• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Elizabeth Warren’s embattled campaign: Cherokee tie found 5 generations ago

I disagree that he thought it was jibber jabber. In fact, he just can't respond to it.

Allow me to quote a fellow poster "Why don't you reread my post; it's really not that complicated." And while doing so note that I said it was 'jibber jabber'. BTW, still waiting on those facts...:popcorn2:

You guys need a pow wow!

Maybe cook up some of that pow wow chow and smokum peace pipe?
 

There is no substance to Scott Browns Swiftboating attempt against Ms. Warren. The actual substance is that he is the Darling of Wall Street & She has been sworn an enemy by the Big Money on the Street.
That is part & parcel of this ginned up controversy. Brown = Business, Warren = people.
Keep talking about it & your feeding Browns low information voters with a reason to hate their possible benefactor! :doh :peace

I disagree that he thought it was jibber jabber. In fact, he just can't respond to it.
 


Keep talking about it & your feeding Browns low information voters with a reason to hate their possible benefactor! :doh :peace

How can Woman Who Speaks With Forked Tongue possibly be the public's benefactor?
 
How can Woman Who Speaks With Forked Tongue possibly be the public's benefactor?

CONSISTENCY, Dude. You know how the 'people' are so resistent to change.
 
How can Woman Who Speaks With Forked Tongue possibly be the public's benefactor?
Considering Warren's complete lack of economic knowledge and her idiocy towards how the American social contract works I'm not surprised that she has had to use less than ethical tactics to get ahead. What does surprise me is how many people actually support the garbage she spouts and even more surprising is that affirmative action supporters aren't pissed that an "undocumented Cherokee" quite possibly committed fraud to get ahead.
 
Considering Warren's complete lack of economic knowledge and her idiocy towards how the American social contract works I'm not surprised that she has had to use less than ethical tactics to get ahead. What does surprise me is how many people actually support the garbage she spouts and even more surprising is that affirmative action supporters aren't pissed that an "undocumented Cherokee" quite possibly committed fraud to get ahead.


Funny, I think she is brilliant.
 
In liberal la-la land, the government takes it, and then redistributes it.

Liberals dream of that every friggin day.

So you do not know the difference between a private citizen and the duly elected legal government of the American people?

It seems not.
 

It's a shame that Senator Brown won't debate her then , isn't it. He's so deep in the pocket of Wall St. he's pickin' lint out his teeth. He refuses to debate Warren unless Vicki Kennedy refrains from endorsing either candidate, as if there were a chance in hell it would be him.
You tickle my funnybone... :lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo :peace
Considering Warren's complete lack of economic knowledge and her idiocy towards how the American social contract works I'm not surprised that she has had to use less than ethical tactics to get ahead. What does surprise me is how many people actually support the garbage she spouts and even more surprising is that affirmative action supporters aren't pissed that an "undocumented Cherokee" quite possibly committed fraud to get ahead.
 
Last edited:

It's a shame that Senator Brown won't debate her then , isn't it. He's so deep in the pocket of Wall St. he's pickin' lint out his teeth. He refuses to debate Warren unless Vicki Kennedy refrains from endorsing either candidate, as if there were a chance in hell it would be him.
You tickle my funnybone...

They have long agreed to three debates. You seem confused that they were wrangling over a fourth debate. It would seem that the tickle you feel was apparently not knowing what you were commenting on. ;)

Scott Brown, Elizabeth Warren agree to fourth televised debate
Brown, Warren agree to fourth televised debate - Political Intelligence - A national political and campaign blog from The Boston Globe - Boston.com
 
Considering Warren's complete lack of economic knowledge and her idiocy towards how the American social contract works I'm not surprised that she has had to use less than ethical tactics to get ahead. What does surprise me is how many people actually support the garbage she spouts and even more surprising is that affirmative action supporters aren't pissed that an "undocumented Cherokee" quite possibly committed fraud to get ahead.
such ignorance, and considering the source of the comment, such irony
Warren was awarded a GWU scholarship at 16
a law professor at various universities, including Harvard
COMMERCIAL law prof at penn law
adviser to the National Bankruptcy Review Commission - the folks who re-wrote federal bankruptcy law
adviser to the FDIC
VP of the American Law Institute
chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel ... where her monthly reports focused on foreclosure mitigation, consumer and small business lending, commercial real estate, AIG, bank stress tests, the impact of the TARP on the financial markets, government guarantees, and the automotive industry
designer and advocate of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
twice recognized as Time magazine's 100 most influential people in the world


this is the woman you insist has a complete lack of economic knowledge
such a statement actually indicates it is made without a grasp of reality
 
So you do not know the difference between a private citizen and the duly elected legal government of the American people?

It seems not.

No, I just am aware that many liberals do not know the difference between their head and their ass.
 
such ignorance, and considering the source of the comment, such irony
Warren was awarded a GWU scholarship at 16
a law professor at various universities, including Harvard
COMMERCIAL law prof at penn law
adviser to the National Bankruptcy Review Commission - the folks who re-wrote federal bankruptcy law
adviser to the FDIC
VP of the American Law Institute
chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel ... where her monthly reports focused on foreclosure mitigation, consumer and small business lending, commercial real estate, AIG, bank stress tests, the impact of the TARP on the financial markets, government guarantees, and the automotive industry
designer and advocate of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
twice recognized as Time magazine's 100 most influential people in the world


this is the woman you insist has a complete lack of economic knowledge
such a statement actually indicates it is made without a grasp of reality
I'm not going to white out here. By your logic Einstein(failed grade school math), Gates(college dropout), Jobs(college dropout) where not up to the "elite" standards of Warren, when in reality they all actually contributed something to society unlike Warren. I really couldn't give less of a **** what government or academic positions Warren held considering during my time very few academic achievements were about analysis and thinking and mainly about learning what to say, which holds true for government and academic positions in triplicate. Let's see, the father of modern physics, two giants in the computer industry v. one woman who gamed the system and speaks in the most simple non-analytical way possible who shows a great lack of understanding of how things work. HMMMMM, tough one.:roll:
 
Last edited:
It would appear there is legal precedent in Massachusetts for someone committing ‘racial fraud’.

PHILIP MALONE & another vs. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & another. :: Volume 38 :: Court of Appeals Volumes :: Massachusetts Case Law :: US Case Law :: US Law :: Justia

Warren better carefully choose her next steps…this could get nasty for her...:lamo
When I was an insurance agent, anything not about the policy was fraud. I couldn't guarantee results, speak ill of competitors, and every document was treated like an affadavit, this was as an individual trying to do honest business with facts. I don't see how getting ahead by listing a minority status with nothing more than "well grandma said" is any different compared to other falsification for gain from a legal standpoint.
 
Bull****. She was "told", at best, that she was 1/16th to 1/32nd Cherokee. She then, as an adult, chose to change her racial status to "American Indian/Native American", which classified her as a "minority". Knowing full well that she now occupied a slot in filling the need for faculties to have "minority" members, thereby increasing her value without increasing her abilities.

And she has since lied in her explanations.

It ain't going away until she goes away.

time to bury her campaign at wounded knee
 
time to bury her campaign at wounded knee

Do you actually know what happened at Wounded Knee?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wounded_Knee_Massacre

The Wounded Knee Massacre was committed on December 29, 1890,[1] near Wounded Knee Creek (Lakota: Čhaŋkpé Ópi Wakpála) on the Lakota Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota, USA. On the day before, a detachment of the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment commanded by Major Samuel M. Whitside intercepted Spotted Elk's band of Miniconjou Lakota and 38 Hunkpapa Lakota near Porcupine Butte and escorted them 5 miles westward (8 km) to Wounded Knee Creek where they made camp. The rest of the 7th Cavalry Regiment arrived led by Colonel James Forsyth and surrounded the encampment supported by four Hotchkiss guns.[2]

On the morning of December 29, the troops went into the camp to disarm the Lakota. One version of events claims that during the process of disarming the Lakota, a deaf tribesman named Black Coyote was reluctant to give up his rifle, claiming he had paid a lot for it.[3] A scuffle over Black Coyote's rifle escalated and a shot was fired which resulted in the 7th Cavalry's opening fire indiscriminately from all sides, killing men, women, and children, as well as some of their own fellow troopers. Those few Lakota warriors who still had weapons began shooting back at the attacking troopers, who quickly suppressed the Lakota fire. The surviving Lakota fled, but U.S. cavalrymen pursued and killed many who were unarmed.
By the time it was over, at least 150 men, women, and children of the Lakota Sioux had been killed and 51 wounded (4 men, 47 women and children, some of whom died later); some estimates placed the number of dead at 300. Twenty-five troopers also died, and 39 were wounded (6 of the wounded would later die).[4] It is believed that many were the victims of friendly fire, as the shooting took place at close range in chaotic conditions. At least twenty troopers were awarded the coveted Medal of Honor[5]

I am shocked that anyone with any knowledge of history would use that phrase in this context. It reeks of the worst sort of racial insensitivity as well as is tinged with poisonous vitriol.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom