• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama: Solving Euro Crisis of ‘Huge Importance’

Germany saved itself by responsible government. Unfortunately for Germany they are tied into the Euro, so now as the only real financially solvent government they are being begged to save everyone else. Problem with saving everyone else is everyone else isnt willing to do the hard work at home, which means Germany is going to likely be sucked down with the rest of them.

So you're a fan of Germany's social democracy? I'm surprised.
 
Germany saved itself by responsible government." Unfortunately for Germany they are tied into the Euro, so now as the only real financially solvent government they are being begged to save everyone else. Problem with saving everyone else is everyone else isnt willing to do the hard work at home, which means Germany is going to likely be sucked down with the rest of them.

I would change your first sentence to "Germany saved itself with it's industrious people. If I were Germany, I wouldn't put up with the slackers any longer and kick them out. Germany is willing to bail them out if they can pass modest austerity measures. They can't even do that and in response, they riot in the streets and depict Angelo Merkel as Adolf Hitler. I would say good riddance.

Welcome, once again, to a Europe run by Germans. Nigel Farage puts it pretty harshly:



Hell this was in MARCH 2010
 
??? The reforms that are required to save the Euro Germany is firmly opposed to.

Can you link to some of these? I am not as well versed in the specifics as I should be. All I know is that the Germans are opposed to balance sheet expansion by the ECB which is quite justified given their history with inflation and statutes that were written when the ECB was setup to prevent this very type of thing from happening.
 
Germany is saddled with much responsibility to resolve the problems of the less successful European states, but let's not forget that much of Germany's prosperity is also attributable to its export economy and the benefits it received from the Euro and Eurozone free trade policies.
 
Can you link to some of these? I am not as well versed in the specifics as I should be. All I know is that the Germans are opposed to balance sheet expansion by the ECB which is quite justified given their history with inflation and statutes that were written when the ECB was setup to prevent this very type of thing from happening.

You are correct on Germany's position and the reason why the ECB is acting the way it is. However, the ECB's recent actions have been at the heart of the problem. The economist has done a very good job covering the euro crisis in my opinion.

There are some good links on this page. Europe | The Economist

Also, its a blog, but this blog has done a pretty good job following the euro crisis:

The euro crisis: Who killed the euro zone? | The Economist
 
Germany is saddled with much responsibility to resolve the problems of the less successful European states, but let's not forget that much of Germany's prosperity is also attributable to its export economy and the benefits it received from the Euro and Eurozone free trade policies.

So you're a fan of free trade? I'm surprised.
 
Germany does not have the ability to solve Europe's problems.

Yes it does... Europe can solve its so called problems very easily, but Germany is against the method because of their historical issues with the method.
 
And I thought Europe solved this problem many times over already. They were all patting themselves on the back not long ago.

No, because those that CAUSED the problems are still in control over the economy, and those money junkies won't be happy until they've got ALL the money.

The Europeans shouldn't one read dime, unless they pass drastic austerity measures.

Wanna raise my taxes, just so they don't have to cut their out of control spending? Not with my mother****ing money, they won't.

Austerity CANNOT work. It's not meant to work.

Oh, and it's only a matter of time before they start talking about American austerity.
 
Yes it does... Europe can solve its so called problems very easily, but Germany is against the method because of their historical issues with the method.

Uh huh. It has nothing to do with the fact the EU is imploding in on itself, it's all those damn dirty KRAUTS!

Here's a hint folks, THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO TO SAVE EUROPE.
 
So you're a fan of Germany's social democracy? I'm surprised.

i'm certainly a fan of their decision to balance their budget, limiting deficits to less than a single percentage point of GDP.
 
Can you link to some of these? I am not as well versed in the specifics as I should be. All I know is that the Germans are opposed to balance sheet expansion by the ECB which is quite justified given their history with inflation and statutes that were written when the ECB was setup to prevent this very type of thing from happening.

Printing Euros and buying up countries debt from the banks with these Euros ... up to a point.

The big secret is that the EU economy is 15 trillion euros, but our overall debt is only 9 trillion. Even the Eurozone generates more GDP than it has in debt.. so the idea to fix the whole thing would be too pool resources and have the ECB assume the debt as a real national bank and relive the debt via the printing presses. Now that would of course cause inflation but considering the inflation rate in most Eurozone countries is low, then most economists state that the inflation created via the printing presses would not be a problem.

Now the problem is that the ECB is not allowed atm to assume "national bank" like powers according to the treaty, so it would take a treaty change. But there is a legal way of doing it, but it would require the involvement of the IMF and that is not a road that people want to go down just yet.
 
Printing Euros and buying up countries debt from the banks with these Euros ... up to a point.

The big secret is that the EU economy is 15 trillion euros, but our overall debt is only 9 trillion. Even the Eurozone generates more GDP than it has in debt.. so the idea to fix the whole thing would be too pool resources and have the ECB assume the debt as a real national bank and relive the debt via the printing presses. Now that would of course cause inflation but considering the inflation rate in most Eurozone countries is low, then most economists state that the inflation created via the printing presses would not be a problem.

Now the problem is that the ECB is not allowed atm to assume "national bank" like powers according to the treaty, so it would take a treaty change. But there is a legal way of doing it, but it would require the involvement of the IMF and that is not a road that people want to go down just yet.

You mean intentionally cause inflation to prices and deflation in value of the Euro. I understand the concept, it SOUNDS great on paper, never really works in practice.
 
i'm certainly a fan of their decision to balance their budget, limiting deficits to less than a single percentage point of GDP.

Most European governments have on paper this. In fact Spain is looking to implement it in their constitution.. and to half a percentage. But there is a huge difference between a piece of paper with ideals on and reality. The German deficit is quite large... but then again everyone has large deficits because we are in a recession.... funny how people and the markets constantly forget that little fact.
 
You mean intentionally cause inflation to prices and deflation in value of the Euro. I understand the concept, it SOUNDS great on paper, never really works in practice.

LOL what the **** do you think the US and UK have been doing since 2008? Ever heard of Quantitative easing?

Difference with the US and UK situation and an eventual European one, is that the Eurozone is already cutting big time in their budgets, where as the US and UK are doing jack****. It would most likely work in Europe simply because the issue in Europe according to the markets and so called experts is the banks and the supposed toxic government assets and if you take that equation out of the whole problem then suddenly things change rather dramatically.
 
Last edited:
Printing Euros and buying up countries debt from the banks with these Euros ... up to a point.

The big secret is that the EU economy is 15 trillion euros, but our overall debt is only 9 trillion. Even the Eurozone generates more GDP than it has in debt.. so the idea to fix the whole thing would be too pool resources and have the ECB assume the debt as a real national bank and relive the debt via the printing presses. Now that would of course cause inflation but considering the inflation rate in most Eurozone countries is low, then most economists state that the inflation created via the printing presses would not be a problem.

Now the problem is that the ECB is not allowed atm to assume "national bank" like powers according to the treaty, so it would take a treaty change. But there is a legal way of doing it, but it would require the involvement of the IMF and that is not a road that people want to go down just yet.

Makes sense. There is no arguing that if the ECB decided to print it would helped tremendously. The question is, how do you further integrate the EU while still retaining the national sovereignty of it's countries? If you inflate Greek/Italian debt you devalue the currency of Germany and France. How do you address this issue going forward when welfare states with lower productivity overspend the same currency of fiscally sound states with higher productivity? If you want to think of the EU economy as a whole you would have to ignore sovereignty.

In 2010 (before the chaos of 2011), the EU27 GDP was €12.28 trillion and government debt was €9.82 trillion:

Debt/GDP of the more prominent countries were:

Greece: 143% with deficits of 10.5%
Italy: 119% with deficits of 4.6%
Belgium: 97% with deficits of 4.1%
Ireland: 96% with deficits of 32.4%
Portugal: 93% with deficits of 9.1%
Germany 83% with deficits of 3.3%
France: 82% with deficits of 7%
Spain: 60% with deficits of 9.2%

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/2-26042011-AP/EN/2-26042011-AP-EN.PDF

Of course this was before the chaos in the markets this year. Why should the German people suffer inflation because Greece spent and borrowed like Paris Hilton on a bender?
 
LOL what the **** do you think the US and UK have been doing since 2008? Ever heard of Quantitative easing?

Yes, it's not working out too well. What's your point?
Difference with the US and UK situation and an eventual European one, is that the Eurozone is already cutting big time in their budgets, where as the US and UK are doing jack****. It would most likely work in Europe simply because the issue in Europe according to the markets and so called experts is the banks and the supposed toxic government assets and if you take that equation out of the whole problem then suddenly things change rather dramatically.

Not really.
 
LOL what the **** do you think the US and UK have been doing since 2008? Ever heard of Quantitative easing?

Difference with the US and UK situation and an eventual European one, is that the Eurozone is already cutting big time in their budgets, where as the US and UK are doing jack****. It would most likely work in Europe simply because the issue in Europe according to the markets and so called experts is the banks and the supposed toxic government assets and if you take that equation out of the whole problem then suddenly things change rather dramatically.

But you can't exactly take banks out of the equation. The extent to which you would have to bailout the governments in order to save the banks would be tremendous. And I don't buy the budget cutting. If there is anything I have learned from the US it's that any talks about cutting government spending is all smoke and mirrors. Greece can't even implement the spending cuts necessary to receive the next tranche of their bailout. I do believe that the governments need to cut their spending but wouldn't this destroy the economy in the time of recession? The Left here in America's favorite argument is that you can't cut anything from the federal budget without risking an economic collapse. How are these "cuts" going to help the EU out of recession?

Sarkozy estimates that to bailout the banks you would need around 2.5 trillion euros:

[video]http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000058810[/video]

The ECB can inject the needed €3-5 trillion, but after that concerns about localized episodes of (hyper)inflation, especially now that Kocherlakota has confirmed that the transmission mechanism between bank reserves and inflation may be broken, will be all too justified. In the meantime, Sarkozy on Europe math fail: "The math i'm working with is very simple. In the US banking sector, we had 3 trillion of wholesale funding that needed to be stabilized, got stabilized by the implementation of TARP which saw the US treasury buy $212 billion worth of preferred in the banking sector to stabilize that $3 trillion, give our banks the time to work through hair problem their problem assets. In Europe, that $3 trillion is $30 trillion. so if you multiply the $212 by 10, you get the $2.12 trillion. In my view, the issues on the European banks are bigger than the issues on the books of the US Banks. So if you want to stabilize that $30 trillion and in my view it's not that you want to, it's that you have to, you do not have a choice, you're going to have to be at least at 2.1 trillion and i suspect it may need to be more." Q.E.D. - there, the math wasn't that difficult, was it?

Sarkozy: Europe's "Liquidity Run" Has Begun Because There Is An Unsolvable $30 Trillion Problem | ZeroHedge
 
Last edited:
i'm certainly a fan of their decision to balance their budget, limiting deficits to less than a single percentage point of GDP.

I guess it goes to show that you can be a fiscally responsible capitalist nation and still have national health care, incredibly strong unions, generous uneployment benefits and paternity leave, etc. ... if your'e willing to pay for it.
 
I guess it goes to show that you can be a fiscally responsible capitalist nation and still have national health care, incredibly strong unions, generous uneployment benefits and paternity leave, etc. ... if your'e willing to work for it.

FTFY.

And what the hell is paternity leave?
 
Yes, it's not working out too well. What's your point?

LOL do you even understand what is going on?

The US Federal Reserve has been buying up assets from financial institutions and banks, many of them toxic, so that your banks could become some what healthy. On top of that Fannie and Freddie have been buying up toxic loans from banks further re-leaving them from bad debt (BOA just sold 76 billion dollars worth of toxic assets to Fannie for 500 million). Most of this did not add to the US debt, since the toxic **** the Feds were buying up from newly printed money was bad loans made to the people.

In the European equivalent, the ECB would be buying up state debt and writing it off basically. Not only would the banking sector get much needed cash infusion but also their balance sheets would loose the supposed bad debt. This means not only would the banks become healthy again but the national debt of countries would fall. The drawback is of course inflation, but considering that Eurozone inflation is 2 to 3% then adding a few more % is nothing and can be tackled later on when the markets are more rational plus of course it would give more time for the individual countries to fix their structural problems and get some growth into the economies.

Not really.

So you have no clue about economics.. good to know.
 
"I guess it goes to show that you can be a fiscally responsible capitalist nation and still have national health care, incredibly strong unions, generous uneployment benefits and paternity leave, etc. ... if your'e willing to pay for it."


Fixed it back for you.
 
Alot of good points in this thread have been made...but you have to admit its kind of tacky for us to tell europe to straighten up when our own congress cant agree on which bathroom they are supposed to pee in.
 
"I guess it goes to show that you can be a fiscally responsible capitalist nation and still have national health care, incredibly strong unions, generous uneployment benefits and paternity leave, etc. ... if you're willing to pay for it."

Fixed it back for you again.
 
Alot of good points in this thread have been made...but you have to admit its kind of tacky for us to tell europe to straighten up when our own congress cant agree on which bathroom they are supposed to pee in.

:lol: Agreed. Our Fed has already opened up swap lines with the ECB to assist with liquidity. Let the EU tackle the problem of printing and deficits, there is no reason at all to involve our budgetary process when it is already such a mess.
 
Back
Top Bottom