• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ariz. sheriff faces crossroads in civil rights case

CriticalThought said:
Relying alone on a person's appearance is not reasonable grounds to develop a suspicion that someone is here unlawfully. I don't know what that has to do with morality. It is common sense.
Click to expand...
I have no idea in which world or universe common sense would dictate that one's appearance should be an indicator of their behavior. If you honestly believed that, you might well be dead.
 
Last edited:
Matt Foley said:
I'm sure to an unreasonable person it seems that way, but for normal folk who make up a vast majority it's reasonable.
Click to expand...

Rather than respond to my question you decided to ridicule me. Clearly you have no monopoly on being reasonable.
 
It is interesting how quickly "racial profiling" is used. Same for the "racist' card. Do some people really think that a large number of illegal aliens in Arizona are not Mexican or from some other Latin American country? How would they describe the illegal aliens?

Some politicians and activists say they are protecting the "community" by having MCSO investigated. Yet when asked about illegal aliens, they won't answer. What they give is, Its the "hispanic" community.
 
CriticalThought said:
Rather than respond to my question you decided to ridicule me. Clearly you have no monopoly on being reasonable.
Click to expand...

Actually I perfectly answered your question. What I said means there are 2 groups of folks with diametrically opposed values: you are in the unreasonable group, I'm in the reasonable group.

Don't you guys get bored of the same old political mantras? Geez. I've been hearing the same script for 20 years now. Invent something NEWWWWWW!
 
Last edited:
Matt Foley said:
Actually I perfectly answered your question. What I said means there are 2 groups of folks with diametrically opposed values: you are in the unreasonable group, I'm in the reasonable group.

Don't you guys get bored of the same old political mantras? Geez. I've been hearing the same script for 20 years now. Invent something NEWWWWWW!
Click to expand...

You really can only view the world in terms of two categories of people? Unfortunate for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom