• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Frustrated liberals want more from Obama [W:299]

zgoldsmith23 said:
News flash, Mister, you can be Muslim AND be President. Shocking I know! There's no restriction on religion to be President! Imagine that.
Click to expand...
Are you implying that the one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama adheres to Islam? If so is his claim of Christianity another lie?
 
Kane said:
Republicans are so willingly blind.

Manservitis can tell that Obomber is a NeoCon fascist, and otherwise admit the GOP is fascist as well, so he has to falsely say Obomber is a Marxist .
Click to expand...
This is unintelligible. It was not even a nice try.
 
megaprogman said:
The longer name you can give him, the more sane you will appear!
Click to expand...
I understand that some of you cannot handle more than very short phrases.

You could try to memorize it. Or you can break it down into shorter chunks. I recommend the latter in your case. So begin with the phrase "one term". Think clearly that our current president must be a one term president or the nation will assuredly go under. Do you have that one thoroughly in your mind?
The Marxist. The one term president spent his youth with radicals including Marxists. His father was a Communist. His mentor was a communist. The man who wrote one of his books for him is a communist. He absorbed twenty years of black liberation theology, a Marxist-centered, anti-Christian, theology. His central beliefs most certainly have been shaped by his love affair with radicals, Marxists, communists, socialists and bomb-throwers. Do you have that one word, "Marxist" thoroughly in your mind?
Flexible. The one term Marxist promised the tyrant running the former Soviet Union that he could be more flexible once he was re-elected. Flexible in what way? I believe flexible in selling out US interests.
President. Regrettably the one term Marxist flexible Barrack Hussein Obama is our president. Ugh.

I know you know his name. How could you kiss his butt and not know his name?

I hope this has been helpful.
 
Misterveritis said:
There is one president who matters, only who who can continue to damage the nation. You know who he is. The others are no longer relevant.
Click to expand...

Yes they are. The laws they passed, the economics they influenced are all still relevant.
 
Misterveritis said:
Are you implying that the one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama adheres to Islam? If so is his claim of Christianity another lie?
Click to expand...

Never claimed that and you know it. You can be any religion you want and be President. Hell, you can be non-religious and still be President.

Obama claims Christianity. He had no signs of adhering to Islam and for you to suggest otherwise is a lie.

Oh and way to dodge my question. Do you refer to George Walker Bush by his full name? Do you refer to William Jefferson Clinton by his full name?
 

I speak only for myself, but it appears the poster was saying ANYBODY can grow up to be president, regardles of religian. Just sayin'! :peace
Misterveritis said:
Are you implying that the one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama adheres to Islam? If so is his claim of Christianity another lie?
Click to expand...
 
zgoldsmith23 said:
Never claimed that and you know it. You can be any religion you want and be President. Hell, you can be non-religious and still be President.

Obama claims Christianity. He had no signs of adhering to Islam and for you to suggest otherwise is a lie.
Click to expand...
But then I have not suggested it. Have I?

Oh and way to dodge my question. Do you refer to George Walker Bush by his full name? Do you refer to William Jefferson Clinton by his full name?
Click to expand...
Do you think it is a dodge that I rarely discuss either one? I do refer to BJ Clinton periodically when someone else brings him up. Blue dress anyone?
 
Misterveritis said:
They are not relevant because they are no longer in office. But you already know that. Your contention is noted.
Click to expand...

Yes they are, if for no other reason than the ideas they spread.

When George Walker Bush walked out of office, the Patriot Act still existed. There's a very basic counterargument.
 
Misterveritis said:
But then I have not suggested it. Have I?


Do you think it is a dodge that I rarely discuss either one? I do refer to BJ Clinton periodically when someone else brings him up. Blue dress anyone?
Click to expand...

Well see there you go. There is your hypocrisy. I don't see you say BH Obama. You state his full name. You can treat every President the same.
 
zgoldsmith23 said:
Yes they are, if for no other reason than the ideas they spread.

When George Walker Bush walked out of office, the Patriot Act still existed. There's a very basic counterargument.
Click to expand...
Basic and wrong. Who reauthorized the Patriot act? Congress Reauthorizes Patriot Act for Four More Years - Politics - The Atlantic Wire

Are you misinformed or just one more useful idiot (used in the way commonly attributed to Lenin) in the tank for the one term Marxist? Useful idiot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Misterveritis said:
Basic and wrong. Who reauthorized the Patriot act? Congress Reauthorizes Patriot Act for Four More Years - Politics - The Atlantic Wire

Are you misinformed or just one more useful idiot (used in the way commonly attributed to Lenin) in the tank for the one term Marxist? Useful idiot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Click to expand...

I don't even support Obama. You seem to think because someone does stand for your misinformed, degrading "Marxist" flings then they, too, are somehow Marxists.

Oh, another news flash Mister - he's not a Marxist.
 
Imagine that. Another Obama thread that becomes about Bush.
 
Misterveritis said:
And your one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama signed the authorization. So now he owns it.
Click to expand...

Nice partisan hackery. They both own it.

My President? You've got to be kidding me.
 
zgoldsmith23 said:
I don't even support Obama.
Click to expand...
Imagine that. We have one thing in common.

You seem to think because someone does stand for your misinformed, degrading "Marxist" flings then they, too, are somehow Marxists.
Oh, another news flash Mister - he's not a Marxist.
Click to expand...
I cannot help that you are unable to connect the dots. Many people cannot. You are not alone.
 
zgoldsmith23 said:
Nice partisan hackery. They both own it.

My President? You've got to be kidding me.
Click to expand...
Where is Manhattan, KS? Isn't he your president?

And if your president approved it instead of vetoing it why doesn't he own it?
 
Misterveritis said:
Imagine that. We have one thing in common.


I cannot help that you are unable to connect the dots. Many people cannot. You are not alone.
Click to expand...

Are you sure you have an understanding of what Marxism is?
 
Misterveritis said:
Where is Manhattan, KS? Isn't he your president?

And if your president approved it instead of vetoing it why doesn't he own it?
Click to expand...

He's the U.S. President - not "mine" or "your" President.

I never said he didn't own it - he and Bush both own it. Try reading comprehension.
 
Moderator's Warning:
There have already been infractions levied. Cease the personal attacks or there will be more.
 
Grant said:
I've read that entire paragraph before and see the "context". What do you see in this context that changes anything?

Karl invented a motive for BHO that simply wasn't there while Obama quite clearly explained why he was at these meetings, as well as pointed out his other anti social behavior.
Click to expand...

As I said, reread post #248. Nothing in the paragraph suggests he's a Marxist. It is in stead a young man trying to sake an image. He clearly states it really didn't work, and he learned from that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom