• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens[W:150]

Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

So pregnant women can't learn? What does a pregnant woman do that disrupts the learning environment?

She thinks, reads, and writes. Can't have women doing that, especially pregnant women. Because none of that would be good for her baby.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

Lets all just look at the reality of the situation....


They don't want pregnant girls at the high school because they are SLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLUTS! And we don't want everyone at school distracted by a bunch of SLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLUTS. So kicking them out will keep everyone from being distracted as well as keep others from wanting to be SLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLUTS.

There........ You can now close this thread.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

Why would a pregnant girl affect their achievement.

Every student is to be considered in their aim for achievement.


Apparently I know more than you, jack, because I wasn't using the plural, but the singular. So, in your face, grammarless!

Achievement is not based on "one student". They use things like graduation rates and averages on standardized test scores.

Charter schools are not public schools. The end. Saying something is a public schoold because of where it gets some of its funding makes every major university in the USA a "public school". So shove the semantic bull**** up someone else's ass.

Charter schools are not bound by the same rules/regulations public schools are. Which you chose not to bold on your pathetic copy and paste job.


I like how you respond to **** like days after someone writes on it, like the coward who talks big and tough after the other guy walks out of the room. Grow some balls. Oh, and learn some basic grammar. "dog's" = singular possessive, "dogs'" = plural possessive.


Most second graders I've seen have easily grasped that, but given a psychotic liberal brain, maybe someone might figure it out by, say, sophomore in high school? I know by the time they are in college they will claim they know everything there is to know about the English language, when they don't know the most basic grammatical concepts. As a side note, when you do something really stupid, you shouldn't keep drawing attention to it. Just a bit of life advice.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

You said that this is about "creating a conducive learning enviornment". So again I ask, what does a pregnant woman do that disrupts the learning environment.
I am reasonably sure I have already answered this.

As for rules, when there is a rule that punishes a female for being pregnant, but doesn't punish the male involved that is wrong. PERIOD.
You are so strong! May I feel your muscles tough guy?

You want those rules that high five the male and punish the female, that's on you and proves you support sexism. I wouldn't have a problem with it if they also kicked out the male involved.
You need to go soak your head.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

Achievement is not based on "one student". They use things like graduation rates and averages on standardized test scores.

Charter schools are not public schools. The end. Saying something is a public schoold because of where it gets some of its funding makes every major university in the USA a "public school". So shove the semantic bull**** up someone else's ass.

Charter schools are not bound by the same rules/regulations public schools are. Which you chose not to bold on your pathetic copy and paste job.

ARCHIVED--Applying Federal Civil Rights Laws to Public Charter Schools

Charter schools are considered public schools. They do have certain exemptions, but they must follow federal civil rights laws including title IX.

Making students at a charter school take a pregnancy test and kicking them out if they test positive is against the law. Kandahar and I have provided numerous sources including relevant court cases on the subject throughout the thread. If anyone wants to dispute that, they are going to need more evidence than mere personal feelings on the subject.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

ARCHIVED--Applying Federal Civil Rights Laws to Public Charter Schools

Charter schools are considered public schools. They do have certain exemptions, but they must follow federal civil rights laws including title IX.

Making students at a charter school take a pregnancy test and kicking them out if they test positive is against the law. Kandahar and I have provided numerous sources including relevant court cases on the subject throughout the thread. If anyone wants to dispute that, they are going to need more evidence than mere personal feelings on the subject.

public/not public = semantic bull****. Waste someone else's time with it.

Whether or not they can or can't do it, entirely depends on what the parameters of their charter is and what the parents/students signed to attend the school. You see, unlike public schools, charter schools often have conditions that need to be signed in agreement to in order to attend.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

public/not public = semantic bull****. Waste someone else's time with it.

Whether or not they can or can't do it, entirely depends on what the parameters of their charter is and what the parents/students signed to attend the school. You see, unlike public schools, charter schools often have conditions that need to be signed in agreement to in order to attend.

It seems you didn't read the link, in the spirit of generosity I will post the relevant paragraph and even bold the key terms.

The U.S. Department of Education (ED), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) enforces a number of civil rights laws that apply to public schools, including charter schools. These laws include: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs

In short, it is no more legal to kick out pregnant students from a charter school than it would be kick out black students. That is not an analogy, that is the law as written in anti-discrimination legislation and interpreted by the courts.
 
Last edited:
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

It seems you didn't read the link, I in the spirit of generosity I will post the relevant paragraph and even bold the key terms.



In short, it is no more legal to kick out pregnant students from a charter school than it would be kick out black students. That is not an analogy, that is the law as written in anti-discrimination legislation and interpreted by the courts.

What is with you people and your inability to understand simple freaking English?

It depends on their charter and what the students/parents signed. It depends on their charter and what the students/parents signed.
It depends on their charter and what the students/parents signed.

There is no debate or discussions in the absence of those materials.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

What is with you people and your inability to understand simple freaking English?

It depends on their charter and what the students/parents signed. It depends on their charter and what the students/parents signed.
It depends on their charter and what the students/parents signed.

There is no debate or discussions in the absence of those materials.

If you were aware of how the U.S. legal system works, you would know that agreements which violate federal law are invalid. For example, I couldn't enforce a contract in which you agreed to be my slave, even if you signed it willingly.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

If you were aware of how the U.S. legal system works, you would know that agreements which violate federal law are invalid. For example, I couldn't enforce a contract in which you agreed to be my slave, even if you signed it willingly.

You ever heard of an ethics clause, mister wanna-be lawyer who knows jack **** about law?
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

You ever heard of an ethics clause, mister wanna-be lawyer who knows jack **** about law?

There is no "ethics clause" in a charter school policy which allows you to violate federal discrimination laws.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

Achievement is not based on "one student". They use things like graduation rates and averages on standardized test scores.
The whole idea is to improve each student's achievement. The idea for Charter Schools is to address the educational needs of each student with comprehensive strategies for improving the entire school so every student achieves high levels of academic proficiency.

Charter schools are not public schools. The end. Saying something is a public schoold because of where it gets some of its funding makes every major university in the USA a "public school". So shove the semantic bull**** up someone else's ass.
Haha, because you say so? What a a bunch of bull. They are partly funded by the public, students don't pay tuition, and anybody can attend. Only a brain dead person would call that anything other than a public school. Major universities for your information, are not "tuition free", so only a dullard would make that comparison.

I know you didn't provide any proof for your statement because you don't have any. :lol:

Charter schools are not bound by the same rules/regulations public schools are. Which you chose not to bold on your pathetic copy and paste job.
I didn't say they were, so quit making **** up. However, they are not exempt when it comes to discrimination defined by the Constitution. I thought most Republican/conservatives were so strict on following the Constitution. Oh, I forgot, only when it agrees with their agenda.


I like how you respond to **** like days after someone writes on it, like the coward who talks big and tough after the other guy walks out of the room. Grow some balls. Oh, and learn some basic grammar. "dog's" = singular possessive, "dogs'" = plural possessive.
First of all, I can't grow balls, cause I'm a woman. I guess if you were smart enough to check out the female symbol in my avatar you would have figured that out, but after the way you've failed in your argument, I can see where you wouldn't know how to do that.
Also, your inane statement "after the other guy walks out of the room" makes about as much sense as your argument that charter schools are not public.
Also, I know the difference between singular and plural, but apparently you weren't able to comprehend my statement, which was a possessive singular. So, you are trying to blame your ineptness on me by claiming that I don't know the difference, or maybe you are just trying to disguise the dyslexia.


Most second graders I've seen have easily grasped that, but given a psychotic liberal brain, maybe someone might figure it out by, say, sophomore in high school? I know by the time they are in college they will claim they know everything there is to know about the English language, when they don't know the most basic grammatical concepts. As a side note, when you do something really stupid, you shouldn't keep drawing attention to it. Just a bit of life advice.
So, apparently you aren't ready to be promoted to the 3rd grade? Also, you should learn to take your own advice. The only one that has done something really stupid was you, when you claimed that Charter Schools were not public. I provided you with plenty of links to demolish your claim, and yet you still hold on to it without providing any credible proof. Now, that is stupid, but what else can you expect from brainwashed Rushbots?
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

public/not public = semantic bull****. Waste someone else's time with it.
Nice dodge. I guess you've been handed your rear on a platter.

Whether or not they can or can't do it, entirely depends on what the parameters of their charter is and what the parents/students signed to attend the school. You see, unlike public schools, charter schools often have conditions that need to be signed in agreement to in order to attend.

That doesn't mean they are not public. But, continue with your assertion without proof, it really makes you look intelligent.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

There is no "ethics clause" in a charter school policy which allows you to violate federal discrimination laws.

He wasn't even able to prove that Charter Schools are not public schools, but insists that because he says they are not, they are not!
A_laughing_matter.gif
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

I am reasonably sure I have already answered this.

No, you haven't.

You are so strong! May I feel your muscles tough guy?

So, you have no rebutal for what I said, got it.

You need to go soak your head.

So, you have no rebutal for what I said, got it.

As I thought, you lied and this isn't about creating a "conducive learning environment", it's about punishing ONLY pregnant females.

You and othes that support this don't have a leg to stand on. You have proven you are a sesxist and wish to treat women as second class citizens. You might have had some support if you were to punish the male involved as well, but since you only want to punish the pregnant females it will get tossed out in court.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

What is with you people and your inability to understand simple freaking English?

It depends on their charter and what the students/parents signed. It depends on their charter and what the students/parents signed.
It depends on their charter and what the students/parents signed.

There is no debate or discussions in the absence of those materials.

He cited the exact part of the law that contradicts you. And just because you can get angry and repeat the same thing multiple times doesn't change that fact. Face it, you're wrong.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

He cited the exact part of the law that contradicts you. And just because you can get angry and repeat the same thing multiple times doesn't change that fact. Face it, you're wrong.

is this some kind of libtard wizard of oz logic? If i just keep saying something that isn't true it will become so? Must be a pathetic existence.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

is this some kind of libtard wizard of oz logic? If i just keep saying something that isn't true it will become so? Must be a pathetic existence.

Well let's see...on our side, we have relevant court cases and the exact text of the law, which is pretty clear and doesn't even leave any room for interpretation. On your side, you have...nothing but bluster and your angry opinion. I can't imagine why I'd think my position is stronger. :lol:
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

Well let's see...on our side, we have

Don't forget the Easter Bunny. Santa, and Obama's fairly earned Nobel.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

No, you haven't.
Yes I did.

So, you have no rebutal for what I said, got it.
What did you say that you believe requires rebuttal?

So, you have no rebutal for what I said, got it.
Ditto above.

As I thought, you lied and this isn't about creating a "conducive learning environment", it's about punishing ONLY pregnant females.
It sure seems to me that this policy is about creating, or if you prefer, maintaining an environment conducive to learning.

You and othes that support this don't have a leg to stand on. You have proven you are a sesxist and wish to treat women as second class citizens. You might have had some support if you were to punish the male involved as well, but since you only want to punish the pregnant females it will get tossed out in court.
You need to go soak your head.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

How is it a benefit when it only punishes the females? This is the equivalent of giving the male involved in the preganancy a "high-five" because he isn't punished in the least by the school. I guess females are just secondary people to you huh?

I think the acceptable action in this case to make it equal would be to kick out the male involved as well.
Kick out the bio-father, not in the name of equality, but in the name of common decency.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

Yes I did.

Please show us where then.

What did you say that you believe requires rebuttal?

Read my comment and you will see.

It sure seems to me that this policy is about creating, or if you prefer, maintaining an environment conducive to learning.

Then perhaps you will actually answer this question instead of dodging it. How is having a pregnant female in class NOT a conducive learning environment. What prevents the learning from happening with a pregnant female in class?

You need to go soak your head.

More dodging and running from you I see.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

Kick out the bio-father, not in the name of equality, but in the name of common decency.

If things were done in the name of common deceny, most of the conservatives in this country would be kicked out.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

If things were done in the name of common deceny, most of the conservatives in this country would be kicked out.
Unlikely, since we exorsize the 2nd Amendment while liberals try to delete it.
 
Re: School policy forces students to take pregnancy tests, bans pregnant teens

Unlikely, since we exorsize the 2nd Amendment while liberals try to delete it.

Yep, that's me, a liberal that is just trying to destroy the 2nd amednment even though I have plenty of guns and rifles in the house.
 
Back
Top Bottom