• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

State of the Union Address

Conservative said:
Where is the class warfare in the Romney statement? Please enlighten us all? Did Romney claim the rich weren't paying their fair share and proposed raising their taxes?
Click to expand...
Where Romney said he's going to focus on the middle class to the detriment of the lower and upper classes.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Who do you think you're kidding, Con? Everyone here knows you'd vote for Ayman Al-Zawahiri as long as he put an 'R' after his name.
Click to expand...

Vs. Obama, you got it, anyone with a R after their name is a better alternative. I have seen you say that you would vote for Romney as well.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Where Romney said he's going to focus on the middle class to the detriment of the lower and upper classes.
Click to expand...

Now that is a lie, "at the detriment of the lower and upper classes". You really are going off the deep end in desparation to support your liberals bs ideology
 
Conservative said:
Now that is a lie, "at the detriment of the lower and upper classes". You really are going off the deep end in desparation to support your liberals bs ideology
Click to expand...

You've clearly got your Mittens covering your eyes.
 
Conservative said:
Liberals keep raising the issue and I responded. Suggest you read all the posts including the one I was responding to.
Click to expand...

:2funny:

Be serious. You know you bring it up, and so do your fellow conservatives on this board.

:2funny:
 
AdamT said:
You've clearly got your Mittens covering your eyes.
Click to expand...

You clearly have been brainwashed by the Obama rhetoric as you ignore the Obama facts. Romney didn't say he would do anything to the detriment of the lower income people. They have a safety net and if it is broken Romney will fix it. It is about time people took personal responsibility for their own actions. A growing economy will raise all boats and we have seen how bad Obama has done at doing that therefore time for real change.
 
Conservative said:
You clearly have been brainwashed by the Obama rhetoric as you ignore the Obama facts. Romney didn't say he would do anything to the detriment of the lower income people. They have a safety net and if it is broken Romney will fix it. It is about time people took personal responsibility for their own actions. A growing economy will raise all boats and we have seen how bad Obama has done at doing that therefore time for real change.
Click to expand...

LoL! Yeah change back to the Bush policy of increased military spending and even more tax cuts for the rich that lost more manufacturing jobs and created more debt than any president in the last 40 year! That's the ticket!
 
Catawba said:
LoL! Yeah change back to the Bush policy of increased military spending and even more tax cuts for the rich that lost more manufacturing jobs and created more debt than any president in the last 40 year! That's the ticket!
Click to expand...

Looks like the public is waking up. Amazing that Obama won with 52% of the vote and is now having serious problems getting over 50% in most of the states. Doesn't appear that the majority feel the same love for Obama that you do. Maybe it is because they actually are seeing the results and not buying the rhetoric that you buy

From the Washington Examiner, today:

Gallup state numbers predict huge Obama loss | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner

Gallup released their annual state-by-state presidential approval numbers yesterday, and the results should have 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue very worried. If President Obama carries only those states where he had a net positive approval rating in 2011 (e.g. Michigan where he is up 48 percent to 44 percent), Obama would lose the 2012 election to the Republican nominee 323 electoral votes to 215.
Click to expand...
 
Conservative said:
Looks like the public is waking up. Amazing that Obama won with 52% of the vote and is now having serious problems getting over 50% in most of the states. Doesn't appear that the majority feel the same love for Obama that you do. Maybe it is because they actually are seeing the results and not buying the rhetoric that you buy

From the Washington Examiner, today:

Gallup state numbers predict huge Obama loss | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner
Click to expand...

Did I miss the Democratic primaries?
 
AdamT said:
Did I miss the Democratic primaries?
Click to expand...

5 have been held so far.....of course Obama was the only one on the ballot in 2 of the states.. and he soundly whooped the nutbag candidates that are "challenging" him in the other 3.

Democrats don't have a choice this year.. it's Obama or Obama
 
Thrilla said:
5 have been held so far.....of course Obama was the only one on the ballot in 2 of the states.. and he soundly whooped the nutbag candidates that are "challenging" him in the other 3.

Democrats don't have a choice this year.. it's Obama or Obama
Click to expand...

Wow, he was the only candidate and he didn't score more than 50%? That IS bad.
 
Conservative said:
Looks like the public is waking up. Amazing that Obama won with 52% of the vote and is now having serious problems getting over 50% in most of the states. Doesn't appear that the majority feel the same love for Obama that you do. Maybe it is because they actually are seeing the results and not buying the rhetoric that you buy

From the Washington Examiner, today:

Gallup state numbers predict huge Obama loss | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner
Click to expand...


and...what are the approval numbers for willard or newt in them states?
 
Conservative said:
Looks like the public is waking up. Amazing that Obama won with 52% of the vote and is now having serious problems getting over 50% in most of the states. Doesn't appear that the majority feel the same love for Obama that you do. Maybe it is because they actually are seeing the results and not buying the rhetoric that you buy

From the Washington Examiner, today:

Gallup state numbers predict huge Obama loss | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner
Click to expand...

You say it is a problem for Obama to have a 48% approval rating, which is double digits about the GOP approval rating of 19%???
 
Thrilla said:
:lol:.. i don't think he was talking about primaries....
Click to expand...

Even less credible, he's trying to guess the outcome of the election based on JAR. Wouldn't that include people who disapprove of the job he's doing who are going to vote for him anyway?
 
pbrauer said:
Here is a head-to-head poll in Ohio which is a key state.


Ohio Poll: Obama Ahead As Romney Stumbles | TPM2012
Click to expand...

Your support for Obama is noted just like your lack of interest in Obama results. Obama takes office with 142.2 million people working. Today that number is 140 million working so we have a net job loss of over 2 million people. Are we headedin the right direction, after adding 4.6 trillion to the debt we should have stronger economic growth than we have which shows very poor leadership.
 
Conservative said:
Your support for Obama is noted just like your lack of interest in Obama results. Obama takes office with 142.2 million people working. Today that number is 140 million working so we have a net job loss of over 2 million people. Are we headedin the right direction, after adding 4.6 trillion to the debt we should have stronger economic growth than we have which shows very poor leadership.
Click to expand...

His post was about support for Obama in the key battleground state of Ohio. Your rote recitation of out-of-context statistics is not noted.
 
pbrauer said:
Here is a head-to-head poll in Ohio which is a key state.


Ohio Poll: Obama Ahead As Romney Stumbles | TPM2012
Click to expand...


I think it is interesting why he pulled ahead in Ohio:

From your article:

"After the massive defeat of SB 5, the anti-union legislation pushed by state Republicans, Obama has seen a major turnaround in his numbers on the ground.

Back in October, PPP’s President Dean Debnam said that were the election to have been held then, Obama would have lost. PPP’s analysis at the time suggested it would be hard to see more support coming to the president as the election got closer. The SB 5 vote moved the state back toward Obama in PPP’s November poll, resulting in a nine point lead, and it seems that trend is continuing into the new year."
 
Catawba said:
I think it is interesting why he pulled ahead in Ohio:

From your article:

"After the massive defeat of SB 5, the anti-union legislation pushed by state Republicans, Obama has seen a major turnaround in his numbers on the ground.

Back in October, PPP’s President Dean Debnam said that were the election to have been held then, Obama would have lost. PPP’s analysis at the time suggested it would be hard to see more support coming to the president as the election got closer. The SB 5 vote moved the state back toward Obama in PPP’s November poll, resulting in a nine point lead, and it seems that trend is continuing into the new year."
Click to expand...

your support for Obama and his policies is noted including his massive expansion of the nanny state
 
Obama's speeches are getting more and more lame, more and more about political rhetoric.
At least I thought Obama had his standards. They apparently disappeared along with his leadership
 
Proud South Korean said:
Obama's speeches are getting more and more lame, more and more about political rhetoric.
At least I thought Obama had his standards. They apparently disappeared along with his leadership
Click to expand...

Well, it is an election year. Expect more of the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom