Americans murdered over there, including the US Ambassador, with no explanation from Obama. There will not be a response to those murders and the Libyan government had to know what was going on.

In addition to his support for terrorist groups over the years, he also met those who dared protest his rule in his latter days with threats of genocide. How did you manage to miss all of that?

I had and have no use for Qadaffi but, in recent years, he could be handled. Can the present and future regime be handled? I certainly don't know, but I doubt it.

Obama will make promises to everyone. Do you still believe him?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom