• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sourcing Trayvon Martin “Photos” From Stormfront

....IF his head was being pounded into the concrete, probably it was - though all factors to be considered.....

and yet he gets out of the police car and walks around just fine.

something tells me Zimmy is exaggerating the supposed beating he got from this young man.
 
and yet he gets out of the police car and walks around just fine.

something tells me Zimmy is exaggerating the supposed beating he got from this young man.

Fortunately, prosecutors rarely use "something tells me" in the courtroom.
 
Staring at and following a stranger around even after they try to flee from you is threatening them. that's exactly what Zimmerman did.

Imagine yourself in Martin's shoes. Walking around minding your own business and then some creepy weirdo keeps staring at you and following you around. It ceeps you out so much that you actually try to run away from him, but the bastard keeps coming after you and then tries to "confront" you.

Some here seem to think that there is nothing wrong with harassing someone walking on a public steet. It makes me wonder whether they are immigrants from Eastern Europe where such behavior was common place for 75 years. I don't think they understand what being an American is about. They seem to want to bring the Gulag here now instead of protecting something so dear as freedom of movement.
 
and yet he gets out of the police car and walks around just fine.

something tells me Zimmy is exaggerating the supposed beating he got from this young man.

So he has to fake a limp for you to believe it? :lol:
 
That isn't true. If I slap you across the face, you do not have the legal right to hit me over the head with a baseball bat. Get real.

Just say, "You're right," or clarify your statement or something. That's just silly.

Yes I should clarify.


Stand-your-ground law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(1)  He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.
 
Seeing how the word after ****ing practically inaudible I know you lying your ass off when you say you heard coon.

So were you lying your ass off when you said it sounded more like pooped or poofed?



Thinking someone is following you does not warrant you assaulting that person.

Reasonably thinking they are an imminent threat to your person does give you the right to defend yourself, even pre-emptively.

Normal people ask why are you following me, what the **** are you following me for, got a problem with me, and etc.

Florida's stand your ground law does not require a person to receive confirmation from the perceived threat that they are a threat in order to take action.


Again if being followed or thinking you are being followed gave you a license to assault people a lot of security guards, store clerks, cops and so on would be getting their ass whipped.

Nobody is going to reasonably perceive those people as an imminent threat to their person because they are in a uniform of some sort which indicates the reason they are following a person.
 
Why don't you do this forum a favor and change your lean status. It's pure dishonesty to put Conservative in your status when you're obviously a typical race baiting Liberal blinded by your misguided far left ideology.

Done. Happy now?
 
So Al Sharpton & the New Black Panthers AND Stormfront are jumping into the storm?

What next with all this madness... Ugh.
 
Some here seem to think that there is nothing wrong with harassing someone walking on a public steet. It makes me wonder whether they are immigrants from Eastern Europe where such behavior was common place for 75 years. I don't think they understand what being an American is about. They seem to want to bring the Gulag here now instead of protecting something so dear as freedom of movement.

As much as I dislike that, I'm even more disturbed by the fact that some people seem to think my belief that Zimmerman is a racist douchebag dictates my position on the liberal/conservative ideological divide.

It's downright frightening that people can be stupid enough to actually believe that an opinion about an individual who has killed another human being reflects a political ideology. If that is common, our nation is thoroughly ****ed.
 
Still bored... can you get more interesting pls?

Why do you feel it is my responsibility to alleviate your boredom?

This is that damned entitlement mentality that has infested America these days. People don't take personal responsibility for **** anymore, not even people who claim to be conservative.
 
Why do you feel it is my responsibility to alleviate your boredom?
You're right - its a bad expectation on
My part. You don't have the tools or ability.
 
Why do you feel it is my responsibility to alleviate your boredom?

This is that damned entitlement mentality that has infested America these days. People don't take personal responsibility for **** anymore, not even people who claim to be conservative.

People don't take personal responsibility for **** anymore, not even people who claim to be conservative.


Martin and all others like them, are solely responsible for their actions. Not the cop's, not Zim's or anyone else's. Shoving the responsibility on someone else just enables them to justify their actions by blaming someone else for their actions. I call bull****.


Because Zim was staring? WTF is that all about


Because Zim was following him? Bull****


Because Zim did not obey the 911 call? Horse****


Zim. the racist douche? **** me and call me Nancy


If there is one single thing I can point to that I believe is responsible for the decline in this country it is this. Coming up with excuses to blame someone or something else for the things you did shirks personal responsibility.


Your mindset is a defacto retreat from any personal responsibility for behavior. In your worldview, Martin cannot be responsible for his behavior ...


IF a tool is available, it will be used. Remove the tool and you stop the behavior.


If you get rid of cars, you'll end drunken driving.


Get rid of food and you'll end obesity.


End Marriage and there will be no more divorce.


Get rid of people like Zim and Martin would be alive


Your bull**** is getting old and tired. If all you can do is make statements that only you consider witty, why don't you just STFU? They aren't witty, they're stupid
 
Martin and all others like them, are solely responsible for their actions. Not the cop's, not Zim's or anyone else's. Shoving the responsibility on someone else just enables them to justify their actions by blaming someone else for their actions. I call bull****.

Where did I say otherwise? Martin is absolutely responsible for walking home from the store where he purchased some candy for himself. That terrorist ****tard!


Because Zim was staring? WTF is that all about


Because Zim was following him? Bull****


Because Zim did not obey the 911 call? Horse****

Why do you have a double standard here? Why isn't Zimmerman held equally responsible for Zimmerman's actions as you hold Martin to his actions?

Oh, wait. I know why you have a double standard.

Zim. the racist douche? **** me and call me Nancy

Ok, Nancy.


If there is one single thing I can point to that I believe is responsible for the decline in this country it is this. Coming up with excuses to blame someone or something else for the things you did shirks personal responsibility.

I'm glad you agree that Zimmerman is the douche-bag who initiated this exchange. Why didn't you just say so from the start instead of coming up with excuses for him?

Oh wait, you don't realize the irony here, do you?

Your mindset is a defacto retreat from any personal responsibility for behavior. In your worldview, Martin cannot be responsible for his behavior ...

He's absolutely responsible for his behavior. I've clearly stated that I beleive his beahvior was absolutely justified. Zimmerman is responsible for his behavior as well. His is not justified. Even people who don't think Zimmerman was wrong to kill Martin admit that Zimmerman was wrong to engage in other behaviors that he engage din. Nobody, but nobody is arguing that Zimmerman was justified in following Martin. All they can come up with is excuses for Zimmerman's poor decisions.

Yet when I imply that Zimmerman is responsible for his actions (i.e. calling racist douchebag) there are some geniuses who think I'm the one who is arguing against personal responsibility and accountability.


IF a tool is available, it will be used. Remove the tool and you stop the behavior.


If you get rid of cars, you'll end drunken driving.


Get rid of food and you'll end obesity.


End Marriage and there will be no more divorce.


Get rid of people like Zim and Martin would be alive

What the **** are you babbling about here?

Your bull**** is getting old and tired. If all you can do is make statements that only you consider witty, why don't you just STFU? They aren't witty, they're stupid

:rofl I wonder if the people who went out of their way to claim that I was being too emotional or went out of their way to claim that a post of mine was flaming will speak up about your comments here.

But don't get me wrong, I have no problem with your comments. I actually find them quite amusing.

I'm just curious about the consistency of certain posters around here. My hypothesis is that their reactions have a lot more to do with how much they agree with the sentiment expressed by a person rather than disagreeing with the tactic employed. To explain, if I was employing the same tactics I have in this thread but arguing the opposite position (a pro-Zimmerman position), I doubt that my detractors in this thread would have been detractors. I hope that my hypothesis is wrong, but I doubt it. They didn't react to your previous posts of the same sort. Oh well, as your sig says, Que sera sera. :shrug:
 
Moderator's Warning:
Hi. We will tone down some of the stuff in this thread, such as telling other posters to "STFU". Thank you.
 
You're absolutely right. I've never once been interesting. Clearly I lack the tools and ability to be interesting.

Clearly... glad you agree.
 
So were you lying your ass off when you said it sounded more like pooped or poofed?

It could be anything,I believe I have said that more than once while you seem to remain adamant that he said coon. To claim you heard Zimmerman say a racial slur when the audio is practically inaudible does make you a liar.

Here they suspect Zimmerman said ****en cold






Nobody is going to reasonably perceive those people as an imminent threat to their person because they are in a uniform of some sort which indicates the reason they are following a person.
Normal people do not go assaulting someone just because they think someone is following them.Normal people who are suspicious that someone might be following them usually ask why is that person following them, what the hell is their problem or what the **** is their problem.
 
..while you seem to remain adamant that he said coon.

That is a lie. I even gave an example of what it might have been instead of coon. And you have the audacity to call anyone else a liar?

That makes you a hypocrite as well as a liar.







Normal people do not go assaulting someone just because they think someone is following them.Normal people who are suspicious that someone might be following them usually ask why is that person following them, what the hell is their problem or what the **** is their problem.


Normal people don't carry weapons around wile they follow random strangers. Why don't you apply the same standard to both parties involved?


Oh, that's right, you are a hypocrite and a liar, as demonstrated above.
 
That is a lie. I even gave an example of what it might have been instead of coon. And you have the audacity to call anyone else a liar?

That makes you a hypocrite as well as a liar.

You have said more than once you heard him say something racist when clearly that part is inaudible.Those examples you gave were you being facetious or sarcastic.


Normal people don't carry weapons around wile they follow random strangers.

Normal people do carry weapons and it mostly depends on whether or not that state respects the 2nd amendment. If someone is on neighborhood watch they might follow someone around who looks suspicious. After all the whole point of neighborhood watch is to watch out for suspicious individuals and to help keep the neighborhood safe from crime.
 
Thats what it looks like to me too.Like the parents found the most innocent looking photos they can.


How dare those parents!

Is it that they SHOULD have searched for the most "guilty looking photos" they could find? LOL!
 
Last edited:
You have said more than once you heard him say something racist when clearly that part is inaudible.Those examples you gave were you being facetious or sarcastic.

Stop lying. I can quote where I did the exact opposite of what you claim.




Normal people do carry weapons and it mostly depends on whether or not that state respects the 2nd amendment.

Are you aware of what the word "while" means? Normal people don't carry weapons WHILE they follow random strangers. It's there for a reason, and it's dishonest to break down the sentence instead fo acknowleging that the behaviors described are purposefully coupled together.

If someone is on neighborhood watch they might follow someone around who looks suspicious.

Not if they are a normal person. A normal person would call the cops and then let them do their job. A normal person listens when the 911 operator tells them not to follow that stranger.

After all the whole point of neighborhood watch is to watch out for suspicious individuals and to help keep the neighborhood safe from crime.

False. The point of a neighborhood watch is to watch out for anythign suspicious and then call the police so that the police can do their job.

Neighborhood watch =/= police.
 
Are you aware of what the word "while" means? Normal people don't carry weapons WHILE they follow random strangers.
Really?
You know what normal people, who carry a firearm, do?



A normal person would call the cops and then let them do their job. A normal person listens when the 911 operator tells them not to follow that stranger.
LOL
A normal person, who had called the police and was waiting for them to arrive, could certainly want to keep the person they called about under observation until police arrived on scene so they could then point that person out.
Actually, that would be a pretty normal thing to do.
 
Back
Top Bottom