Kane
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,671
- Reaction score
- 264
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Don't forget, the conservatives are all jealous that our "liberal" President has a Nobel Peace Prize.:2razz:
A mistaken case for Syrian regime change
"The blueprint for this project is essentially a report produced by the neo-conservative Brookings Institute for regime change in Iran in 2009. The report - "Which Path to Persia?" [3] - continues to be the generic strategic approach for US-led regime change in the region."
"The authors of these reports include, among others, John Hannah and Martin Indyk, both former senior neo-conservative officials from the George W Bush/Dick Cheney administration, and both advocates for regime change in Syria. "
Asia Times Online :: A mistaken case for Syrian regime change
"But the most obvious test of the president's claim that we're not really engaged in an act of war is to ask: What if the shoe were on the other foot? Let's say a coalition of foreign forces was bombing American cities and killing our citizens with the intent to overthrow our political leadership. How would we respond to an argument by one party to that assault that their use of unmanned weapons to kill Americans shouldn't be deemed an engagement of hostilities with us? Merely to pose the question is to understand the utter preposterousness of the administration's position. The administration's real goal, since it almost certainly would have received congressional approval for war in Libya had it sought it from the beginning, appears to be to extend the principle that when it comes to war and "national security" (increasingly broadly defined), the executive branch should be unconstrained to act as it sees fit. As James Fallows has written, "after three months of combat, and after several decades of drift toward unilateral Executive Branch action on matters of war and peace, Obama is doing a disservice to the nation, history, and himself by insisting that the decision should be left strictly to him."
For all of you convinced the Arab Spring is "spontaneous".
"What then is the new anatomy of the great game? In the past, color revolutions were largely blueprinted in the offices of the political consultancies of "K" Street in Washington. But in the new format, the "technicians" attempting to shape the region [2] , hail directly from the US government: according to reports by senior official sources in the region, Jeffrey Feltman, a former ambassador in Lebanon, and presently assistant secretary of state, as chief coordinator [3], together with two former US ambassadors, Ron Schlicher and David Hale, who is also the new US Middle East Peace Envoy. "
Asia Times Online :: The 'great game' in Syria
Asia Times Online :: The shadow war in Syria
Obama and Libya: From hopemonger to warmonger
Obama and Libya: From hopemonger to warmonger | Jonathan Weiler | Independent Weekly
Apparently so. Enough to rescind their shipment of attack helicopters to Syria, at least.
***
The problem is most TV mimicks Fox News using govmnt/mouthpieces and establishment voices when discussing major issues like the war on Libya, Pakistan, Afghanistan, if they cover it at all.
The most egregious fraud of the American TV/Radio is of course, the sins of omission. It didn't happen and therefore never makes into the day-to-day national psyche.
When a major publication like the Viilage Voice was bought off by a big corporation or Huffington by AOL, and the public outcry is silenced, when media mergers create a huge backlash against state propaganda, one that is seldom heard, a lot of people lose faith in the system of democracy and free speech.