- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 3,195
- Reaction score
- 1,192
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Last month's "trend" is not a measure of "2 years" of activity.
Last month's "trend" is not a measure of "2 years" of activity.
Oh no, billy has the bug too, he ignores what I originally responded to.
Last month's "trend" is not a measure of "2 years" of activity.
Below defines the reason I have a problem using poll to define the issue.
poll1 /poʊl/ Show Spelled[pohl] Show IPA
noun
1. a sampling or collection of opinions on a subject, taken from either a selected or a random group of persons, as for the purpose of analysis.
This is the trend that reflects the actual Job performance, not your biased cheerleading
RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval
Which is showing positive increases in GDP, we have had 22 quarters of positive GDP growth since 2009. I still am trying to understand how positive GDP growth....is a bad thing.
Which is showing positive increases in GDP, we have had 22 quarters of positive GDP growth since 2009. I still am trying to understand how positive GDP growth....is a bad thing.
PS..note: A consistent negative component....is lowered govt spending.....which is what you guys want. So if you want lower GDP, keep pushing for less govt spending....especially in a recession.
Which is showing positive increases in GDP, we have had 22 quarters of positive GDP growth since 2009. I still am trying to understand how positive GDP growth....is a bad thing.
Do you know what the term under employed means? Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Are under employed adults?
Simply put, I think people confuse the words "good" and "improving"
Its enemic. Its below what we need to just to keep up with population growth. Household incomes have fallen while you cite "growth".
Further, someone noted that a greater percentage of Americans have jobs. Since when ? Since Obama took office ? Nope. There are approximately 3 less Americans per 100 working now than when he was sworn in.
Food stamps up 42% as well.
So what evidence do you have that Gallup is more accurate then the official government numbers?
Well that is a stupid comment....since I was directly responding to one of your posts.Hiya Gimmie
Maybe folks are trying to stick to the thread topic and that's why they're ignoring you "dancing" around the facts.
Tango anyone. :lamo
Well that is a stupid comment....since I was directly responding to one of your posts.
And I gave you the percentage of underemployed adults and showed you that number getting slowly better since 2010
Simply put, I think people confuse the words "good" and "improving"
government to my knowledge does not publish the % of adult working full time.
You really shouldn't comment about things you don't understand, GDP is not a measure of income, so why would it come up in a discussion of GDP?Its enemic. Its below what we need to just to keep up with population growth. Household incomes have fallen while you cite "growth"
I stated it. And I also put right in my postings that it has been improving since 2010.
Too late.....Thanks, but I'm gonna sit this one out.
Can you refute the numbers they published? Or more directly, is there or is there not a higher percentage of adults in this country working full time? Has the percentage of under/unemployed American adults decreased?
You really shouldn't comment about things you don't understand, GDP is not a measure of income, so why would it come up in a discussion of GDP?
Again, the two consistent negative components are lowered govt spending (which is what you guys want) and household spending. Of course household spending is down....no frigging duh.
If you really want to get into that, we have and we can....but be forewarned, it is not a winning debate for you.