Martin and all others like them, are solely responsible for their actions. Not the cop's, not Zim's or anyone else's. Shoving the responsibility on someone else just enables them to justify their actions by blaming someone else for their actions. I call bull****.
Where did I say otherwise? Martin is absolutely responsible for walking home from the store where he purchased some candy for himself. That terrorist ****tard!
Because Zim was staring? WTF is that all about
Because Zim was following him? Bull****
Because Zim did not obey the 911 call? Horse****
Why do you have a double standard here? Why isn't Zimmerman held equally responsible for
Zimmerman's actions as you hold Martin to his actions?
Oh, wait. I know why you have a double standard.
Zim. the racist douche? **** me and call me Nancy
Ok, Nancy.
If there is one single thing I can point to that I believe is responsible for the decline in this country it is this. Coming up with excuses to blame someone or something else for the things you did shirks personal responsibility.
I'm glad you agree that Zimmerman is the douche-bag who initiated this exchange. Why didn't you just say so from the start instead of coming up with excuses for him?
Oh wait, you don't realize the irony here, do you?
Your mindset is a defacto retreat from any personal responsibility for behavior. In your worldview, Martin cannot be responsible for his behavior ...
He's absolutely responsible for his behavior. I've clearly stated that I beleive his beahvior was absolutely justified. Zimmerman is responsible for his behavior as well. His is
not justified. Even people who
don't think Zimmerman was wrong to kill Martin admit that Zimmerman was wrong to
engage in other behaviors that he engage din. Nobody, but
nobody is arguing that Zimmerman was justified in following Martin. All they can come up with is
excuses for Zimmerman's poor decisions.
Yet when I imply that Zimmerman is responsible for his actions (i.e. calling racist douchebag) there are some geniuses who think
I'm the one who is arguing against personal responsibility and accountability.
IF a tool is available, it will be used. Remove the tool and you stop the behavior.
If you get rid of cars, you'll end drunken driving.
Get rid of food and you'll end obesity.
End Marriage and there will be no more divorce.
Get rid of people like Zim and Martin would be alive
What the **** are you babbling about here?
Your bull**** is getting old and tired. If all you can do is make statements that only you consider witty, why don't you just STFU? They aren't witty, they're stupid
:rofl I wonder if the people who went out of their way to claim that
I was being too emotional or went out of their way to claim that a post of
mine was flaming will speak up about your comments here.
But don't get me wrong, I have no problem with your comments. I actually find them quite amusing.
I'm just curious about the consistency of certain posters around here. My hypothesis is that their reactions have a lot more to do with how much they agree with the sentiment expressed by a person rather than disagreeing with the tactic employed. To explain, if I was employing the same tactics I have in this thread but arguing the
opposite position (a pro-Zimmerman position), I doubt that my detractors in this thread would have
been detractors. I hope that my hypothesis is wrong, but I doubt it. They didn't react to your previous posts of the same sort. Oh well, as your sig says, Que sera sera. :shrug: