• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NYC Mayor Conducts Gun-Sale Sting in Arizona

Virtually everything you wrote is either wrong or absolute conjecture. I still haven't seen a shred of evidence that the Mayor or his people broke the law.



I have a feeling, counselor, that if he was convitcted you would say the same exact thing.
 
Police should be taught this.. however, you, I, folks in the military is that you keep shooting until the threat is no more. it's a little newspeak imo to change these words down, in our courses we use words like "kill him", etc, to hammer home to folks exactly what they are doing. Someone breaks into your house to rape your 9 year old daughter or steal your TV, you don't know, you keep firing until the threat is stopped. I.E. dead or severely wounded that his will or his ability to continue is eliminated.
This is true, the basic court answer though is "stop the aggression" because a bunch of nanny staters want everyone to get along regardless of the other person's intent. I don't give two ****s about the guy breaking into my house or threatening my safety and will use all appropriate force to stop that.









We teach no one gets seconds until each one gets one...
I Love it. That's right up there with "once you've pulled the pin Mr. Grenade is not your friend."
 
Personally I'd rather not get into a gun fight, but if I do, I'd rather have more ore firepower than the criminal, Your dumb laws restrict law abiding citizens, not criminals. But gun grabbers know this. It's not the point to them.

How many criminals do you see carrying fully automatic weapons?
 
So you wouldn't have a problem getting into a gun fight, if you have a single-shot pistol and the other guy has a Glock with a 15 round magazine?
Holy bat**** was THAT ever a completely unrelated response to the argument. Dead 7 year old girl with a single shot to the chest by a 7 year old playmate who found the gun in crack dealer uncles apartment equals single shot vs 15 round magazine shootout? Geeezus...did someone say you were actually purported to be an 'attorney'?
 
It's funny because....?

Because you engage in so many logical fallacies that Aristotle is waiting around for you in the afterlife with a baseball bat.
 
This is true, the basic court answer though is "stop the aggression" because a bunch of nanny staters want everyone to get along regardless of the other person's intent. I don't give two ****s about the guy breaking into my house or threatening my safety and will use all appropriate force to stop that.


The ONLY answer starts at the scene of the crime... "Officer, I was in fear of my life, I would like to speak to my lawyer, no I would not like to answer any questions without my attorney present".... That is your only response.






I Love it. That's right up there with "once you've pulled the pin Mr. Grenade is not your friend."

We have all sorts of colorful musings. :pimpdaddy:
 
How many criminals do you see carrying fully automatic weapons?


More so than law abiding citizens. :shrug:


How many people a year were killed before the MG ban, compared to after by machine guns, go on counselor, I'll wait.
 
That's not saying much. :D



No it's not, The obvious apex of intellectualism can be found within the Greatness that is The Good Reverend, A gentleman of impeccable taste, astute wit, and a wry smile are just mere clues to his awesomeness, as ones better.. behold and prostrate yourself, for he is here. :pimpdaddy:
 
More so than law abiding citizens. :shrug:


How many people a year were killed before the MG ban, compared to after by machine guns, go on counselor, I'll wait.

Fair enough, that didn't seem to do much -- or rather, gun deaths increased after. However, gun deaths plunged after the much more comprehensive Brady Bill, and they continue to fall.
 
No it's not, The obvious apex of intellectualism can be found within the Greatness that is The Good Reverend, A gentleman of impeccable taste, astute wit, and a wry smile are just mere clues to his awesomeness, as ones better.. behold and prostrate yourself, for he is here. :pimpdaddy:

Wow, that was truly Gingrichian.
 
Fair enough, that didn't seem to do much -- or rather, gun deaths increased after. However, gun deaths plunged after the much more comprehensive Brady Bill, and they continue to fall.



Cite please.
 
Right, and Bush used the tragic deaths of 3,000 Americans to invade Iraq.

Right, and FDR used the tragic deaths of 3,000 Americans to invade Japan.

See how stupid your comment was now ???
 
Right, and FDR used the tragic deaths of 3,000 Americans to invade Japan.

See how stupid your comment was now ???

Funny how when I see similar comments of a tragedy not going to waste aimed at Obama how few conservatives make your case. Not that I disagree, as someone lazy can make that argument against anyone trying to address a problem, and maybe even hit one correctly. But, it skips the point. Using it or not doesn't settle the issue for either side.
 
Funny how when I see similar comments of a tragedy not going to waste aimed at Obama how few conservatives make your case. Not that I disagree, as someone lazy can make that argument against anyone trying to address a problem, and maybe even hit one correctly. But, it skips the point. Using it or not doesn't settle the issue for either side.


Who says the issue would be settled here anyway? It's an internet message board for Christ sake....Nothing is EVER settled.


j-mac
 
Who says the issue would be settled here anyway? It's an internet message board for Christ sake....Nothing is EVER settled.


j-mac

Where did I say it was?

:coffeepap
 
Funny how when I see similar comments of a tragedy not going to waste aimed at Obama how few conservatives make your case. Not that I disagree, as someone lazy can make that argument against anyone trying to address a problem, and maybe even hit one correctly. But, it skips the point. Using it or not doesn't settle the issue for either side.

I think you should have quoted Adam, but that would go against your principles to actually criticize a fellow liberal wouldn't it ?
 
Back
Top Bottom