OldWorldOrder
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2012
- Messages
- 5,820
- Reaction score
- 1,438
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I still don't understand what the destruction of Mecca is supposed to accomplish.
Never mind this. Why don't you translate your little squigly lines at the bottom of your post. Isn't there a rule for English only? I want to see what your respons is before I ask a mod to review it.Oh please, not again with your silly theories, I don't actually need that poll to know what Egyptians think about this issue, I live there. The fact that there is an american poll that confirms this is a plus. Those 15 year olds polled probably made up the 1 or 2 out of 10 who weren't against this so called aid. You can deny it all you want, it doesn't actually matter.
That would be me.No but you were defending the person I was quoting and responding to originally....He wanted to bomb Mecca.
And this attitude is why, when the history of the downfall of the west is written we will not be the victors.Talking about bombing anything is just stupid. That is NOT going to happen over a handful of morons, sorry.
And this attitude is why, when the history of the downfall of the west is written we will not be the victors.
One really must try to connect all of the dots, even if you disagree with me.
Well, not the whole country. Just the goofy little thing in the center of Mecca that has the natives all agog. A half-dozen well-placed 2,000 lb JDAM should do the trick nicely. Give everybody 20 minutes notice that the rounds are inbound. Suggest that they move a few blocks away.I think people are just upset and venting. Hopefully, people would think twice before actually "bombing" a country over something like this. Really, if we're going to have embassies in places like these, WE should be the ones to make sure that our people there are safe because we can't rely on a third-world country's police force obviously.
And this attitude is why, when the history of the downfall of the west is written we will not be the victors.
One really must try to connect all of the dots, even if you disagree with me.
It is already a war. Only one side has been fighting it for the last 50 or so years and we have failed to take adequate notice. I want to slow Islam down for a thousand years. Maybe in that time they can come to grips with their inner demons and actually become a religion of peace.Well, I'm hopeful that a situation such as this would never denigrate into a war. Wouldn't you? There would be so many more lives lost, and it would be impossible to get rid of all the terrorists. All we can hope to do with that kind of approach is slow them down temporarily, IMO.
Well, not the whole country. Just the goofy little thing in the center of Mecca that has the natives all agog. A half-dozen well-placed 2,000 lb JDAM should do the trick nicely. Give everybody 20 minutes notice that the rounds are inbound. Suggest that they move a few blocks away.
It is already a war. Only one side has been fighting it for the last 50 or so years and we have failed to take adequate notice. I want to slow Islam down for a thousand years. Maybe in that time they can come to grips with their inner demons and actually become a religion of peace.
We can change the climate by destroying their holy places and destroying the mosques the attacks originate from. We can drain large portions of this swamp. It will take time and it will take a robust military with a very great many special operators and human intelligence assets.I don't see that anyone has made any headway in the way we have approached this situation so far. The terrorists just keep coming. They are born and raised into this climate of hatred. It is one generation after another. Like I said, we can slow them down, but we can't stop them all. Too bad we can't just get our people out of these hostile countries and have nothing to do with them. That is the solution I would prefer.
What the heck are you talking about? The downfall of the west? This was a handful of lunatics who attacked a few embassies, and you want to go to war over this? Really? And have more of OUR guys killed, and for what?
I am dropping letters. Fixed.Politely tell them to leave. Then destroy Mecca.
Why do you believe destroying a place will cause millions to die? Do you believe they will all die of heart attacks when their realize there is not god named Allah?
Destroying mecca as the first of a long list of holy places on our **** list will give them something to think about.But...Why?
If it cannot be explained in a paragraph the author probably doesn't understand the problem.I guess you'd have to find out. Rarely is complex policy as simple as a sentence.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1060915272 said:I keep seeing this insane notion that "a handful" of terrorists have attacked US and ally embassies.
Earth to those with their head in the sand, its world wide in at least 23 countries.
I see you have taken the Obama approach to this violence leaving at least 4 Americans dead. Do nothing.
Destroying mecca as the first of a long list of holy places on our **** list will give them something to think about.
If it cannot be explained in a paragraph the author probably doesn't understand the problem.
But it will begin to change their culture of death. And that is worth doing.I can assure you destroying Mecca will NOT suddenly make Muslims into Athiests.
Wow! Where do you stand on the topic of the American Revolution?
Dhimmitude anyone? ("dhimmitude" refers to non-Muslims appeasing and surrendering to Muslims)
I didn't say "I don't see an apology here. I see the statement as being one that is diplomatic and used to stop violence. We, as a nation, should condem efforst to offend believer of all religions. That is not an apology. That is a diplomatic stance".
I thought the statement by the Dhimmi-in-chief was as you described.
We can change the climate by destroying their holy places and destroying the mosques the attacks originate from. We can drain large portions of this swamp. It will take time and it will take a robust military with a very great many special operators and human intelligence assets.
LOL. They are all correct.What the ****? Only one of those adjectives modifying the subject is even close to correct.
War is war. Ask them politely to choose another religion of peace. There are plenty to choose from.Don't you think that would be going against the Constitution? You know, freedom of religion and all that. Sorry, but that is just completely unrealistic and really not a solution at all. Besides, I know you know that MOST Muslims are not violent extremists.