I dunno. There are a ton. It's been all over the news for a week or so. If there is something specific that you don't find in there that you want a source for, and you can't find it googling, let me know and I'll look more.
Per you links:
‘
Senate Republicans say Mr. Boehner had signed off on the two-month extension’
Review & Outlook: The GOP's Payroll Tax Fiasco - WSJ.com
‘
the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page calls into question whether Boehner will be Speaker come 2013 and is saying that he reportedly “flipped” his position on the proposal within 24 hours, following a revolt by his members’ a link to the above article, no new source.
John Boehner’s leadership mess on the payroll tax cut - Post Leadership - The Washington Post
Believing that Boehner was on board and that the House would easily approve the extension…
But Boehner has adamantly denied that he backed the McConnell-Reid deal.
Mitch McConnell?s silence leaves John Boehner out on a limb - Manu Raju and John Bresnahan - POLITICO.com
Based on the Politico link, the assertion made in #41 was supported. I have Googled this and found no evidence that support the assertions you made (you made them, why should I source them):
1. McConnell, Reid and Boehner entered negotiations after that bill went to the senate.
2. Boehner gave his proxy to McConnell, meaning that he would let McConnell negotiate on his behalf.
3. Boehner publicly announced that he would abide by whatever they decided.
4. When it came out that it might just be for 2 months, he said that was fine
5. When the senate …agreed on a deal, everybody, including Boehner said it was great …
6. Supposedly Boehner gave McConnell a high five right after the meeting
7. Then, right after the senate left, Boehner was approached by the tea party caucus who apparently threatened an all out revolt.
So the 'Senate Republicans said' or 'The Wall Street Journel is saying' trumps Boehner speaking for himself?