• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Frustrated liberals want more from Obama [W:299]

As I said, reread post #248. Nothing in the paragraph suggests he's a Marxist. It is in stead a young man trying to sake an image. He clearly states it really didn't work, and he learned from that.

Ive read the quote several times and its not what you claim,. But it doesn't really matter. You've OD'ed on Kool Aid anyway.
 
Ive read the quote several times and its not what you claim,. But it doesn't really matter. You've OD'ed on Kool Aid anyway.

Are you projecting, you silly koolaid drinker you.

:2funny:

Perhaps you should try reading for meaning next time. :coffeepap
 
So you read the article? Saw the video on Youtube? Attempted to educate yourself?

I think not.

Did,did, and did. None of this is new you know. I repeat, no one who uses the American non-Thinker can say anyone else is drinking the koolaid. That rag is koolaid on steroids. ;)
 
Have you even read Das Kapital or The Communist Manifesto? Do you really know what a Marxist is?

If you had read anything at all you should read those links i just submitted and learn something from them.
 
Did,did, and did. None of this is new you know. I repeat, no one who uses the American non-Thinker can say anyone else is drinking the koolaid. That rag is koolaid on steroids. ;)

So rather than critique the article you critique the publisher?

I guess that makes sense to you.
 
So rather than critique the article you critique the publisher?

I guess that makes sense to you.

Again, nothing new here. The American non-Thinker has been dealt with many times. It is koolaid central. And it says a lot about anyone who uses it as a source.
 
If you had read anything at all you should read those links i just submitted and learn something from them.

Read a YouTube link? That's funny.

Nice way to dodge the question, too.
 
Have you even read Das Kapital or The Communist Manifesto? Do you really know what a Marxist is?
I have.

I get the impression, not just from you but from most on the left that one cannot be strongly influenced by Radical Karl unless one is precisely and exactly everything that Radical Karl wrote. Of course that is just silly.

The one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama surrounded himself with anti-capitalist, Utopian radicals. He surrounded himself with Marxists, communists, socialists, and all the rest of the left-debris that occupy our colleges and universities.

But connecting the dots in hard unless the pattern you are looking for fits precisely. And that is why many of the OTFPBHO supporters consistently get it wrong.
 
I have.

I get the impression, not just from you but from most on the left that one cannot be strongly influenced by Radical Karl unless one is precisely and exactly everything that Radical Karl wrote. Of course that is just silly.

I'm not on the left. Again, if someone disagrees with you, they are not automatically a member of the "Left."

The one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama surrounded himself with anti-capitalist, Utopian radicals.He surrounded himself with Marxists, communists, socialists, and all the rest of the left-debris that occupy our colleges and universities.

No he didn't. Ever heard of Robert Gates? Go check his part affiliation. Try again.

Also, universities aren't leftists. If you are making that argument then those that seek higher education are "Left." And, if your opposition is more educated, does that not make you foolish?


But connecting the dots in hard unless the pattern you are looking for fits precisely. And that is why many of the OTFPBHO supporters consistently get it wrong.

"Connecting the dots?" What're you Glenn Beck now?
 
I have. I get the impression, not just from you but from most on the left that one cannot be strongly influenced by Radical Karl unless one is precisely and exactly everything that Radical Karl wrote. Of course that is just silly. [...]
What is it, specifically, that Mr. Marx wrote that you deem radical?
 
Again, nothing new here. The American non-Thinker has been dealt with many times. It is koolaid central. And it says a lot about anyone who uses it as a source.

And where is anything in that article at variance with the facts? Do you know?

You haven't actually read it, have you?
 
I have.

I get the impression, not just from you but from most on the left that one cannot be strongly influenced by Radical Karl unless one is precisely and exactly everything that Radical Karl wrote. Of course that is just silly.

The one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama surrounded himself with anti-capitalist, Utopian radicals. He surrounded himself with Marxists, communists, socialists, and all the rest of the left-debris that occupy our colleges and universities.

But connecting the dots in hard unless the pattern you are looking for fits precisely. And that is why many of the OTFPBHO supporters consistently get it wrong.

The intellectually challenged leftists don't seem to understand that all of this is incremental, or they are quietly supporting it.

When Obama complains about the Supreme Court or the Constitution limiting his powers we should have at least a modest understanding of where this guy is at. They seem to sincerely believe that for Obama to be a Marxist he would have to admit it openly in a speech from the White House or have turned the US into a Marxist economy in his first term.

Even then they'd probably still be in denial.
 
And where is anything in that article at variance with the facts? Do you know?

You haven't actually read it, have you?

Please, we're talking about American non-Thinker here. Be serious. :2funny:
 
I'm not on the left. Again, if someone disagrees with you, they are not automatically a member of the "Left."
But that is the way to bet. Congratulations for not being on the left. I did say "not just you, but from most on the left..."

No he didn't. Ever heard of Robert Gates? Go check his part affiliation. Try again.
You have one example? Who do I believe? You? Or the one term Marxist himself?

Also, universities aren't leftists.
No? Just a very large number of professors. I suspect that once one gets out of the sciences and engineering courses most are closet or professed leftists. Some are radicals.

If you are making that argument then those that seek higher education are "Left." And, if your opposition is more educated, does that not make you foolish?
This was just plain, old dumb. I cannot recall ever saying that those who seek higher educations are left(ists). But many of the people who teach at the university level are. My education is just fine. I have a masters degree is something that is not soft and squishy. Maybe that is why I am a senior engineering manager on a large program.

"Connecting the dots?" What're you Glenn Beck now?
No. Just a former intelligence officer who connected the dots for nearly 20 years. But I would gladly emulate Glenn Beck if I had the talent to do so.
 
Back
Top Bottom