- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,710
- Reaction score
- 35,488
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I'll help you get started a bit to highlight that "sections" of the Patriot Act are not some magical myth that don't actually exist.
Here's section 802, detailing the new definition for Domestic Terrorist
As to "warrantless wiretapping", I believe yo'ure confusing "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists" that was passed and initially allowed Bush to have the NSA doing warrantless wiretaps. Reportedly in 2007 the warrantless action was ended and sent back to the FISA courts. Later, in 2008, FISA itself was amended to loosen restrictions in terms of that kind of survelliance. So that's an issue that isn't PATRIOT's problem.
Now, perhaps you're mixing up some of the other provisions of Patriot itself with warrantless wiretapping. Perhaps the "roving wiretaps" that had people upset. I'll help you with that too, here's section 206
That's the one that allows them to essentially get a warrant on a person, rather than a specific phone, for wiretapping purposes. It still requires a warrant to place the initial taps on phones, but the issue people (rightfully) have is that some of those phones are ones routinely used by others outside of the person that caused the warrant to be issued.
There, I've given you some head starts here in trying to find the sections backing up your assertions. You can take it from here and find yourself some actual evidence to back up your claims now that I've shown you that, yes, the Patriot Act does include actual sections people can reference.
Here's section 802, detailing the new definition for Domestic Terrorist
SEC. 802. DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
(a) DOMESTIC TERRORISM DEFINED- Section 2331 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)(B)(iii), by striking `by assassination or kidnapping' and inserting `by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping';
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking `and';
(3) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and inserting `; and'; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
`(5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that--
`(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
`(B) appear to be intended--
`(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
`(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
`(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
`(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.'.
Link
As to "warrantless wiretapping", I believe yo'ure confusing "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists" that was passed and initially allowed Bush to have the NSA doing warrantless wiretaps. Reportedly in 2007 the warrantless action was ended and sent back to the FISA courts. Later, in 2008, FISA itself was amended to loosen restrictions in terms of that kind of survelliance. So that's an issue that isn't PATRIOT's problem.
Now, perhaps you're mixing up some of the other provisions of Patriot itself with warrantless wiretapping. Perhaps the "roving wiretaps" that had people upset. I'll help you with that too, here's section 206
SEC. 206. ROVING SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY UNDER THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978.
Section 105(c)(2)(B) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1805(c)(2)(B)) is amended by inserting `, or in circumstances where the Court finds that the actions of the target of the application may have the effect of thwarting the identification of a specified person, such other persons,' after `specified person'.
Link
That's the one that allows them to essentially get a warrant on a person, rather than a specific phone, for wiretapping purposes. It still requires a warrant to place the initial taps on phones, but the issue people (rightfully) have is that some of those phones are ones routinely used by others outside of the person that caused the warrant to be issued.
There, I've given you some head starts here in trying to find the sections backing up your assertions. You can take it from here and find yourself some actual evidence to back up your claims now that I've shown you that, yes, the Patriot Act does include actual sections people can reference.