- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Call it what you will, but you still own a gun or more, right?
Snotty ignorance.
Call it what you will, but you still own a gun or more, right?
Why would I want one? If I wanted to hunt I still can, and if I was so scared that I only felt safe with a gun, I can still have one.
And more snotty ignorance. the 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting, or fear, chief. If you really want to try to look down your nose at folk, you shouldn't do it from a position of collosal ignorance. impdaddy:
Later bro, you bore me.
Snotty ignorance.
Am I wrong? Can you own guns or not?
It also has nothing to do with much of how we look at weapons today. Largely it had to do with the use of a citizen militia, and not the people just being heavily armed because they wanted to be. it was also more a tool, like a car today, back than it is now.
I'm sorry you somehow read things a snotty. I don't get it, but I can't do much about your self esteem. The point is, you still are allowed to have guns. It's a simply point and in no way looking down on anyone.
That would be like telling a black man that during slavery, at least he had a job. :doh
Your argument is asinine as is your position. Let's ban all cars except for smart cars, you would tell a family of 8 "You can own a car, I am right" arrogant ignorance.... So annoying.
Did you own a gun in the 90's? Are those guns banned today? The point is, your guns have not been taken away. There have nearly always been regulations. All the way back to US v Miller, sawed off shots were banned in some places. But, gun ownership remained, and remains constant. All that fretting, meaningless.
Hardly. YOu are, as you have always been, able to own a gun or guns. No one is abusing you.
Being hyperbolic won't convince me. Sorry.
If you owned an m14, ar-15, or ak clone before NJ's AWB, then you had to get rid of it, defacto confiscation. I.E. "taken away".
Why would I want one? If I wanted to hunt I still can, and if I was so scared that I only felt safe with a gun, I can still have one.
That guy is, by law, a dealer.
A collector doesn't engage in the business of selling firearms, he's breaking the law.
Instead of poo pooing about private sales and gun shows, they should of turned that guy into the ATF.
True, then again, folks being right, won't convince you either. :shrug:
By that logic, it would not be a violation of religious freedom for the government to ban certain religions. If it's illegal to be a Catholic, but you can still be a Methodist, then your freedom is not being violated, right?
Sure, you can own the guns that the government says you can, but guns that "look" dangerous were outlawed.
did you also know that in many cases Bloomberg's butt boys would call up someone who had an ad in a paper or gun listing site and ask the seller to meet him outside a gun show so Bloomberg could whine about the gun show?
Its easy to buy Oxy without a prescription too.
I do not know if you ever collected comics,coins or anything else but people who collect stuff tend to have huge collections.For example my mom has a huge collection of Flamingo memorabilia. Coffee cups, figurines, cups, that crappy outdoor plastic flamingos,Christmas ornaments,the two dollar flamingo coin from the Bahamas and a who bunch of other stuff.
WTF! Who in the hell does Bloomberg think he is? He, nor his police force has ANY jurisdiction in AZ what so ever, and these people he sent in to this gun show under false pretense should have been arrested.
When I first heard this reported it was reported that these were NYC police, and in fact the story states "task force", but they also say that they are private investigators....If these are NYC police, then AZ state troopers should be outraged at this.
I can't tell you how this boils my blood.
j-mac
Are you kidding me here? It broke laws....False ID for one. If they took those guns out of state then they were transporting accross state lines, after purchasing them under false pretenses....That is just off the top of my head here...Didn't break any laws....Get outta here with that....
j-mac
"The good thing is, though, if you don't like it you can just sell it later and its not in your name like when you buy a new one you have to worry where it's going to end up".
I would bet mom doesn't hear that when she is buying or selling flamingos, gee I wonder why.
Private sellers do not have to perform back ground checks.So why would they give a hoot about back ground checks, false IDs and anything else they don't have to verify?The point is the sellers didn't give a hoot about background checks, false ID's or ANYTHING. Your mad that the cats out of the bag.?
Which bag is it that the cat is out of? Was there a law that they violated?The point is the sellers didn't give a hoot about background checks, false ID's or ANYTHING. Your mad that the cats out of the bag.?
No, I don't deny this, and there has been almost since the begining of the union. What I deny is that you have anything to really fear. Gun ownership has remained constant, and all of the fretting has just been silliness.