• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video [W:100]

and until you posted the NEW link there was ZERO evidence of it and technically there still isnt unless thats the official police statement and not hear say AND we know for a fact his gun only discharged ONCE :D

what if it discharged twice? and we saw the second one?

so tell me the cool line about ignorant again ;) LOL

You asked about what the video proved and in response I said:

"The cop's weapon discharged. In order to explain it the cop claim Dorm assaulted him and tried to take his gun. The video proves Dorm never made a move and was walking when the cop came up behind him and pistol whipped him, accidentally firing at the same time."

You responded by saying the video doesn't prove that. How. I have no freaking clue because it clearly shows the cop hit him when Dorm didn't even raise a single hand.
 
No, the video proves that the gun went off once when the officer struck the kid in the back of the skull. Now this does place DOUBT on the officer's testimony, significant doubt. But if more than one bullet was fired, then it is possible that prior to the video the kid went for the gun and it discharged. If the cop said only 1 round was fired, then yes that absolutely would prove his defense and testimony absolutely false. Was that the claim? If so, then it is assured that these cops did significant wrong doing and should be behind bars.

His gun discharged once. For the 18th freaking time he tried to claim his gun discharged because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. The video clearly proves that did not happen. I think some of you spend so much time trying to pick things apart you can't see some of the most obvious facts.

Dorm was released from jail as soon as the prosecutors saw the tape and a couple of weeks later the cop was charged with second degree assault. It should be attempted murder.
 
There will be lawyers on both sides, and they will all be getting paid. Problem?

Yes. Lawyers that feed off the misery of others are somewhere between cockroaches and maggots.
 
His gun discharged once. For the 18th freaking time he tried to claim his gun discharged because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. The video clearly proves that did not happen. I think some of you spend so much time trying to pick things apart you can't see some of the most obvious facts.

Dorm was released from jail as soon as the prosecutors saw the tape and a couple of weeks later the cop was charged with second degree assault. It should be attempted murder.

I didn't come in at the beginning of the argument. If the gun discharged once and the claim by the cops was that the single discharge occurred when the kid went for it, that absolutely this video proves they are lying. And in that case, not only should the city pay big to these kids, those "cops" should get 30 years in federal pound me up the ass prison.
 
You asked about what the video proved and in response I said:

"The cop's weapon discharged. In order to explain it the cop claim Dorm assaulted him and tried to take his gun. The video proves Dorm never made a move and was walking when the cop came up behind him and pistol whipped him, accidentally firing at the same time."

You responded by saying the video doesn't prove that. How. I have no freaking clue because it clearly shows the cop hit him when Dorm didn't even raise a single hand.

no it doesnt to anybody honest, logical and rational, what happened before the video?
do you know for a fact nothing happened before the video?

LMAO again the video alone doesnt prove/disprove anything yet

it shows the gun go off but what if the official reports form the multiple cops say it went off twice? lol
what if the assault happened before the video?
 
I didn't come in at the beginning of the argument. If the gun discharged once and the claim by the cops was that the single discharge occurred when the kid went for it, that absolutely this video proves they are lying. And in that case, not only should the city pay big to these kids, those "cops" should get 30 years in federal pound me up the ass prison.


LOL
office space movie line NICE!

and I agree
 
His gun discharged once. For the 18th freaking time he tried to claim his gun discharged because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. The video clearly proves that did not happen. I think some of you spend so much time trying to pick things apart you can't see some of the most obvious facts.

Dorm was released from jail as soon as the prosecutors saw the tape and a couple of weeks later the cop was charged with second degree assault. It should be attempted murder.

guess you should make better posts with all the facts then huh?
LOL the problem is WE (the some of us) that you are talking about are only taking things for what is actually being shown here and that is not "obvious" facts based on what you have posted LOL
 
this is how simply it is

I still stand by everything I have said

if you disagree prove anything I said factually wrong with the info you have posted already.

should be simple right since you posted "obvious facts" lol
 
no it doesnt to anybody honest, logical and rational, what happened before the video?
do you know for a fact nothing happened before the video?

LMAO again the video alone doesnt prove/disprove anything yet

it shows the gun go off but what if the official reports form the multiple cops say it went off twice? lol
what if the assault happened before the video?

The cop's gun discharged once.

Read that about twenty five more times but I know you won't because you refuse to admit you made a mistake when you claimed the video did not prove what I said.

That is why I started with the fact:

The cops gun discharged. Any logical rational person would see that as saying it discharged ONCE and especially.......

Never mind.....don't have the patience for your games.
 
this is how simply it is

I still stand by everything I have said

if you disagree prove anything I said factually wrong with the info you have posted already.

should be simple right since you posted "obvious facts" lol

I already did that.

You know and we all know you will never admit your mistake.
 
The cop's gun discharged once.

Read that about twenty five more times but I know you won't because you refuse to admit you made a mistake when you claimed the video did not prove what I said.

That is why I started with the fact:

The cops gun discharged. Any logical rational person would see that as saying it discharged ONCE and especially.......

Never mind.....don't have the patience for your games.

I didnt make any mistake
have you posted any facts that prove his gun only discharged once? and you didnt even say the cop claimed it went off during an assault LOL

you saying you dont have the patience for my games is just away of saying you have no FACTUAL proof :shrug:

im fine with that lol

Ill keep waiting for you to post anything that factually disproves anything I said :D
 
I already did that.

You know and we all know you will never admit your mistake.

no you have not, not ONCE have you done this LMAO

and I ALWAYS admit when I make a mistake, I have made whole posts about when I make a mistake :shrug:

Ill keep waiting for those FACTS, maybe you just dont understand that word?
 
I'm really too disgusted by the racist agenda here so have fun with that.

It looks like you are just begging praying for a way to blame the victim in some way. It is disgusting.
You have got to have a 3rd degree blackbelt in moron to see 'racism' in any of these comments.
 
I'm being callous at the moment so I need to take a break from the board.
 
Like I just posted........but entertain us.......what does the "video" suggest?

You apparently didn't pay attention to the part about a convenience store and his friend in the ski mask and all those mentions.
 
Falsifying records, false imprisonment and giving false testimony would be rather bad too, yes? If what is alleged is true.

We have no way of knowing any of that from a short clip of the officer running up to him and hitting him.
 
We have no way of knowing any of that from a short clip of the officer running up to him and hitting him.

Well if one shot and one shot only was fired, we know the cop is lying.
 
Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video

Well if one shot and one shot only was fired, we know the cop is lying.

That is also a true statement. Obviously the cop didn't mean to discharge his weapon but he DID mean to clock the guy in the dome with his weapon and just happened to have his finger on the trigger. Regardless of what occurred before the video recorded them, he definitely lied about the guy reaching for his gun causing the discharge.
 
Well if one shot and one shot only was fired, we know the cop is lying.

This agree 100%

If only one shot was fired "somebody gots some explainin' to dooooo"

and that explain wont be good enough and he should lose his badge and be prosecuted
 
That is also a true statement. Obviously the cop didn't mean to discharge his weapon but he DID mean to clock the guy in the dome with his weapon and just happened to have his finger on the trigger. Regardless of what occurred before the video recorded them, he definitely lied about the guy reaching for his gun causing the discharge.

that confuses me?
you say that "if" the cops gun only discharged once then yes the cop is lying, which I totally agree

but then you say regardless of what occurred before the video the cop definitely lied?

uhm but IF the gun discharged twice, once of camera, couldnt that have been when he reached for it before he started running?

again not saying thats what happened by any means, just saying the video doesnt prove the guy "never" reached for the gun and it discharged until we know the number of times it did.
 
Officer-Involved Shooting Surveillance Video

that confuses me?
you say that "if" the cops gun only discharged once then yes the cop is lying, which I totally agree

but then you say regardless of what occurred before the video the cop definitely lied?

uhm but IF the gun discharged twice, once of camera, couldnt that have been when he reached for it before he started running?

again not saying thats what happened by any means, just saying the video doesnt prove the guy "never" reached for the gun and it discharged until we know the number of times it did.

To me It would not be relevant. The cop lied about the discharge. Even IF they later wrasses over the weapon, the fact is he used his gun as a baton and it discharged. Cop didn't say "I pursued him and smacked him on the head with my weapon and in doing so accidentally discharged my weapon". If he had, we would be having a completely different conversation.
 
Back
Top Bottom