• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758, 1205]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125]

I can't read 132 pages. Has anybody posted the interview obama did where he swore up down and sideways this mandate was not a tax?

We're not telling.

You want to know, read the thread.


And yes, that weak feeble parsing of words argument was made. Tax, penalty...

You know what else we posted while you weren't reading.

 
Last edited:
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

if there are no tax increases.. how is the government going to pay for it?...
it's a couple of hundred billion a year in increased costs.... they gotta pay for it somehow.

Fear not...we'll just put it on Sheik Yerbuti's tax tab....
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Oh it will be...but not by insurance.
yeah, lube isn't covered by the government minimum plan ( knowing them, it's on the list to be banned)... but contraceptives are free, if that makes ya feel any better.
ya might get ****ed, but you won't get pregnant;)
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

AmIDoingItRite?

Kinda, but no. What it mainly is is people understanding that the law was upheld as a tax and leftists claiming it still isn't a tax.
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

if there are no tax increases.. how is the government going to pay for it?...
it's a couple of hundred billion a year in increased costs.... they gotta pay for it somehow.
In large part, from the money saved by not having to pay for those using emergency rooms for their primary healthcare.Another big chunk coming from individuals making over $200K per year and families making over $250K.
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Imagine my surprise to see there's nothing there which confirms your claim ...


l.jpg

Ok, ok. Talk to me in a few months.
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Fear not...we'll just put it on Sheik Yerbuti's tax tab....
he might not have one...lots of people don't... he might actually come out way ahead in this scenario.

I know I do have a tax tab, and I know my taxes are about to increase substantially.... but not everyone is in the same boat as I am.

good news for liberals, they got their healthcare and their " tax he evil rich people' victories in one fell swoop.
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125]

I can't read 132 pages. Has anybody posted the interview obama did where he swore up down and sideways this mandate was not a tax?

I think this will answer your question...

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: ...during the campaign. Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money, fining you if you don't. How is that not a tax?
OBAMA: Well, hold on a second, George. Here - here's what's happening. You and I are both paying $900, on average - our families - in higher premiums because of uncompensated care. Now what I've said is that if you can't afford health insurance, you certainly shouldn't be punished for that.
That's just piling on. If, on the other hand, we're giving tax credits, we've set up an exchange, you are now part of a big pool, we've driven down the costs, we've done everything we can and you actually can afford health insurance, but you've just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances. And then you get hit by a bus and you and I have to pay for the emergency room care, that's ...
STEPHANOPOULOS: That may be, but it's still a tax increase.
OBAMA: No. That's not true, George. The - for us to say that you've got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it's saying is, is that we're not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore than the fact that right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase. People say to themselves, that is a fair way to make sure that if you hit my car, that I'm not covering all the costs.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But it may be fair, it may be good public policy ...
OBAMA: No, but - but, George, you - you can't just make up that language and decide that that's called a tax increase. Any ...
STEPHANOPOULOS: Here's the ...
OBAMA: What - what - if I - if I say that right now your premiums are going to be going up by 5 or 8 or 10 percent next year and you say well, that's not a tax increase; but, on the other hand, if I say that I don't want to have to pay for you not carrying coverage even after I give you tax credits that make it affordable, then ...
STEPHANOPOULOS: I - I don't think I'm making it up. Merriam Webster's Dictionary: Tax - "a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes."
OBAMA: George, the fact that you looked up Merriam's Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you're stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise, you wouldn't have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition. I mean what ...
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, no, but ...
OBAMA: ... what you're saying is ...
STEPHANOPOULOS: I wanted to check for myself. But your critics say it is a tax increase.
OBAMA: My critics say everything is a tax increase. My critics say that I'm taking over every sector of the economy. You know that. Look, we can have a legitimate debate about whether or not we're going to have an individual mandate or not, but ...
STEPHANOPOULOS: But you reject that it's a tax increase?
OBAMA: I absolutely reject that notion.


Read more: Obama on whether individual mandate is a tax: 'It is absolutely not' | Fox News
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Kinda, but no. What it mainly is is people understanding that the law was upheld as a tax and leftists claiming it still isn't a tax.

Ah yes, of course! Is it a tax or not? Well, it's a choice, so how can a choice be a tax? Except that the choice is rather limited: you either get health insurance or get taxed. Hmm, but was the mandate designed to encourage people to get insurance or just penalize those who don't? Big Government or choice! Let the debate, I mean the hilarity, ensue!
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Ok, ok. Talk to me in a few months.
Nah, I'll just file that in the trash bin along with the other "wait for it..." responses I get. :thumbs:
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Nah, I'll just file that in the trash bin along with the other "wait for it..." responses I get. :thumbs:

Head. Sand. Do it.
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

In large part, from the money saved by not having to pay for those using emergency rooms for their primary healthcare.Another big chunk coming from individuals making over $200K per year and families making over $250K.

there's a list of tax increase already in this thread...

sorry, the federal government doesn't pay for subsidies through those "savings"
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Ah yes, of course! Is it a tax or not? Well, it's a choice, so how can a choice be a tax? Except that the choice is rather limited: you either get health insurance or get taxed. Hmm, but was the mandate designed to encourage people to get insurance or just penalize those who don't? Big Government or choice! Let the debate, I mean the hilarity, ensue!

Yeah, yeah...it's a hoot. Except for the fact that the only people it really affects is those that have to choose between eating and health insurance premiums. That ain't me, so eff em, right?!
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Ah yes, of course! Is it a tax or not? Well, it's a choice, so how can a choice be a tax? Except that the choice is rather limited: you either get health insurance or get taxed. Hmm, but was the mandate designed to encourage people to get insurance or just penalize those who don't? Big Government or choice! Let the debate, I mean the hilarity, ensue!

The only reason it survived the SCOTUS is as a tax....so guess what? It's a tax.
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Head. Sand. Do it.

If I'm the one who's head belongs in the sand, how come you're the one who failed miserably to prove your assertion that my taxes are going up by sending me on a wild goose chase to www.ins.gov?
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125]

OMG! A family of three with the subsidy making $24,352 will have to pay $3,967 per year. That's $330 a month for a family of three making less than $25,000 a year. The Democrats losses in November will be such they will walk the political wilderness for at least 3 generations!
Think about when the payments begin. The Democrats have crafted a trap. The hard parts will begin after the election. Does anyone disagree?

This is going to take one helluva hard fight. We have to defeat every politician who voted for this. We must sweep the Senate clean, we have to get rid of speaker Boehner and put in a real leader in the House. We need to strip away provisions by adding language to every single bill that leaves the House. We need to begin today. We need to fight every single day until the election. We cannot let this stand.

And then we need to get rid of a few Supreme Court Justices. Starting with the chief justice...
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

there's a list of tax increase already in this thread...

sorry, the federal government doesn't pay for subsidies through those "savings"
It showed how much I would have to pay for health insurance which is less than I'm paying now. Does that mean Obama cut taxes?
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125]

Well that F'ing does it. I guess I really am going to have to send money to Romney.

You are going to send money to the guy who created RomneyCare?
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

If I'm the one who's head belongs in the sand, how come you're the one who failed miserably to prove your assertion that my taxes are going up by sending me on a wild goose chase to www.ins.gov?

It always amazes me when people completely ignore the lead up to something horrendous.

You watch, brother. Next year is gonna hurt.

(edit: you do realize that 15,000 new IRS positions were defined in the Obamacare bill right?)
 
Last edited:
Now, this is the best argument I've heard about potential price manipulation by health insurance companies as a direct result of the extra incentive they'd have to price gouge due to the SC upholding ObamaCare as constitutional. But you know what? This just means that those who have argued for a "free market system" truly should rethink who they should hold accountable for price increases.

Until the mandate, I've actually just blamed the concept of health insurance in general, because by design it removes price discipline from purchasing health care, which naturally
allows prices to rise over time. But even more than that, I blame the laws requiring doctors to care for anyone who presents with a complaint. It's a service with a cost that we've all been guaranteeing to people as though there's no cost. In effect, it has been our refusal to refuse care that is really to blame.

By your logic, it is the insurance industry not Congress or the Supreme Court that should be held in contempt should insurance premiums increase exponentially in the wake of the SC ruling.

Call it collusion. Didn't health industry lobbyists get special invites to the White House to develop the legislation that would soon be regulating them? They all worked together to make this possible, and the average joe gets screwed. Again.
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

Nah, I'll just file that in the trash bin along with the other "wait for it..." responses I get. :thumbs:

Jan. 1st, 2013 the tax increase on the rich takes effect.... 2 tax increases actually... both medicare surtaxes.
a 3.8% increase on investment income.. and a .9% increase on earned income.

google it if you think i'm full of it.
 
Re: SCOTUS LIVEBLOG - Obamacare Mandate Survives [W:125, 384, 635, 652, 758]

It always amazes me when people completely ignore the lead up to something horrendous.

You watch, brother. Next year is gonna hurt.

Sure ... uh-huh. :roll:
 
Suffice it to say the amendment process to the Constitution is obsolete. Congress can just pass unconstitutional policies and the SCOTUS will rubber stamp it. The Court will find a rationale for Congress to do what it wants, whether via "commerce regulation" or taxing powers or general welfare, we can now be out of compliance with federal law if we opt not to do business with corporations.
Today is Dependence Day.

The supreme court has undone the Constitution in one decision. So we have to fight this every single day. Every day we need to strip away some portion of the Obama Health Care Taxes. Every day. Every single thing that occurs between now and the election must go toward the destruction of the democrats and their evil law.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom