Don't know. It sure isn't the front runner.
you're right. it's that far right wing crazy social extremist who wants to ban abortion
you may recall this started off with the idiotic claim that the Pro-Life movement didnt' really care about children.
You mean which party wants to kill public education by siphoning off much needed funds from schools?
no, funding would stay the same - the
quality would vastly improve. but here's another guess - which President in his most recent budget slashed scholarship programs in Washington DC that went to poor children?
Seriously? You want to claim that lowering young people's wages getting rid of the minimum wage is pro-children?
it certainly is. keeping minorities out of the workforce is why we got the minimum wage in the first place, after all, and a large percentage of minimum wage earners are our youth. the point, however, is that the
real "minimum wage" is zero. as in, unemployed, and artificial price floors (such as minimum wages) simply ensure that any good not currently viable at that price will go unsold. a large percentage of our youth unemployed is not worth minimum wage plus the costs of hiring an employee, which is why they are systemically unemployable, and can earn money only under the table and in the black (illegal) economy. but hey, congratulations on convincing generations of young black kids that their only hope for advancement is rap music or the drug industry. that's worked out
really well for them.
What a silly quiz. Let's try this one: which party made it a major platform plank to oppose expanded health insurance for children?
Republicans. you may recall their introduction of low-cost health plans that allowed our poor to build wealth called HSA's?
Which party is maniacal about repealing Obamacare, which extends health coverage to millions of children?
a 26 year old is not a child. and obamacare makes our healthcare system and our fiscal straits
worse for children.
I note, for example, that you do not bring up the fact that one current Spend Spend Spend party is busy selling our children's futures in return for current easy cash. one party passed a budget last year which
reduces the future burden of this generation on the next... the other one distinctly failed to so.
Which party had multiple candidates who want to abolish the Department of Education?
precisely. because it would
help children. if you want something to become overly expensive and inefficient, you get the Federal Government to run it. why in the world would we wish to punish our children by making the educational system they depend on to gain the skills they will need to compete in the world overly expensive and inefficient.
Which party has a candidate who wants to take a whach at child labor laws help poor youth find jobs?
fixed that for you.
Republicans think that work experience that they can later translate into jobs is better for our teenagers than teaching them dependence upon suckling at the states' teats while learning nothing in the failure factories that go by the name of "schools".
look, you can argue
policy wise that this or that program helps or doesn't help poor children. but you didnt' do that - you argued
intent. which is false on its' face - the conservative movement is chock-a-block with ideas on how to help our poor, especially our underadvantaged children.
