• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who's talking about Sasha, Malia? It's dad, again

Once again for the people that didnt read the rest of the thread...EVERY politician does it on the campaign trail, doing it as part of policy rollout is a little more rare. As I explained several times, read the damn thread next time.

Oh I get it, it's different when you want it to be different.
 
You noticed that.

Yes. Apparently there's some sort of golden threshold where kids are no longer political props. If you whore your kids out to milk that emotional tit like:

sarah-palin-family-john-mccain-republican-convention.jpg


It's is okay.

If you do it like this:

barack-obamas-children.jpg


It's wrong.

The difference must be the (D).
 
Oh I get it, it's different when you want it to be different.

Good grief, can't you read the thread!

The Republicans are parading their families because they want to win the presidency.
The Democrat is parading his family because he wants to win the presidency again.

You are only able to use your family getting into the WH not for re-election.
 
Wrong. If the President had his kids out on the campaign trail it would be a non issue.

Hes using them as a screen to a policy roll out. Thats the difference. Party is not the difference.
 
Good grief, can't you read the thread!

The Republicans are parading their families because they want to win the presidency.
The Democrat is parading his family because he wants to win the presidency again.

You are only able to use your family getting into the WH not for re-election.

View attachment 67124316
..........
 
Why no, ofcourse not....liberals would never offer anything but the unbiased, unmitigated truth. In fact, all we need in this country is one infallible true democrat party. One that can never be questioned even when it fails. One that hold the principle of no corporations, no religion, no wealth inequality for anyone ever....And a unicorn in the back yard for the kiddies, if we don't abort them first.


j-mac

I'd rather have a unicorn in the backyard than three pink flamingos in the front. And abortions for either unicorns or flamingos are not covered by the affordable health care act, so their fetuses are protected from the Kenyan's Muslim death panels.
 
Last edited:
I'd rather have a unicorn in the backyard than three pink flamingos in the front. And birth control for either unicorns or flamingos is not covered by the affordable health care act, so their fetuses are protected from the Kenyan's Muslim death panels.

Oh lord, priceless! That was either brilliant, or the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
 
This is ridiculous. Your such a partisan hack. OMG OBAMA talked about his kids and issues! Big woopdy doo. Nothing to see here people just another J-mac thread.

You can bet that if someone had dared to mention Obama's kids, the Libbo hacks would be pissing themselves with outrage over it.
 

Your comment was insane, but your signature is over the top. You hate Thunder so much that you slam him/her in your sig line? I am a glutton for punishment, please honor me with your bile.
 
I'd rather have a unicorn in the backyard than three pink flamingos in the front. And abortions for either unicorns or flamingos are not covered by the affordable health care act, so their fetuses are protected from the Kenyan's Muslim death panels.

He was no daisy, no daisy at all
 
Back
Top Bottom