• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay marriage a threat to humanity's future: Pope

Andalublue said:
No, nothing. After all, none of these people contributed anything to civilisation...

Alexander the Great
Leonard Bernstein
Truman Capote
Carravaggio
Leonardo DaVinci
Daphne Du Maurier
Sergei Eisenstein
Brian Epstein
David Geffen
André Gide
Emperor Hadrian
Jasper Johns
Frida Kahlo
John Maynard Keynes
Charles Laughton
Lawrence of Arabia
Annie Leibovitz
Christopher Marlowe
Michelangelo
Nietsche
Martina Navratilova
Marcel Proust
Arthur Rimbaud
Yves St. Laurent
Randy Shilts
Anthony Sher
Bessie Smith
Stephen Sondheim
Alan Turing
Gianni Versace
Gore Vidal
Andy Warhol
Wittgenstein
Virginia Woolf
Franco Zeffirelli
Click to expand...

You forgot Richard Simmons, RuPaul, Rachel Maddow, and the Expedia guy.

All of which are just as important as your tennis players and fragrance designers.

And it is comically pathetic the lengths that gays are going to "prove" the sexual orientation of figures from hundreds or thousands of years ago.
 
TheNextEra said:
Tell you what, PM me with a number to reach you, and if we can set up a third party to hold the money, setup a time for a ring event, a referee, and for a bet say like $10,000 I'm sure my friend will be more than happy to come down and whoop your arse. You care to take that bet?
Click to expand...

Could end up like this:

Bruno Ending - Gay Cage Fight HD - YouTube
 
Erod said:
You forgot Richard Simmons, RuPaul, Rachel Maddow, and the Expedia guy.

All of which are just as important as your tennis players and fragrance designers.

And it is comically pathetic the lengths that gays are going to "prove" the sexual orientation of figures from hundreds or thousands of years ago.
Click to expand...

Actually it's pretty comically pathetic to see you continue this ridiculous crap.
 
Erod said:
You forgot Richard Simmons, RuPaul, Rachel Maddow, and the Expedia guy.

All of which are just as important as your tennis players and fragrance designers.

And it is comically pathetic the lengths that gays are going to "prove" the sexual orientation of figures from hundreds or thousands of years ago.
Click to expand...

Again, why do you care about other people's sex lives? Why are you so obsessed with gays?
 
Erod said:
You forgot Richard Simmons, RuPaul, Rachel Maddow, and the Expedia guy.
Click to expand...
I don't know who three of those four are.
All of which are just as important as your tennis players and fragrance designers.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but Alexander the Great beat Darius in straight sets on the 332BC ATP tour! And have you smelled Wittgenstein's Eau de Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus? Fabulous!

And it is comically pathetic the lengths that gays are going to "prove" the sexual orientation of figures from hundreds or thousands of years ago.
Click to expand...
No proving necessary. All the above made no secret about who they porked.
 
ric27 said:
I do care when there is a concerted demand that we all accept it as normal. It is not normal, it is abnormal.

The purpose of the reproductive drive is to reproduce. Homosexuality is in no way shape or form does that nor attempts to use the means for that purpose. It is a sexual perversion.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you feel the same way about oral and/or anal sex with your wife or girlfriend, and you've never had sex for any reason other than to get pregnant.

Right?
 
Binary_Digit said:
I'm sure you feel the same way about oral and/or anal sex with your wife or girlfriend, and you've never had sex for any reason other than to get pregnant.

Right?
Click to expand...

Homosexuals define themselves by their sexuality. Normal people don't.


​
 
ric27 said:
Homosexuals define themselves by their sexuality. Normal people don't.
​
Click to expand...

1. That's a load of bull****. Homosexuals define themselves like anyone else, as people. It's your pathetic, insulting attitude that defines them that way.

2. By whining about gays, you're defining your self by your sexuality right now.

3. Answer the question. What you offered was a massive dodge. You're a huge hypocrite who thinks he can get away with "perversions" as long as he does them with girls. Truly pathetic.​
 
Last edited:
TheNextEra said:
Tell you what, PM me with a number to reach you, and if we can set up a third party to hold the money, setup a time for a ring event, a referee, and for a bet say like $10,000 I'm sure my friend will be more than happy to come down and whoop your arse. You care to take that bet?
Click to expand...

You just made my case....

Ever homosexual defines himself as first and foremost homosexual. They can't wait to tell every one and then they wait for the reaction.​
 
ric27 said:
You just made my case....

Ever homosexual defines himself as first and foremost homosexual. They can't wait to tell every one and then they wait for the reaction.​
Click to expand...

Even the ones who are in the closet and never ever tell anyone?

Stop the stupid. Use your brain power for something more than rationalizing your pathetic hatred.
 
ric27 said:
You just made my case....

Ever homosexual defines himself as first and foremost homosexual. They can't wait to tell every one and then they wait for the reaction.​
Click to expand...

How have I made my case? You don't know my friend and he doesn't define himself first as a homosexual. He identifies himself first and foremost as a fighter. He just happens to be gay.

So again, care to take the bet or will you slither off as usual?
 
TheNextEra said:
How have I made my case? You don't know my friend and he doesn't define himself first as a homosexual. He identifies himself first and foremost as a fighter. He just happens to be gay.

So again, care to take the bet or will you slither off as usual?
Click to expand...

I vote slither.
 
MaggieD said:
I personally am appalled at the church's continual cover-up of those sexual abuse scandals.
Click to expand...
So am I.

More than that, by its exclusionary religious practices, the idea that one can buy (with $$) their way out of mortal sin through Special Dispensation, that if one dies in mortal sin they go to hell, and that babies who die without being baptised are kept segregated in limbo. I could go on. Thank God they can eat meat on Fridays now or hell would be full. :rofl
Click to expand...
No one could ever buy their way out of Hell, indulgences are grossly misunderstood. The concept of limbo was never dogma and years ago it was dispensed with altogether.
 
misterman said:
Again, why do you care about other people's sex lives? Why are you so obsessed with gays?
Click to expand...

I really don't, but damnit if they don't. Holy crap, it dominates their every motivation. They just can't sit still without making sure that EVERYONE knows they're gay, they're proud, and they're NORMAL. They're not normal.
 
Erod said:
I really don't, but damnit if they don't. Holy crap, it dominates their every motivation. They just can't sit still without making sure that EVERYONE knows they're gay, they're proud, and they're NORMAL. They're not normal.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you have gaydar.
 
Erod said:
I really don't, but damnit if they don't. Holy crap, it dominates their every motivation. They just can't sit still without making sure that EVERYONE knows they're gay, they're proud, and they're NORMAL. They're not normal.
Click to expand...

That's just plain stupid. Grow up.
 
spud_meister said:
How does gay marriage undermine families again? It won't stop straight people from procreating, and it'll provide homes for otherwise unwanted kids if gays choose to adopt.
Click to expand...

The argument that it hurts families makes no sense, it never has, and it never will. I don't understand how they can keep using it and not be laughed at.
 
ric27 said:
You just made my case....

Ever homosexual defines himself as first and foremost homosexual. They can't wait to tell every one and then they wait for the reaction.​
Click to expand...

Completely false.
 
Erod said:
I really don't, but damnit if they don't. Holy crap, it dominates their every motivation. They just can't sit still without making sure that EVERYONE knows they're gay, they're proud, and they're NORMAL. They're not normal.
Click to expand...

OMG da gayzz they want equal rights and i hate them because they won't shut up about how they want equal rights!! OMGZORZ MAKE THEM STOP
 
Those gays are just so gay. All they talk about is gayness. Gay gay gay. I'm gay, he's gay, she's gay. Why don't they shut up about gayness? You wouldn't see me talking about gay this and gay that all the time. They're obsessed!
 
spud_meister said:
How does gay marriage undermine families again? It won't stop straight people from procreating, and it'll provide homes for otherwise unwanted kids if gays choose to adopt.
Click to expand...

Simple, it doesnt, it doesnt one bit LMAO
 
ThePlayDrive said:
Did someone say that this is what he said?
Click to expand...


I was wondering that myself but then I saw the name of the poster who implied that and I thought nothing of it after that. I no longer expected accuracy or honesty. :shrug:
 
Wessexman said:
It seems implied in the title of the thread.
Click to expand...
The title just says that the Pope thinks SSM is a threat to humanity's future. It says nothing about SSM ending humanity on its own.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom