- Joined
- Jul 9, 2008
- Messages
- 30,275
- Reaction score
- 17,796
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Ok...... Whats your point here??
The two of you are over-thinking my comment. Perhaps you guys were still in defensive mode.
Last edited:
Ok...... Whats your point here??
The two of you are over-thinking my comment. Perhaps you guys were still in defensive mode.
No your comment is idiotic
No your comment is idiotic
The difference is Fiddy may have a few posts that are idiotic, versus all of your posts which are idiotic.
Another problem, you can't seem to recognize idiotic posts probably because you post them every day... therefore your credibility on idiotic posts is crawling in negative numbers. Just sayin'...
Not really. I was just making conversation. It's not going so well over there in China, despite some effort. If you find that idiotic, meh.
See, you're not the tough guy you're portraying yourself as... don't be too hard on yourself. Anyone can make a mistake... over... and over.... and over.....
Moderator's Warning: |
Stick the topic. Future posts attacking each other will result in an infraction and a thread ban. |
This is the same publication that elected Hitler and Stalin man of the year. A lot to be proud of there. Can't wait to make that list. :lamo
This is the same publication that elected Hitler and Stalin man of the year. A lot to be proud of there. Can't wait to make that list. :lamo
The award isn't always handed out to a "positive" person(s), it is also given to "negative" person(s). I think "The Protester" is very vauge and open to interpretation as to whether it is good or bad. Whether one agrees with OWS, the Arab Spring, the Tea Party or any other movement, doesn't diminish it's influence around the globe in the past couple of years, more so this year. While I may disagree with Time's "angle" so to speak, I felt it was a fitting "Person of the Year" and find no fault with it. Only the truly partisan from either side would see this as anything other than fitting IMO.
Tea Party protest = bad
OWS protest = good
Now you know Hugh how they should be rated. :2razz:
The award isn't always handed out to a "positive" person(s), it is also given to "negative" person(s). I think "The Protester" is very vauge and open to interpretation as to whether it is good or bad. Whether one agrees with OWS, the Arab Spring, the Tea Party or any other movement, doesn't diminish it's influence around the globe in the past couple of years, more so this year. While I may disagree with Time's "angle" so to speak, I felt it was a fitting "Person of the Year" and find no fault with it. Only the truly partisan from either side would see this as anything other than fitting IMO.
Hitler was man of the year in 1938.
Hitler was man of the year in 1938.
Hitler was man of the year in 1938.
Every year this comes up and every year we have to explain to everyone that this is not a popularity contest and the winner does not always represnt the best of our race, I almost wish Time would stop doing it so I would not have to explain this to people every year
Other way around big guy....
I'm still waiting on your point.
I know that, Thunder was a bit confused, big boy.
Every year this comes up and every year we have to explain to everyone that this is not a popularity contest and the winner does not always represnt the best of our race, I almost wish Time would stop doing it so I would not have to explain this to people every year