• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NYC Mayor Conducts Gun-Sale Sting in Arizona

So let's see. AdamT is arguing that no charges filed = no crime committed. By that logic the less than 1 percent of attempt to purchase violation prosecutions means that more than 1 percent of people attempting to buy a firearm after legal prohibition have not broken the law. In fact they have broken the law by attempting to purchase, usually when a prosecution occurs it is due to other factors such as the person being either a suspect in other crimes, or a perjury, etc. and it is not worth the time or cost to go after everyone who violates this. This doesn't mean they haven't broken the law of course, just that they weren't prosecuted. However using AdamT's logic Bloomberg didn't break all of these laws for the same reason, yet he has broken multiple federal gun and jurisdictional laws and quite possibly a few privacy laws as well. He isn't being prosecuted but has indeed BROKEN THE LAW.

I guess all those people cleared by DNA evidence in the appeals process then by AdamT's logic have broken the law since they were prosecuted, I mean, they were convicted of a crime in court and they are on public record, evidence be damned it's the charges that count in modern logic.

Or AdamT, does logic only pertain to things you think are proper. This sounds like a case of structuring your argument to be favorable to ideology rather than the actual facts of the case, the law be damned. As a professed legal student this is disturbing to see, you are to uphold the law, not use a "by any means necessary" approach to it.
 
Yeah, just like you had the balls to admit that you compared Bloomberg to Hitler! :lol:

Unlike you, who doesn't have the brains to know the truth? Yeah!
 
Back
Top Bottom