No, completely factual. Any post that implies, infers, or states that homosexuality is a mental disorder is reflective of the ignorance of the poster. Any post that implies, infers, or states that children do better with heterosexuals than homosexuals is reflective of the ignorance of the poster. Please educate yourself on these issues. Perhaps THEN your post might have some validity to be taken seriously.
Fact: Human sexuality is directly related to and comes from the species level instinct to procreate and continue the species. That need for the species to continue and procreation being the only method to do so is the core of sexual desire and needs in humans.
Fact: Homosexual conduct does not lead to procreation. If sexual desires, as stated above, derive from an instinct to continue the species through procreation and Homosexuality does not does not lead to the possibility of procreation, then Homosexuality is a deviation from the normal sexual instinct.
Any deviation from the normal conduct instilled by an instinct as opposed to one instilled by the enviroment at the species level, not necessarily the tribal or persnal level, is a mental disorder. Since homosexuality is a deviation of the species survival instinct to procreate and acts contrary to that instinct, then it is obviously then a mental disorder. Homosexuality denies the species as a whole any advantages or useful mutations that would normally be gained and passed on thus negatively impacting the evolution and genetic advancements of the species as a whole. Also, if practiced and adopted as normal by a large enough segment of the species, then the species would also start failing because it did not have enough children to continue and grow. Since it has a negative survival impact at the species level, then it is very much an aberration and since it is in the mind, it is a mental disorder.
As to the impact of being raised by homsexual couples, that totally depends on the homosexual couple, but any law cannot take in the vast amount of deviations and special cases when it is written and must thus be written based upon common and worse case factors.
Worse case scenerio, as was in the news a short time ago, the courts were trying to determine if an Adolescent should have the right to undergo a sex change. In that particular case, a male child raised by a Lesbian couple was the one seeking the change. Considering the common man hating attitudes displayed by a large number of lesbians, it is really not that hard for some to see why an adelescent male raised in such an eviroment might think that being male is evil and wrong and therefore hate his sex. The fact that this arose is not suprising, the fact that it does not arise on a very frequent basis is what is suprising. A developing child who is male, raised in an household of two women who continuously dsiparage males can only lead to the child believing mommy hates men who are also male and I am male, so mommy must hate me and because I don't want mommy to hate me, I shouldn't be male.
There may be studies I have not seen that actually chart self-loathing, depression, suicide amongst children raised by a homosexual couple. It would indeed be interesting how the rates amoungst children raised by a homosexual couple of the opposite sex compare to normal society. But, just like Clinton killed a program to determine the use of illegally obtained guns vs legally obtained ones (he was anti-gun, so anthing that might potentially show that crimanals illegally obtain guns at any significant level would undermine his political stance), such a government sponsored study is not likely to happen when one of the two factions in our government spends so much time, effort and money trying to prove homosexuality is normal. The potential risk to their political stance is too great and of course getting the necessary data voluntarily in any significant amount is almost impossible as the vast majority of those children are now also working towards proving the normallacy of homosexuality.