- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
at least in this thread, the hacks are honest about rooting for the economy to fail.
Well they didn't vote it to fail.
at least in this thread, the hacks are honest about rooting for the economy to fail.
Perhaps they should have a close look at the two candidates, as well as their selections for VP, and ask themselves who has has the most experience making high level decisions in leadership positions, enjoyed success in the business world as well as politics, called in to settle emergencies when large problems occur, and led an honorable drug free life.
If Barrack Obama is defeated can you ever imagine him being invited to serve on any nigh level board anywhere? Perhaps he will continue writing autobiographies but I see no future for him outside politics in the practical world.
Maybe he can find work as a non tenured substitute teacher in Wisconsin.
And it's too bad that the Republican Party has nobody who fits that description.
I'd rather vote for the candidate who considers the well-being of the people of America as a whole rather than whatever will help the profit margins of a corporation's shareholders.
And in that regard the Republican Party is sorely lacking.
How American of you................... Not.
at least in this thread, the hacks are honest about rooting for the economy to fail.
ask themselves who has has the most experience making high level decisions in leadership positions,
enjoyed success in the business world as well as politics
Romney supported raising various fees by more than $300 million, including those for driver's licenses, marriage licenses, and gun licenses.[138][154] He increased a special gasoline retailer fee by two cents per gallon, generating about $60 million per year in additional revenue.[138][154] (Opponents said the reliance on fees sometimes imposed a hardship on those who could least afford them.)[154] Romney also closed tax loopholes that brought in another $181 million from businesses over the next two years and over $300 million for his term.[138][160] Romney did so in the face of conservative and corporate critics that considered them tax increases.[160]
He had a 61 percent job approval rating in public polls after his initial fiscal actions in 2003, but it began to sink after that.[188] His frequent out-of-state travel contributed to a decline in his approval rating towards the end of his term;[189][188] at 34 percent in November 2006, his rating level ranked 48th of the 50 U.S. governors.
,called in to settle emergencies when large problems occur
led an honorable drug free life.
If Barrack Obama is defeated can you ever imagine him being invited to serve on any nigh level board anywhere? Perhaps he will continue writing autobiographies but I see no future for him outside politics in the practical world.
Maybe he can find work as a non tenured substitute teacher in Wisconsin.
No one wats the economy to fail
Be honest, NP: When you read that, you smiled, didn't you?
Navy Pride said:You are right and yes I did smile big time...............
And I'm sure you caught this from the report too:
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for March was revised from +154,000 to
+143,000, and the change for April was revised from +115,000 to +77,000.
So with 69k for May less 11k for March adjustment and 38k for April adjustment leaves an adjusted net of 20k May jobs created. That's right...20k
__________________________________________________
Smiling at the failed policies of Obama is not the same as wanting the economy to fail.
Smiling at the failed policies of Obama is not the same as wanting the economy to fail.
He smiled at bad economic news because it hurts President Obama. He thinks peoples' jobs are less important.
The number of people looking for jobs also changes. Last month, the number of people looking for jobs increased more than 69,000, which is why the unemployment rate increased.No, you don't understand. The jobs created number is the net increase in jobs. We actually lose and gain many more jobs each month than 69,000 jobs every month. Like maybe we lose 500,000 jobs and gain 569,000, so that would be creating 69,000 jobs.
The number of people looking for jobs also changes. Last month, the number of people looking for jobs increased more than 69,000, which is why the unemployment rate increased.