• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Alleged "Innocence of Muslims Flim Director Taken in for Questioning.....

As well as identity theft.. He was expressly forbidden from using alias and phony names.
I am glad he's going back to prison.. I consider him a traitor.

He's unrepentant and has NO remorse.. Throw the book at him.

Btw, this guy was the director NOT the producer. They're not always the same person in the film business. But you do have a point in his use of the alias in credits - that is evidence he broke the conditions of his parole. But traitor? If you're going to open the definition that much it would indeed also cover our president who seems more interested in mollifying foreign interests than protecting our citizens' rights.
 
A "traitor" to what?



"Remorse" for what?

He intentionally set out to incite violence while our government is trying to cool down the turmoil in the ME. He says so.
 
Btw, this guy was the director NOT the producer. They're not always the same person in the film business. But you do have a point in his use of the alias in credits - that is evidence he broke the conditions of his parole. But traitor? If you're going to open the definition that much it would indeed also cover our president who seems more interested in mollifying foreign interests than protecting our citizens' rights.

Yes he was the writer, director and producer. The actors and actresses have said so... and he also controlled the voice overs .. inserting Mohammed, Mohammed into the film.
 
He intentionally set out to incite violence while our government is trying to cool down the turmoil in the ME. He says so.

He did? Where?

(And where's the law against "inciting violence" in a faraway land, even if it were "intentional"?)
 
Dissuading someone from doing something that helps the muslim extremists cause and results in riots and injuries and more hatred of America is not really in our best interest? Of course it is. Since when do our interests conflict with our freedoms? Something is wrong with that.

That's an interesting interpretation, but the escalation was not on the side of an American. Had he killed 4 people and caused hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage he would not be protected under the first amendment. If you go home and your significant other says something that offends you and you knock the hell out of them it is not their fault you committed assault. Sure you were provoked, but you had a choice to make and breaking the law is on you.
 
Btw, this guy was the director NOT the producer. They're not always the same person in the film business. But you do have a point in his use of the alias in credits - that is evidence he broke the conditions of his parole. But traitor? If you're going to open the definition that much it would indeed also cover our president who seems more interested in mollifying foreign interests than protecting our citizens' rights.

Yes.. I consider him a traitor.. He may hate Muslims... and he may hate Obama, but he knowingly incited violence and got Americans killed who were serving our country oversea.

Maybe its OK with you, but its not OK with me.. I didn't like everything Bush did, but I wouldn't sell out my country.

That's NOT freedom, that's treason.. He should have returned to Egypt.
 
6a00d8341c630a53ef017d3c0e6f14970c-640wi


Just after midnight, authorities descended on the Cerritos home of the man believed to be the filmmaker behind the anti-Muslim movie that has sparked protests and rioting in the Arab world.
Authorities waited until most media had left for the day.

On Friday, U.S. courts spokeswoman Karen Redmond said the Office of Probation in the Central District of California is reviewing whether Nakoula, who was convicted on bank fraud charges, violated terms of his probation in relation to the video and its uploading onto the web.

He had been ordered not to own or use devices with access to the Web without approval from his probation officer -– and any approved computers were to be used for work only. "Defendant shall not access a computer for any other purpose," the terms read.
Restrictions were also placed on him enlisting others to get on the Internet for him.....snip~

Alleged 'Innocence of Muslims' filmmaker taken in for interviewing by deputies - latimes.com


Looks like they will find something to arrest him for. Thoughts? Think this will now affect Freedom of Speech Laws?




Good to know they've caught the ONE GUY who did all the damage and killed the US Ambassador. Can we all say "red herring"? The Obama Admin is scrambling like a bunch of rats trying to get the heat off of their foreign policy, or lack there of, to some guy who, if he had made this film about the Christian religion would have had accolades and laurels tossed at his feet.
 
That's NOT freedom, that's treason.. He should have returned to Egypt.

One guesses you may not be able to recite the actual definition of "treason."

But I'm still waiting for where he said he was trying to incite violence.

(Again, not that there's even a law against it for some faraway land.)
 
Yes he was the writer, director and producer. The actors and actresses have said so... and he also controlled the voice overs .. inserting Mohammed, Mohammed into the film.

The actors would not necessarily know who the producer was/is. The rest is inconsequential to this issue. What flavor of butthole he is to work for or how he lied to his employees doesn't impact this issue.
 
Yes.. I consider him a traitor.. He may hate Muslims... and he may hate Obama, but he knowingly incited violence and got Americans killed who were serving our country oversea.

Maybe its OK with you, but its not OK with me.. I didn't like everything Bush did, but I wouldn't sell out my country.

That's NOT freedom, that's treason.. He should have returned to Egypt.

Whoa there, you're mixing and matching where none exist. Returned to Egypt? Isn't he a citizen here? Why would he need to return to Egypt to exercise his first amendment right? And what got Americans serving overseas killed was a failure in our intel community and a POTUS who doesn't seem to know his ass from his elbow where it comes to American foreign policy.

That embassy should have been armed to the gills and the Ambassador should have never been exposed to that environment. Get him on the evac at the first sign of trouble.

You're still running on the bogus, debunked conclusion the film was the reason behind all this.

Btw, the film was produced by a group called Media for Christ
According to Paul Audley, president of Film LA, which issues filming permits in Los Angeles, a group called Media for Christ was issued a one-day shooting license in August 2011 for a film with the working title ‘Desert Warriors.’

You'll also find evidence at the link that I was wrong about the lack of evidence of breaking conditions of parole - the director admits publishing the film on the internet by himself.
 
Last edited:
As well as identity theft.. He was expressly forbidden from using alias and phony names.
I am glad he's going back to prison.. I consider him a traitor.

He's unrepentant and has NO remorse.. Throw the book at him.

Interesting. I wonder about probable cause. If he broke his probation by posting the video, fine, punish him for the probation violation. But we know that's not why they went looking for him. It may turn out that he didn't post the video, in which case they will find another excuse to jail him.

The interesting thing about this case is that everybody knows the acts worldwide were not caused by this video. Seriously. Even those of you who would argue it was know better and are using this instance to forward another agenda. And those who committed the acts know it has nothing to do with the video. Are we to believe they didn't know what day it was and the significance of it? Further, our government knows it wasn't the video. They are playing CYA and know that their supporters will play along. It's an election year, politics are ugly and divisive, and devout supporters of either side will use any tactic available to win.

Just for a moment let's drop the premise that any of us as individuals have anything to gain by the outcome of this election. If you remove the partisan arguments and remove these incidences from the context of the election the simple fact is that the video is a red herring. You don't have to admit it in text. You know. We all know. Semantics aside, there is not a single one of us here on this forum who have a thing to gain by not holding those who planned and executed these attacks from being held accountable for these actions. If only there was such a thing as honesty in politics...
 
Yes.. I consider him a traitor.. He may hate Muslims... and he may hate Obama, but he knowingly incited violence and got Americans killed who were serving our country oversea.

Maybe its OK with you, but its not OK with me.. I didn't like everything Bush did, but I wouldn't sell out my country.

That's NOT freedom, that's treason.. He should have returned to Egypt.

Considering that this was a planned event, your blaming the violence on the silly film that wouldn't have seen the light of day if not for the fact it provided a convenient excuse for those who share your desre to destroy our way of life, this is just more of your stupid Wahhabist propaganda.
 
Good to know they've caught the ONE GUY who did all the damage and killed the US Ambassador. Can we all say "red herring"? The Obama Admin is scrambling like a bunch of rats trying to get the heat off of their foreign policy, or lack there of, to some guy who, if he had made this film about the Christian religion would have had accolades and laurels tossed at his feet.

:Lol: I was in the process of posting and then came back and saw this post. Seems the "red herring" reference was not mine alone. It seems we've found our "lone gunman".
 
One guesses you may not be able to recite the actual definition of "treason."

The zeal with which he/she promotes the Wabbist agenda to destroy free speech sure comes closer to the definition of treason (providing this is a U.S. citizen) than any who would protect the same right.
 
Again there is no tie to murder with this case.
Man makes film that pisses off radical muslims, this film could be why radical islamic militants attacked our embassy, he also has apparently might of broke his parol. So yes murder could be in this case.

That would be an excuse for the Fed overextending it's jurisdiction.
The whole world is rioting about us because of this film and has made threats and may of attacked our embassy.
 
Man makes film that pisses off radical muslims, this film could be why radical islamic militants attacked our embassy, he also has apparently might of broke his parol. So yes murder could be in this case.


The whole world is rioting about us because of this film and has made threats and may of attacked our embassy.

Absolutely wrong on all counts. There is no depraved indifference here and no murder, and the film isn't why the arab world is rioting.
 
Yup it's too bad we don't have a US foreign policy guru like Romney runn things right now. Some people make it sound like Obama should have this guy over for dinner so they could discuss a sequel. The man is a federal parolee with far less rights than other Americans and his parole officer violated him they don't need show the public evidence of his violations that's part of being on parole.
 
Yup it's too bad we don't have a US foreign policy guru like Romney runn things right now. Some people make it sound like Obama should have this guy over for dinner so they could discuss a sequel. The man is a federal parolee with far less rights than other Americans and his parole officer violated him they don't need show the public evidence of his violations that's part of being on parole.

So? Even if any of that were true, none of it has anything to do with the issue at hand. Why not mention his hair and eye color, just as superfluous.

We get it, you want this guy to be the sacrificial goat for this president's weakness in foreign policy and his blunders here so your guy will get re-elected.
 
If he violated parole this is no issue of free speech. Of course he is only guilty of violating parole not the deaths of those in the embassy.
 
If he violated parole this is no issue of free speech. Of course he is only guilty of violating parole not the deaths of those in the embassy.

I agree where it pertains to him, but, as previously linked, the film was produced by a group, first amendment rights are still an issue.
 
Vance, you're smarter than this. The guy wasn't arrested for insulting Islam. He was detained for violating the terms of his probation, which include not publishing anything on the Internet.
In the immortal words of my grandfather..."why thats just horse**** son...."

He was taken in as a photo op...an appeasement act. Look, Muslims...we have that bad man in custody...now will you please stop rioting?

If he violated some sort of law, why did it take the federal government and several days for them to decide to engage? Bull****. This is all photo ops and politics. Bad politics.
 
So? Even if any of that were true, none of it has anything to do with the issue at hand. Why not mention his hair and eye color, just as superfluous.

We get it, you want this guy to be the sacrificial goat for this president's weakness in foreign policy and his blunders here so your guy will get re-elected.

You're right Obama needs a scapegoat. Okay! Re-elected, since you bring it up we both know your guy will make sure my guy gets re-elected. Blunders.... I wouldn't talk about to much on that side.
 
:Lol: I was in the process of posting and then came back and saw this post. Seems the "red herring" reference was not mine alone. It seems we've found our "lone gunman".



This response by the Obama Admin is just proof that the "college profs" haven't a clue. They read it and taught it, but never really had to apply and no they are finding it isn't so cut and dried in a real world situation. The problem with their lack of experinece and ineptness is America will pay the price for the collective "boobness".
 
Man makes film that pisses off radical muslims, this film could be why radical islamic militants attacked our embassy, he also has apparently might of broke his parol. So yes murder could be in this case.


Might you possible consider writing that in recognizable English?

T.I.A.


I might add, though, that since it is patently obvious that this terrorist attack was planned in advance, your sympathies are quite misplaced.
 
Man makes film that pisses off radical muslims, this film could be why radical islamic militants attacked our embassy, he also has apparently might of broke his parol. So yes murder could be in this case.


The whole world is rioting about us because of this film and has made threats and may of attacked our embassy.

You do know the Fed released him and that he and his family are holed up somepleace safe.....Right? Now that they discovered he was an informer in the PCP Case. Also the terms and conditions of his parole. Was that he was to get a job.

That any jobs dealing with Computers and the internet had to be approved by the Probation Officer. Do you think the feds would release him if they had something on him at the time? Do you think it is possible that the Feds found that he had permission for the job?

Any reason why the Feds didnt pick him up today.....if he had broken the terms and conditions of his probation? Also due to him having all the alias' and knowing actors, and directors change their name for such Endeavors. Do you think his Probation officer would work around that aspect. Especially if the terms are he is to get a job and prove he has one to the court.
 
Back
Top Bottom