• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Elizabeth Warren’s embattled campaign: Cherokee tie found 5 generations ago

come on vance. This **** was decades old crap dug up out of nowhere to feign outrage today by a particular party. She has a thin line of heritage and somehow this is some form of a scandal? Not only that, it's such a horrible scandal that it supplants policy discussion in the race?
So Native Americans are supporting the GOP candidate by making it an issue?
 
Well if it comes out that she was wrong I totally agree. People are talking about this like it's done and matter of fact and all the evidence is on the table and she was wrong. I've not read anywhere that this is the case.



I've yet to see what was done wrong... but I agree that the cover-up usually is worse than the offense when it comes to politicians.
Precisely the kind of response though that keeps it going. Just sayin. Sometimes its best just to acknowledge that it is entirely possible she made an 'honest mistake' and press on. It also doesnt do their cause any favors by defending at all costs.
 
So Native Americans are supporting the GOP candidate by making it an issue?
I hardly think one hundred and fifty enrolled Cherokee with a facebook page speak for them all. There's the Cherokee Nation, Eastern Band Cherokee and the UKB Cherokee. You act like the entire Cherokee Indians are outraged....some dont even give a ****.
 
I hardly think one hundred and fifty enrolled Cherokee with a facebook page speak for them all. There's the Cherokee Nation, Eastern Band Cherokee and the UKB Cherokee. You act like the entire Cherokee Indians are outraged....some dont even give a ****.

I see you are STILL compelled to post on this 'non-issue'...ironic it seems...;)
 
apparently there is a dispute over what her true tribal name is

Spouting Bull

Lieyawatha


Fauxcahontas
 
apparently there is a dispute over what her true tribal name is

Spouting Bull

Lieyawatha


Fauxcahontas

Soon her tribal name will be Senator Warren.
 
in four plus it will be President-elect Elizabeth Warren

yeah right-your serious crush on that twit is hilarious. She's a harpy who apparently appeals to those who think she really wants to take from the successful and give to the losers. In reality she bamboozles the losers so she can gain power and wealth that she has done nothing to really earn. She is the ultimate parasite.
 
in four plus it will be President-elect Elizabeth Warren

What is it about Leftists that attracts them to liars, or forked tongues in Warren's case. The more a candidate lies the better they seem to like it and the quicker they'll leap to their defense. This has to be a disorder of some sort.

I recently saw a (D) after her name. This has to stand for Dimwit.
 
Soon her tribal name will be Senator Warren.

Just curious and certainly off topic but did you make a prediction on the Walker recall. If so, how'd that work out?
 
What is it about Leftists that attracts them to liars, or forked tongues in Warren's case. The more a candidate lies the better they seem to like it and the quicker they'll leap to their defense. This has to be a disorder of some sort.

I recently saw a (D) after her name. This has to stand for Dimwit.
\

I think those who feel that they are on the bottom of the food chain and blame others for it gravitate to those who want to get to the top of the food chain by catering to the losers and attacking those who got to the top on merit
 
\

I think those who feel that they are on the bottom of the food chain and blame others for it gravitate to those who want to get to the top of the food chain by catering to the losers and attacking those who got to the top on merit

I remain convinced that for smart people being a Democrat is a career choice, not one based on philosophy. If they are cunning, have the morals of a crack house whore and are willing to lie on cue, then they can have a real chance at success. With a solid 35% of the electorate sewn up all they have to do is outlie whoever their political opponent might be and they'll have a solid shot.

Their supporters would happily vote for Arnold Ziffel if he had a D behind his name.

The same holds true in Hollywood where they all understand how the game is played, where the rules are much the same, and why they identify with the Leftists. People with integrity make them nervous.
 
I remain convinced that for smart people being a Democrat is a career choice, not one based on philosophy. If they are cunning, have the morals of a crack house whore and are willing to lie on cue, then they can have a real chance at success. With a solid 35% of the electorate sewn up all they have to do is outlie whoever their political opponent might be and they'll have a solid shot.

Their supporters would happily vote for Arnold Ziffel if he had a D behind his name.

The same holds true in Hollywood where they all understand how the game is played, where the rules are much the same, and why they identify with the Leftists. People with integrity make them nervous.

In what universe do you spend most of your time?
 
In what universe do you spend most of your time?

A hyper-partisan one. A place where you spend less time presenting your own views than you do describing what you think is everyone else's view.
 
I remain convinced that for smart people being a Democrat is a career choice, not one based on philosophy. If they are cunning, have the morals of a crack house whore and are willing to lie on cue, then they can have a real chance at success. With a solid 35% of the electorate sewn up all they have to do is outlie whoever their political opponent might be and they'll have a solid shot.

Their supporters would happily vote for Arnold Ziffel if he had a D behind his name.

The same holds true in Hollywood where they all understand how the game is played, where the rules are much the same, and why they identify with the Leftists. People with integrity make them nervous.


A lovely statement of modern American 'conservative' views, not too reality-based but it is what some of them believe


When the Republicans presumed nominee lies almost every time he speaks, how can you attack others?
 
A lovely statement of modern American 'conservative' views, not too reality-based but it is what some of them believe


When the Republicans presumed nominee lies almost every time he speaks, how can you attack others?

Whoa dude ... you need some Pow Wow Chow !!
 
Whoa dude ... you need some Pow Wow Chow !!

socialism is based on the lie that I will work harder so that the sloths will get more rather than I will work harder so that Me and Mine do better
 
socialism is based on the lie that I will work harder so that the sloths will get more rather than I will work harder so that Me and Mine do better

No wonder it is becoming more and more difficult to have a conversation - when one side doesn't speak the same language or accept the same reality.

from a study published in 2006
Scholars and political observers generally agree on three key points about polarization. First, the U.S. Congress is more polarized ideologically than it was a generation ago: The ideological overlap between the parties has all but disappeared, and the rise of “safe” districts with partisan supermajorities has tended to push politicians away from the center. Second, while activists in both parties have long been polar opposites, the ideological gap between them has widened in recent decades. And third, with declining regulation of the media, mass media outlets have become more numerous, diverse and politicized. All three phenomena, moreover, are mutually reinforcing.
 
A lovely statement of modern American 'conservative' views, not too reality-based but it is what some of them believe
When the Republicans presumed nominee lies almost every time he speaks, how can you attack others?

The Republican nominee lies almost every time he speaks?
 
Back
Top Bottom