Not to my liking? Where's the logic in it? What were the violations that Salam and the Occupy people had in common? List them for me please, no one else here has listed and compared the violations, no media source has listed and compared the violations. You certainly have access to information I don't have. The violations Salam committed and for which Occupy committed must be strikingly similar, but I can't find that. In fact, there is nothing to compare, from my perspective. Clue me up.
Preist he ain't. He has never referred to himself as a priest in anything I've read. He did do an online certification class to become a "pastor" of some sort and is now affiliated with the Church of God in Christ, Pentecostal. Salman has claimed there is only God's law. Sounds like the Taliban to me. Nonetheless, he is apparently legally a sky pilot of some sort.
Don't look now, but your willful ignorance is showing. If you are going to argue a position it would be helpful to you if you would acknowledge the known facts. It is clear you haven't read them and don't intend to.
To begin with, he made an application to build a recreation room NOT a church. Later he registered his church at his home address. His 2,000 sq. ft. "recreation room" is used for religious services and he has been avoiding paying taxes as a church, which he said it wasn't, then said it is, but told the city it wasn't, but told the Arizona Corporation Commission it is. There is online documentation of all this and it's already been made available on this thread. Pretending it doesn't exist doesn't change the fact that it does. Refusing to read it makes one willfully ignorant.
Handicapped accessibility comes under the Americans With Disabilities Act. Now, I don't care what Fox News tells you (and it's obvious that is where you are getting your "facts") churches are exempt from the ADA. Of course you know all that, right?
What did he believe? He believed that he was building a rec room or a church? He has stated legally that he is one or the other. He applied to the city to build a rec room, but he ****ing lied. Now he says he build a church, which he never had permission to build. He receives tax exemption from the State because he used his home address as his church, which he told the city was a recreation room. What religious beliefs is he going to jail for? He has been deceitful and has a history of it as determined by law in previous cases, one involving another church. You know that, right?
He doesn't have brass. He's dumber than a bag of hammers. You have bravery and idiocy confused.
No one is talking about the Occupiers, stop attempting to divert the argument.
