• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2 women share 1st kiss at US Navy ship's return

It has plenty to do with it. Several posters have written that the repeal of DADT has not harmed the military. This case appears to shows that it has

Rather myopic to assume that one case has that much importance regardless of its potential lack of credence.
 
For most people its a little tittalating to see 2 women swapping spit....When 2 guys do it you might see a whole different reaction........

I dunno Navy....you always seem to be overly intrigued by it.
 
Still talkin' about the lesbo's suckin' face...move on already.
 
How about you stop being an idiot and GTFO?

I'm sorry, did I offend you? Pay my mortgage and I'll listen to what you say, otherwise, bug-off, I'm entitled to my opinion and in my opinion it's nothing more than sanctified porn..
 
I'm sorry, did I offend you? Pay my mortgage and I'll listen to what you say, otherwise, bug-off, I'm entitled to my opinion and in my opinion it's nothing more than sanctified porn..

Your such a hypocrite.
 
Sigh.

My deal is that the photo-op was just that, a posed pic that was trumpeted as some sort of celebration. Of what? A pointedly PC photo-op?
 
Sigh.

My deal is that the photo-op was just that, a posed pic that was trumpeted as some sort of celebration. Of what? A pointedly PC photo-op?

It's more of celebrating soldiers coming home but whatever.
 
It's more of celebrating soldiers coming home but whatever.

The article states:

"It's something new, that's for sure," Gaeta told reporters after the kiss.

"It's nice to be able to be myself. It's been a long time coming."

That is celebrating a lesbian kiss by someone who came home in a uniform. The article is not about about celebrating soldiers coming home.
 
Yes it is.

But... it can't be about soldiers celebrating, that's too much like facts. And if I have to deal with facts then that means I have to live in reality and we all know that reality sucks. [/sarcasm]
 
That is celebrating a lesbian kiss by someone who came home in a uniform. The article is not about about celebrating soldiers coming home.

Frankly it doesn't matter one iota to me if you think this was significant or not. It was significant to many (including myself), so if you don't like it, don't read it.

I have been a gay rights activist for many years. I have friends and some family members that are gay and this indeed is significant to all of us. To each their own.
 
Still talkin' about the lesbo's suckin' face...move on already.

No, we will not move on. If you don't like it, then either stay out of this thread, ignore it, or deal with it. Either way, go pound sand.
 
But... it can't be about soldiers celebrating, that's too much like facts. And if I have to deal with facts then that means I have to live in reality and we all know that reality sucks. [/sarcasm]

It is about the sensationalization of a lesbian kiss that happen to be in uniform. I am not against it, but be honest.
 
Frankly it doesn't matter one iota to me if you think this was significant or not. It was significant to many (including myself), so if you don't like it, don't read it.

I have been a gay rights activist for many years. I have friends and some family members that are gay and this indeed is significant to all of us. To each their own.


Where did I say it wasn't significant? Thanks for trying to label that on me.
 
It is about the sensationalization of a lesbian kiss that happen to be in uniform. I am not against it, but be honest.

Most likely it was. And it was significant to many. So what? If people don't like to see it, they don't have to read the paper.
 
Where did I say it wasn't significant? Thanks for trying to label that on me.

Where did I say you thought it wasn't significant. I even stated I don't care if you think this WAS significant or NOT.

I didn't label you one way or the other.
 
Back
Top Bottom