Seeing how the part after ****ing is practically inaudible it could be anything.
Could it even be cauliflower? That would make sense in this context, right?
Because you are assuming that Zimmerman is a racist you attribute that practically inaudible word to coon.
False. I am asssuming that Zimmerman is racist because I heard the word coon. As I noted before, though, the best argument I have heard with regard to what he said as far as creating the benefit of the doubt on his racism is that he might have said "goon". That actually makes sense in the context of the phone call and, to be honest, it provides enough basis for me to alter my opinion that he is definitely a racist. Now I would say it really depends on whether he said "goon" or "coon".
Following a person is not seeking a confrontation
Cool. Accept my challenge then. Follow a stranger around while staring at them. Pay a stranger to stare at and follow your wife around and then ask her if she felt threatened by it.
It it did then a lot of store clerks, security guards and police would be getting their ass whipped.
You realize that those examples are in a totally different context than what we are talking about right? Nobody is going to mistake any of those people as a threat to themselves.
He was followed by a neighborhood watch guy that thought he was doing something suspicious and was trying to get away
Did the guy have a neighborhood watch uniform on that proclaimed his status like how qa store clerk, security guard, or police officer would have such a uniform?
You have no evidence of that.
Yeah we do. We know for a fact that shortly after Trayvon certainly noticed that he was being followed/stared at by Zimmerman he ran away (and we also know that he had no other reason to run away since he was not doing anything wrong). All it takes is a very small amount of common sense applied to what Zimmerman is saying in the 911 tapes to draw the conclusion I have reached.
Again following someone is not seeking out a confrontation.
OK, then test your theory out.
Following and starring at someone means you think that person is suspicious and you don't want them trying to take your **** just like a store clerk or security guard following and or staring someone in a store.
Oh, ****, then someone had better tell the rapists and muggers of the world that they are doing it wrong since they follow and stare at people all the ****ing time. Too bad they don't have you around to inform them that the only reason anyone
ever stares at or follows someone is if they find them suspicious.
Although if you are so certain that it is so non-threatening to be followed by and stared at by a person why not test your theory out? Follow a stranger around, stare at them. When they run away, find them again and continue to stare at them and follow them. I'm
sure they'll kindly turn towards you and say "I'm so sorry, good sir, I hope I didn't raise your suspicions somehow. I am a law abiding citizen who would never do anything wrong. You can certainly trust me, dear sir."
There's no way they'd feel threatened by you. I mean, your behavior would be like the least threatening behavior in the history of mankind. There are new born babies that pose more of a threat than a stranger following someone around staring at them, right? Surely that stranger is a perfectly normal and non-threatening individual who is simply just a tad suspicious of them because they happen to be in their presence.
It's not like this person might have a gun or anythi... oh, ****, I guess it is possible the stranger might have a gun. But even still, there is certainly no chance that you could end dead in such a scenario... Oh wait, yeah.. yeah you could. But despite that, it's definitely not threatening behavior. Nope, not in the least.