- Joined
- Jul 20, 2005
- Messages
- 20,688
- Reaction score
- 7,320
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
re: Insight: Florida man sees "cruel" face of U.S. justice [W:53]
It doesn't matter if the judge was trying to garner some votes, or if the judge was white/black/Hispanic/Chinese. If he thinks he can SUCCEED in garnering votes by locking up a black guy for a ridiculous amount of time, then that just proves that our system is racist. And the judge's ethnicity has nothing to do with whether or not he's racially biased against black defendants in his courtroom. Same thing for a jury.
But more importantly, I think you miss the whole point that our entire justice system as a whole is racially biased...this case is merely an example of that problem. Whenever people try to pick at the specifics of individual examples of perceived racial injustice (e.g. the people who defend George Zimmerman) rather than discussing the larger issue , I think it's because they subconsciously identify more with the people being CALLED racist than they do with the victims of racism. And that subconscious identification is, itself, racist.
And yet you still haven't proven that this case falls under the 60% that you claim this person belongs under. Same applies to his accomplices. How do you know that this wasn't just because the judge is trying to garner some votes? Indeed...do you even know if the judge is white or black or hispanic or chinese? Also how does Florida's court system work in regards to sentencing? Is it the judges job? Or is it a juries job?
You seem to jump to conclusions without even once trying to find any of the facts.
Just because statistics show that you have a 60% chance of being correct doesn't mean that you cannot fall within the 40% of being wrong.
It doesn't matter if the judge was trying to garner some votes, or if the judge was white/black/Hispanic/Chinese. If he thinks he can SUCCEED in garnering votes by locking up a black guy for a ridiculous amount of time, then that just proves that our system is racist. And the judge's ethnicity has nothing to do with whether or not he's racially biased against black defendants in his courtroom. Same thing for a jury.
But more importantly, I think you miss the whole point that our entire justice system as a whole is racially biased...this case is merely an example of that problem. Whenever people try to pick at the specifics of individual examples of perceived racial injustice (e.g. the people who defend George Zimmerman) rather than discussing the larger issue , I think it's because they subconsciously identify more with the people being CALLED racist than they do with the victims of racism. And that subconscious identification is, itself, racist.
Last edited: