• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anit-American violence sweeps across 23 world nations

I still don't understand what the destruction of Mecca is supposed to accomplish.
 
Oh please, not again with your silly theories, I don't actually need that poll to know what Egyptians think about this issue, I live there. The fact that there is an american poll that confirms this is a plus. Those 15 year olds polled probably made up the 1 or 2 out of 10 who weren't against this so called aid. You can deny it all you want, it doesn't actually matter.
Never mind this. Why don't you translate your little squigly lines at the bottom of your post. Isn't there a rule for English only? I want to see what your respons is before I ask a mod to review it.
 
No but you were defending the person I was quoting and responding to originally....He wanted to bomb Mecca.
That would be me. :)

We need to begin taking away everything the Islamofascists hold dear as they screw up and piss us off. If you have a better idea for the first target I am willing to explore it.
 
Talking about bombing anything is just stupid. That is NOT going to happen over a handful of morons, sorry.
And this attitude is why, when the history of the downfall of the west is written we will not be the victors.

One really must try to connect all of the dots, even if you disagree with me.
 
And this attitude is why, when the history of the downfall of the west is written we will not be the victors.

One really must try to connect all of the dots, even if you disagree with me.

Downfall? What do you think put the West on top?
 
I think people are just upset and venting. Hopefully, people would think twice before actually "bombing" a country over something like this. Really, if we're going to have embassies in places like these, WE should be the ones to make sure that our people there are safe because we can't rely on a third-world country's police force obviously.
Well, not the whole country. Just the goofy little thing in the center of Mecca that has the natives all agog. A half-dozen well-placed 2,000 lb JDAM should do the trick nicely. Give everybody 20 minutes notice that the rounds are inbound. Suggest that they move a few blocks away.
 
[QUOTESo will this world wide spreading violence help Obama rethink his foreign policy strategy? Or is it too late? ][/QUOTE]


For me personally, it's to late. To avoid getting into the some Muslims are good/bad debate in ME/African Countries. I'll just hit the hammer on the nail, and I cannot understand why we would invest tax payer dollars, especially at this point and time to Countries who are very clear about hating us, or in the same breath we cannot trust. Those days must stop.

With Obama in office, the abuse will continue financially. and murdering our own, as he compliments them on the way to the bank with OUR tax dollars - as we bury our own. Obama's Foriegn policies didn't work yesturday, today, and they won't tomorrow.
 
And this attitude is why, when the history of the downfall of the west is written we will not be the victors.

One really must try to connect all of the dots, even if you disagree with me.

What the heck are you talking about? The downfall of the west? This was a handful of lunatics who attacked a few embassies, and you want to go to war over this? Really? And have more of OUR guys killed, and for what?
 
Well, I'm hopeful that a situation such as this would never denigrate into a war. Wouldn't you? There would be so many more lives lost, and it would be impossible to get rid of all the terrorists. All we can hope to do with that kind of approach is slow them down temporarily, IMO.
It is already a war. Only one side has been fighting it for the last 50 or so years and we have failed to take adequate notice. I want to slow Islam down for a thousand years. Maybe in that time they can come to grips with their inner demons and actually become a religion of peace.
 
Well, not the whole country. Just the goofy little thing in the center of Mecca that has the natives all agog. A half-dozen well-placed 2,000 lb JDAM should do the trick nicely. Give everybody 20 minutes notice that the rounds are inbound. Suggest that they move a few blocks away.

For what and why would you want to do that? What the heck would that accomplish?
 
It is already a war. Only one side has been fighting it for the last 50 or so years and we have failed to take adequate notice. I want to slow Islam down for a thousand years. Maybe in that time they can come to grips with their inner demons and actually become a religion of peace.

I'm sorry, but I find your solutions to be quite silly and not "solutions" to the problem at all to say the least. Yeah, let's bomb the religious center of another country. Smart idea! :roll:
 
I don't see that anyone has made any headway in the way we have approached this situation so far. The terrorists just keep coming. They are born and raised into this climate of hatred. It is one generation after another. Like I said, we can slow them down, but we can't stop them all. Too bad we can't just get our people out of these hostile countries and have nothing to do with them. That is the solution I would prefer.
We can change the climate by destroying their holy places and destroying the mosques the attacks originate from. We can drain large portions of this swamp. It will take time and it will take a robust military with a very great many special operators and human intelligence assets.
 
What the heck are you talking about? The downfall of the west? This was a handful of lunatics who attacked a few embassies, and you want to go to war over this? Really? And have more of OUR guys killed, and for what?

I keep seeing this insane notion that "a handful" of terrorists have attacked US and ally embassies.

Earth to those with their head in the sand, its world wide in at least 23 countries.

I see you have taken the Obama approach to this violence leaving at least 4 Americans dead. Do nothing.
 
Politely tell them to leave. Then destroy Mecca.

Why do you believe destroying a place will cause millions to die? Do you believe they will all die of heart attacks when their realize there is not god named Allah?
I am dropping letters. Fixed.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1060915272 said:
I keep seeing this insane notion that "a handful" of terrorists have attacked US and ally embassies.

Earth to those with their head in the sand, its world wide in at least 23 countries.

I see you have taken the Obama approach to this violence leaving at least 4 Americans dead. Do nothing.

Yes, it happened in many countries, but overall it is still a handful. So you are just wrong. This is not like a declaration of war. This out of control extremist citizens, and that is the reality.
 
I can assure you destroying Mecca will NOT suddenly make Muslims into Athiests.
But it will begin to change their culture of death. And that is worth doing.

They need to move away from their gutter religion anyway. I propose a thousand year "time out" where they sit in the corner and leave the civilized adults alone.
 
Wow! Where do you stand on the topic of the American Revolution?
Dhimmitude anyone? ("dhimmitude" refers to non-Muslims appeasing and surrendering to Muslims)

I didn't say "I don't see an apology here. I see the statement as being one that is diplomatic and used to stop violence. We, as a nation, should condem efforst to offend believer of all religions. That is not an apology. That is a diplomatic stance".

I thought the statement by the Dhimmi-in-chief was as you described.
 
We can change the climate by destroying their holy places and destroying the mosques the attacks originate from. We can drain large portions of this swamp. It will take time and it will take a robust military with a very great many special operators and human intelligence assets.

It doesn't matter if you destroy their holy places. That is not where they're born and bred. They are taught at school, at home, and at their mosques. How on earth do you think that will stop terrorism??? You think because their mosque or holy place gets destroyed that they'll just give up on their religious beliefs which have existed for centuries?
 
What the ****? Only one of those adjectives modifying the subject is even close to correct.
LOL. They are all correct.
1) He will be a one term president.
2) His formative years were spent with Marxists, Communists, socialists, radicals, terrorists and progressives. He, himself, in his ghostwritten books says he made a point of seeking out the Marxists and other radicals to hang around with.
3) He asked Putin, the Russian leader and therefore our enemy to give him time since he could be more flexible in giving away our sovereignty after the election.
4) He is the president for a while longer.
 
IMO, these really poor people in the ME are pretty much isolated from the rest of the world, oppressed and abused. Their leaders take advantage of them (and us of course), and then get them to focus their hatred onto us and other western cultures, telling them how it is our fault that they suffer, how we are the "great Satan" etc. They are barely educated if at all, except for in religious beliefs. That is what creates these extremists. Of course, there are many other factors that come into play too.
 
Don't you think that would be going against the Constitution? You know, freedom of religion and all that. Sorry, but that is just completely unrealistic and really not a solution at all. Besides, I know you know that MOST Muslims are not violent extremists.
War is war. Ask them politely to choose another religion of peace. There are plenty to choose from.
 
Back
Top Bottom