• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to Flee

Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

I think you missed the point. I understand your reasoning and rational that led you to your specific opinion. Not everyone shares your opinion and obviously used different reasonaing and rational to reach their opinion. Your opinion is not any more correct then mine, no matter how much you want to pretend that it is.

Maybe and maybe not. All opinions are not equal. All reasoning is not equal. Now, we can both declare how ours is better, but we can never show it by showing a poll.
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

...and apparently most liberals think like I do. . . Am I missing something?
Occasionally, when one least expects it, a liberal swerves into the truth.
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

It may surprise you to learn, others, and apaprently a majority based on the poll that someone posted, disagree with you.
.

Here is another poll... This one from a Public Religion Research Institute:
A new Public Religion Research Institute poll released yesterday—which was done in partnership with Religion News Service—found that a majority (56 percent) of Americans do not believe that the right of religious liberty is being threatened in America today. Even worse for the right: A majority of Catholics (57 percent) and independents (58 percent) do not view Obama’s contraception mandate for religiously affiliated institutions as an infringement on religious liberty.

They are also losing on the key argument of the GOP, led by superstar Senator Marco Rubio: that religiously affiliated institutions should have the same protections as churches. PRRI’s chief executive, Dr. Robert P. Jones, told me, “Americans do believe that churches are special.
There is no demographic that thinks that churches should be required to [provide contraception].
But a majority of Americans and Catholics continue to think religiously affiliated institutions should be required to cover birth control with no cost.”

Poll: Majority Don
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Maybe and maybe not. All opinions are not equal. All reasoning is not equal. Now, we can both declare how ours is better, but we can never show it by showing a poll.

I realize that you think your reasoning and opinion is better. Bully for you.

In the meantime, the courts have found time and time again that people that work for religious institutions can be covered under a different set of rules then those employees that work for a secular institution. They have afforded the religious institutions the ability to set rules based on their beliefs.
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Here is another poll... This one from a Public Religion Research Institute:


Poll: Majority Don

Can you find the sample for that survey? I know they asked party affiliation, but I don't see any numbers in the methodolgy of the sample.
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Here is another poll... This one from a Public Religion Research Institute:


Poll: Majority Don


Really, you're using the Daily Beast? Do you believe that they are objective?


j-mac
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Really, you're using the Daily Beast? Do you believe that they are objective?


j-mac

Says the guy who used Conservapedia as a source :lamo :lamo
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Says the guy who used Conservapedia as a source :lamo :lamo


And it was mocked as it should have been, are you saying that Minie's source should be mocked?

j-mac
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

I realize that you think your reasoning and opinion is better. Bully for you.

In the meantime, the courts have found time and time again that people that work for religious institutions can be covered under a different set of rules then those employees that work for a secular institution. They have afforded the religious institutions the ability to set rules based on their beliefs.

Actually, if you read the last ruling, that was not exactly what they said. Someone posted it a while back, I highlighted it a few times for folks. If that reasoning is used, no the courts would not say that. You might want to look that up as I've already done my part on that. ;)
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Actually, if you read the last ruling, that was not exactly what they said. Someone posted it a while back, I highlighted it a few times for folks. If that reasoning is used, no the courts would not say that. You might want to look that up as I've already done my part on that. ;)

Is there any reason that you think that SCOTUS would stand against the 1st amendment in concerns of religious freedoms?


j-mac
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Really, you're using the Daily Beast? Do you believe that they are objective?


j-mac

Here is a USA today article:

According to the Public Religion Research Institute poll released today,...



Key breakdowns

•58% of all Catholics agree employers should be required to provide their employees with health care plans that cover contraception. That slides down to 52% for Catholic voters, 50% for white Catholics.
•61% of religiously unaffiliated Americans say employer plans should cover contraception.
•50%of white mainline Protestants want the coverage. However, for evangelical Protestants, that drops to 38%.
And perhaps of greater note among election-watchers:

Women are significantly more likely than men to agree that employers should be required to provide health care plans that cover contraception (62% vs. 47% respectively).


A second poll, also released today from Public Policy Polling, has similar findings. This poll, conducted at the request of Planned Parenthood, finds

New surveys: Catholics want birth control coverage
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Actually, if you read the last ruling, that was not exactly what they said. Someone posted it a while back, I highlighted it a few times for folks. If that reasoning is used, no the courts would not say that. You might want to look that up as I've already done my part on that. ;)

I'm not sure about the details of the very last ruling you are trying to highlight, but through the past many years, they have been saying that. Is it possible that some judge foud something different? Of course.
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Here is an article with a chart of the poll breakdown.

PRRI broke down the question for different types of employers, a methodology that gets to the heart of the various ways the opponents of birth control coverage have framed their objections. Support rises the more attenuated the relationship is with a church or house of worship: churches and other houses of worship (42%) ; religiously affiliated social service agencies (52%); privately owned small businesses (53%); religiously affiliated colleges (54%); religiously affiliated hospitals (57%); and publicly held corporations (62%).

According to PRRI's data, "Catholics overall are generally more supportive than the general public of the contraception coverage requirements." The flock isn't following the Bishops, who yesterday pledged to continue their opposition to the policy and to what they claim are other threats to the religious liberty. The Bishops, though, have non-Catholic supporters: "White evangelical Protestants are the only religious group that opposes requiring any type of employer to provide their employees with no cost contraception coverage:"

Link with chart:

Finally, a Poll Gets the Contraception Question Right | Religion Dispatches
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

House Republicans, have slowed their efforts to overturn a federal rule requiring employers, including religious institutions, to provide female employees with free health insurance coverage for contraceptives.
WASHINGTON — House Republicans, unsure how to proceed, have slowed their efforts to overturn a federal rule requiring employers, including religious institutions, to provide female employees with free health insurance coverage for contraceptives.

While most House Republicans still support legislation to broaden the exemption for religious employers, House Republican leaders are carefully reviewing their options on the issue, which Democrats used to political advantage in the Senate.

The goal of House Republicans has not changed, they said, but they worry about further alienating women in this year’s elections.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/16/u...e.html?_r=4&smid=tw-nytimespolitics&seid=auto
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

House Republicans, have slowed their efforts to overturn a federal rule requiring employers, including religious institutions, to provide female employees with free health insurance coverage for contraceptives.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/16/u...e.html?_r=4&smid=tw-nytimespolitics&seid=auto

The right wing badly overplayed their card on this issue. And Limbaugh was the center of their disaster.
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Is there any reason that you think that SCOTUS would stand against the 1st amendment in concerns of religious freedoms?


j-mac

Well, you're reading of the first amendment and where it applies may be wrong. But I read their last ruling, and they seemed to limit the priviledge to actual clergy, in actual churches, and not to off shoot buisnessess and other employees. You might read it.
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

I'm not sure about the details of the very last ruling you are trying to highlight, but through the past many years, they have been saying that. Is it possible that some judge foud something different? Of course.

Well, it seems we both bring different things we've read. I'd have to know specifically what you've read to check it out. But, the last rulling, as I said, I think says something different than you report.
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

You can cite PRRI all you want...Just like a computer 'junk in, junk out'...They are a biased source. Notice the questions of their samplings are NOT provided....Ever ask yourself why?


j-mac

There was a link in that article:
Here is a direct link to the questions, answers and the Methodology.

http://publicreligion.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/PRRI-RNS-March-2012-Topline.pdf
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Well, you're reading of the first amendment and where it applies may be wrong. But I read their last ruling, and they seemed to limit the priviledge to actual clergy, in actual churches, and not to off shoot buisnessess and other employees. You might read it.


Well, I don't think so...

1st Amendment said:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Key phrases Boo, in the collection of "negative liberties" that your dear Leader despises.


j-mac
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

There was a link in that article:
Here is a direct link to the questions, answers and the Methodology.

http://publicreligion.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/PRRI-RNS-March-2012-Topline.pdf


Thank you for providing that Minie, however I can't get around the fact that after reading the questions involved the obvious conscious, deliberate wording to paint Universities and Charity Hospitals, and social aid orgs as businesses, is clear. Now, if you could do one more thing, and show where it is that the people that they questioned in this sample was listed, I can place the pieces together for you.


j-mac
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

Thank you for providing that Minie, however I can't get around the fact that after reading the questions involved the obvious conscious, deliberate wording to paint Universities and Charity Hospitals, and social aid orgs as businesses, is clear. Now, if you could do one more thing, and show where it is that the people that they questioned in this sample was listed, I can place the pieces together for you.

j-mac

You will find that info at the bottom of the page under : Survey Methodology
 
Re: 'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to

You will find that info at the bottom of the page under : Survey Methodology


My bad, I didn't read it closely enough....They still however give quite a broad definition...They say in their statement of Methodology

a
*random
*sample
*of
*1,007
*adults
*18
*years
*of
*age
*or
*older
*in
*the
*
continental
*United
*States
*(300
*respondents
*were
*interviewed
*on
*a
*cell
*phone).
*

*
The
*final
*sample
*was
*weighted
*to
*five
*different
*parameters—age,
*sex,
*geographic
*
region,
*education
*and
*telephone
*usage1—to
*ensure
*reliable
*and
*accurate
*
representation
*of
*the
*total
*adult
*population.
*

About the only thing I can take from that is that the respondents were all over 18yrs of age. But, where is the breakdowns as to political ideology, religious affiliation, age grouping, etc. Also, their own affiliation with other organizations that are vested in so called 'social, and economic justice' meme is problematic...That their particular propaganda is getting better at hiding their true goals is more frightening to me than it is enlightening.


j-mac
 
Back
Top Bottom