• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Defines Its Demands for New Round of Talks With Iran

Mya

Mya

Banned
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
2,556
Reaction score
2,372
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
They are demanding the immediate closing and ultimate dismantling of a recently completed nuclear facility deep under a mountain,they are also calling for a halt in the production of uranium fuel . This negotiating position will be the opening move in what President Obama has called Iran’s “last chance” to resolve its nuclear confrontation with the United Nations and the West diplomatically.


This is going to be interesting!



April 7, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/w...demands-for-new-round-of-talks-with-iran.html
 
well since they wont let me go back to afghanistan,i await obamas screwup on diplomacy so i can have some more fun in the desert.:gunsmilie
 
Obama is demanding a great deal. This appears to be an all or nothing scenario, however, the current administration sure loves to talk and talk and talk. This seems like a set up for Obama's re-election bid if he comes out the hero.
 
I don't think the Iranian Regime will agree to the demands, it'd be nice but I honestly don't see it happening :(


Also ... "European allies, especially the French and the British, say they are concerned that Mr. Obama will want to keep the negotiations going, however unproductive, through the November presidential election to avoid the possibility of a military strike if the talks fail."

It looks complicated.
 
imo, Iran will reject the demands. They also will rant about the number of nuclear reactors, research facilities and bombs the US has and state we are a threat to world peace.
 
Mya said:
I don't think the Iranian Regime will agree to the demands, it'd be nice but I honestly don't see it happening :(


Also ... "European allies, especially the French and the British, say they are concerned that Mr. Obama will want to keep the negotiations going, however unproductive, through the November presidential election to avoid the possibility of a military strike if the talks fail."

It looks complicated.
Click to expand...


More than complicated, near impossible with Russia and China in the background. I think Obama will make himself look ineffectual with these tactics should he walk out with less than he wants.
 
If Ubama is ineffective, guess we'll have to leave it to Israel.
 
This is a pretty ridiculous demand.....
 
Ubama said as a candidate he would negotiate with our enemies without preconditions...Oh snap...another lie.
 
Rapunzel52 said:
Don't like it? Put me on ignore because every time I use his name that's how it will be spelled.
Click to expand...

Cool..... Continue not to remember the teaching of 2nd grade.
 
Rapunzel52 said:
Especially an ego driven narcissistic sociopath.
Click to expand...



I don't know about that... but i do know has done nothing but appease the Iranian Regime .... so I don't know what else is left in this last round of talks.
.
 
lizzie said:
Yeah, but we have a president who is up for re-election. Never discount the aspirations or the ego of a politician.
Click to expand...

Exactly. American Presidents are always making demands that they know won't be met. Anyone remember asking the Taliban to hand over bin Laden, or asking Saddam, Uday, and Qusay to surrender before the war started?
 
StillBallin75 said:
Exactly. American Presidents are always making demands that they know won't be met. Anyone remember asking the Taliban to hand over bin Laden, or asking Saddam, Uday, and Qusay to surrender before the war started?
Click to expand...


Yes, only they did not have nuclear weapons .... this is different, a different war this one will be.
 
Mya said:
They are demanding the immediate closing and ultimate dismantling of a recently completed nuclear facility deep under a mountain,they are also calling for a halt in the production of uranium fuel . This negotiating position will be the opening move in what President Obama has called Iran’s “last chance” to resolve its nuclear confrontation with the United Nations and the West diplomatically.


This is going to be interesting!



April 7, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/w...demands-for-new-round-of-talks-with-iran.html
Click to expand...

Why on earth should it be the U.S's job to make these demands? The only demands they should meet are those already made by the IAEA
 
Red_Dave said:
Why on earth should it be the U.S's job to make these demands? The only demands they should meet are those already made by the IAEA
Click to expand...



why on earth?

this is why

the Western world does not want The Iranian Regime to do this ok???????

nuclear-explosion.jpg
 
Mya said:
why on earth?

this is why

the Western world does not want The Iranian Regime to do this ok???????

nuclear-explosion.jpg
Click to expand...

Thats why we have the non-proliferation treaty and the IAEA
 
^^^

ahhhhhhhhhh is that why :roll::roll::roll::roll:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom