Sig
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 2,179
- Reaction score
- 476
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Last edited by a moderator:
I wish the media would stop referring to Higgs boson as the "God Particle". It's misleading and allows people who can barely spell physics to claim that there is proof of a magical creature called "god".
I wish the media would stop referring to Higgs boson as the "God Particle". It's misleading and allows people who can barely spell physics to claim that there is proof of a magical creature called "god".
I wonder if the results will support a O(12) dimensional string theory, supporting the unification of QCD and quantum gravity? That would give us 2 sets of 4 dimensional spacetime (each set has 3 spacial dimensions and 1 time dimension so O(12) has 2 time dimensions), or 8 of the 12 dimensions, plus 4 compactified dimensions representing some interesting qualities of any particle and/or field and their interactions. (truth, moral action, causality link, thought)
I doubt it. In the fullness of time, we will finally come to accept the fact that gravity is not even a fundamental force of nature, but rather a side effect of a single force.
Yet the whole point of the Higgs mechanism is to give quantum fields mass, through their interaction with the Higgs field. So if you are talking about super-symmetries above GCD, then of course all 4 known forces are one force. So all forces are side effects of spontaneous symmetry breaking of a 12 dimensional Calabi-Yau knot.
Knot necessarily...
...that and ascribing to something as absurd as string theory just to make gravity fit into
a universal paradigm.
Personally, I've seen more atheists argue that if the "god particle" exists that there is no God or creator :shrug:
Ignorance regarding the terminology can and does go both ways.
I doubt it. In the fullness of time, we will finally come to accept the fact that gravity is not even a fundamental force of nature, but rather a side effect of a single force.
Huh..I read this same article over two years ago with the same picture...whats the purpose of retreading the same story...I dont mean you sig...the author
That's the Grand Unified Theory and is the "holy grail", if you will, of physics.
Gee, do you really thinks so, Iki?
I think a lot more than you're capable of, yes.
That may be so. Unfortunately, these added hours of contemplation have yielded so little evidence of intelligence.
Well when you get a PhD in the hard sciences, we can start to discuss whether or not you're on my level. Until then, we shall just accept the evidence of years of posting that you are not even in the same ballpark as me.
Well when you get a PhD in the hard sciences, we can start to discuss whether or not you're on my level. Until then, we shall just accept the evidence of years of posting that you are not even in the same ballpark as me.
Heh... Up until now, I thought they were referring to the Higg's bosom particle and were referring to Penny Higgs' breasts.
I wish the media would stop referring to Higgs boson as the "God Particle". It's misleading and allows people who can barely spell physics to claim that there is proof of a magical creature called "god".
That girl needs a steak.
Ikari, what is your field of specialty? Do you have any published articles I could read?
Atomic, Molecular, and Optical physics. I'm published in PRA and my thesis counts as a "publication" too