ric27
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2010
- Messages
- 7,541
- Reaction score
- 3,195
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You're making about as much sense today as you usually do.
Are you married?
You're making about as much sense today as you usually do.
Yes, Clinton lied. And as Dole voter, I don't approve. But frankly, if you don't know Newt threw stones, you either have no knowledge of newt, or your memory is selective.
I have more knowledge of Newt than you, a far less selective memory, and frankly have forgotten more than you will ever learn. Satisfied ?
Clinton lied to a grand jury.
Is lying wrong? Is adultery wrong? Both? Or neither?
LOL .. what's next, is "murder" wrong ...... show us all "he who is without sin", and then maybe you got something
It's amazing you can't just give a straight answer to such easy questions.
That you choose to ask questions one would expect of a first grader is your business.
I have more knowledge of Newt than you, a far less selective memory, and frankly have forgotten more than you will ever learn. Satisfied ?
Clinton lied to a grand jury.
Is lying wrong? Is adultery wrong? Both? Or neither?
You've clearly forgotten a lot.
Yes, I know Clinton lied to a jury, but you don't see me defending him. You are defending newt, who has spoken for family vaules. Who maintians marriage is between one man and one woman (not several women).
Newt is married to one woman and not several women.
Married is the key word, but he's had more than one woman during those marriages, which I'm sure is a fine distinction to make. :roll:
The left is getting all pervy about sex, again.
Of course marriage is the key word and he is married to one woman.
He's "had" more than one woman during those marriages??
What "distinction" are you trying to make?
The left is getting all pervy about sex, again.
Personally, I would like to see Gingrich get the nomination just to see what Pelosi has on him.
Pelosi: Gingrich presidency "not going to happen"
"Pelosi told CNN's John King in an interview on Tuesday. "That's not going to happen. Let me just make my prediction and stand by it: it isn't going to happen."
When pressed on why she was so sure, Pelosi said: "There is something I know. The Republicans, if they choose to nominate him, that's their prerogative. I don't even think that's going to happen."
Pelosi: Gingrich presidency "not going to happen" - Political Hotsheet - CBS News
?That you cannot value marriage in any way and have affiars like he does. It's really quite simple. :coffeepap
This White House had turned graft into an art form. Give money by the billions to millionaires and political cronies - and the environmentalists cheer you for it!
That's one of the reasons the "Stimulus" failed so miserably, but we're still stuck with the bill. I can't think of a better reason to dump Obama come November.
I mentioned this earlier. I was watching when she said this. I find it annoying that she says this without being more specific.
?
I do not value marriage? What evidence do you have of that.
How many affairs has he had and how many would be approved by the Democrats these days?
Well, again, there is nothing in the article that establishes a connection between the contract change and the campaign donor. From a business perspective there is a very good reason why they might have wanted to subordinate the government interest. It makes private investment more attractive.
OTOH, we know for a fact that Gingrich accepted $1.6 million from Freddie Mac, and if you believe he was paid $1.6 million for "historian services" I've got some swamp land I'd like to sell you.
So the big issue in this election is how many wives a candidate has had?
Not debt, over regulation, unemployment, the possibility of a budget?
Rock on!
Not really. He was booted out as Speaker of the House for ethics violations. He lies like a rug. I think character has a lot to do with it. He's also been pointed out as siding with some Libs on some issues, so, since when do cons accept Lib policies? When they think that's all they've got left?