• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama at Fort Bragg to troops: 'Welcome home!'

radcen

Phonetic Mnemonic ©
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
34,817
Reaction score
18,576
Location
Look to your right... I'm that guy.
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
What I want to know is, are the troops actually coming home in truthful and literal sense, or are they just moving across the border to a neighboring country? The wording of this article (and every other that I have seen) is carefully worded to give as positive a spin as possible, but doesn't actually come right out and say which.

Officially transferring the flag and leaving the country do not necessarily add up to coming home.
 
I thought his speech to the troops was pretty good. Normally I am not impressed, but this one was actually pretty good. His line about how we left the country made me proud that I served.
 
More PR crap... similar to Bush's victory speech on the aircraft carrier.

Troops that haven't be re-allocated to other fronts have been brought home to prepare for potential civil unrest. Their job is not over.

But... people are ignorant and will take Obama's word for it.
 
More PR crap... similar to Bush's victory speech on the aircraft carrier.

Troops that haven't be re-allocated to other fronts have been brought home to prepare for potential civil unrest. Their job is not over.

But... people are ignorant and will take Obama's word for it.

you make no sense. of course their job isn't over, they have to serve what they signed up for.
 
It seems that there will be at the very least fewer there. That is good. We are building a huge new and very expensive embassy of some sort there though so we aren't "leaving".
 
It is pretty rare to do back to back deployments. Will they deploy again? Depends on how much longer they serve. Will they get time in the US for training and recovery? Almost certainly. With Iraq being over, one of the benefits is hopefully a little longer between deployments, which should help retention.
 
More PR crap... similar to Bush's victory speech on the aircraft carrier.

Troops that haven't be re-allocated to other fronts have been brought home to prepare for potential civil unrest. Their job is not over.

But... people are ignorant and will take Obama's word for it.
I hope you will educate yourself on the truth about the "Mission Accomplished" banner, and not continue in ignorance over it.
 
What I want to know is, are the troops actually coming home in truthful and literal sense, or are they just moving across the border to a neighboring country?.....

only 4,000 will remain in Kuwait. the VAST majority of troops that were in Iraq 3 years ago, are now home.

the war is over. :)
 
I hope you will educate yourself on the truth about the "Mission Accomplished" banner, and not continue in ignorance over it.

Of all the stuff in the post you quoted, you went for that aspect? The "prepare for civil unrest" part was my favorite nonsense.
 
only 4,000 will remain in Kuwait. the VAST majority of troops that were in Iraq 3 years ago, are now home.

the war is over. :)

Damn straight. I'm starting to get more Ron Paul'ish. We can't afford to maintain troops in a country for 50 years after we are attacked by that country. We should go in, kill the dictator, establish a democracy and get out. If people don't want to establish a democracy then just bomb the existing government into the 8th century. Then leave.

If we are attacked, unleash the full force of the USA. But either occupy it and call it a 51st state, (or in Obama's case, the 58th state) or level the existing gov't and then get out. This nation building crap has gotta go. Our own nation is falling apart while we spend money we're having to borrow to rebuild other nations who are hostile towards us.

I supported Bush 1's first war which he left unfinished and I supported his son finishing the job. I supported the war in Afghanistan. But 10 years is enough. Either call it part of the USA or GTFO. (I shouldn't have to explain what that acronym means.)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom