• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

The problem with Reps/cons is that they are assuming that OWS is made up mostly of Liberals, why the right-wing is too eager to bash OWS. If they would do some research before commenting on any issue they would appear less ignorant. FYI, OWS is mostly made up of Independents (who many times vote Republican, and other times vote Democrat), but FYI, there are also some Republicans represented in OWS. So, before you start feeling so superior, be aware that you are bashing those from your own party.

Dangerous Minds | Occupy Wall Street vs The Tea Party




Ooooh oooh oooooh I can play:


49cf75bc.jpg



Mine is much simpler and quicker to the point. :pimpdaddy:
 
OWS is also a true grass roots movement. They don't have any kind of consensus platform or really any kind of central organization. There's no question that a fair number of kooks have been drawn to the protests.
 
Ooooh oooh oooooh I can play:


49cf75bc.jpg



Mine is much simpler and quicker to the point. :pimpdaddy:

The main difference is that OWS is a true grass roots PROTEST, whereas the Tea Party has organized political rallies.
 
Ooooh oooh oooooh I can play:





Mine is much simpler and quicker to the point. :pimpdaddy:


And mine is more current. 11.07.2011
02:17 pm

Is yours made up by Faux News? I noticed you gave no link.
 
The problem with Reps/cons is that they are assuming that OWS is made up mostly of Liberals, why the right-wing is too eager to bash OWS. If they would do some research before commenting on any issue they would appear less ignorant. FYI, OWS is mostly made up of Independents (who many times vote Republican, and other times vote Democrat), but FYI, there are also some Republicans represented in OWS. So, before you start feeling so superior, be aware that you are bashing those from your own party.

You might have a point if I had claimed that OWS was comprised mostly with liberals. Since I didn't, you wasted a lot of space.
 
The main difference is that OWS is a true grass roots PROTEST, whereas the Tea Party has organized political rallies.

And he gives no link. My guess is it was manufactured by Faux News!
 
And he gives no link. My guess is it was manufactured by Faux News!

And yours was dismissed when it had a heading called "what the politicians are saying" and Michael Moore was quoted.
 
And yours was dismissed when it had a heading called "what the politicians are saying" and Michael Moore was quoted.

And still no link. I think I hit a nerve! Bwahahahaha!
 
You might have a point if I had claimed that OWS was comprised mostly with liberals. Since I didn't, you wasted a lot of space.

Oh, I'm sure a Tea Party lover would say something negative about Republicans/conservatives - Bwahaha! give me a break!

And the same poll says that 31% think the Tea Party has been good thing for America, while only 25% think OWS has.
 
And still no link. I think I hit a nerve! Bwahahahaha!

Anyone that would post something from a web site called Dangerous Minds and then try to make fun of the source of someone else's post doesn't have much standing.
 
So perhaps you pay your fair share. Now we need to go after the greeddy 47% who reap the benefits of massive government without paying for it.

If only the Republican Party had agreed with you during the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts.
 
Oh, I'm sure a Tea Party lover would say something negative about Republicans/conservatives - Bwahaha! give me a break!

No, I won't give you a break when you continue to lie.
 
If only the Republican Party had agreed with you during the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts.

Obama and dems in Congress didn't agree during the 2010 Bush tax cut extension last December.
 
The main difference is that OWS is a true grass roots PROTEST, whereas the Tea Party has organized political rallies.

Grass roots ???? That's a funny one:

On the surface, the "Occupy the Kochs: Guerilla Drive-In" event looked like any other "Occupy" movement protest against the proverbial 1 percent of the population who hold the nation's wealth.

But a confederation of long-established progressive political advocacy groups -- the Campaign for America's Future, Campaign for Community Change, Common Cause, Health Care for America Now and the aptly named Other 98% -- were behind Friday's protest.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/occu...ry?id=14896993&fb_source=message#.Trl9RNQ4o0j
 
Left, right, right, left...most people are somewhere in the middle, perhaps leaning a bit one way or the other depending on the issue. From what I read here, everyone wants to bottle everyone up into two groups when this is not how it is in reality. OWS is a "people" thing. While I personally think they are not all that bright, they have the right to stand in the rain if they wish and protest whatever they want to protest. We, as clear thinking individuals will remain at home, safe and warm and laugh at them on the news. years from now, they will sit back watching the next group of people doing something similar. wall street will remain intact, banks will continue to provide banking, rich people will still be rich and they will have wasted days off their lives for nothing. Have at it...I have better things to do.
 
Anyone that would post something from a web site called Dangerous Minds and then try to make fun of the source of someone else's post doesn't have much standing.

Anyone who would defend a post that provides an article with no link, doesn't have much standing. Besides, it is Forum rules.
 
Anyone who would defend a post that provides an article with no link, doesn't have much standing. Besides, it is Forum rules.

Forum rules ??? Perhaps you could point that out since I don't ever remember seeing such a rule.

You're really reaching now.
 
Forum rules ??? Perhaps you could point that out since I don't ever remember seeing such a rule.



I'm not doing your work for you. You are supposed to read the rules when you sign up. It has to do with copyright material.

You're really reaching now.
It's called Tit for Tat. Google it.
 
OWS is also a true grass roots movement. They don't have any kind of consensus platform or really any kind of central organization. There's no question that a fair number of kooks have been drawn to the protests.


So it's a phish concert without phish....
 
Anyone who would defend a post that provides an article with no link, doesn't have much standing. Besides, it is Forum rules.

You should report me. :ssst:


Let me ask, if i linked to world net daily or newsmax would it be more/less or the same as far as bias?
 
Well, I find withholding an easier way to comply with paying, in these times I can't be sure that I would have a years worth of taxes available at the end of the year...Human nature and all..

j-mac
We should pay for government in the same way we pay for sewage service. Every month the government should send me an itemized bill for the amount of their sewage I consumed (yech). Then I should have to write a check and pay it. Every month. If every person who worked was presented with an itemized bill I can imagine lots of things would change.
 
Well that is certainly good news for Canada and Central America. The rich are always welcome here and are far preferable to the draft dodgers.

And those riots always make for good TV, viewed from the comfort of my living room.

Seems like a winner all around!
Tell me more about Canada.
 
yeah, you're right that most people don't know much about the OWS crowd yet. Just wait until they hear about all the rapes, thefts, drugs, assaults, etc., etc. that has been going on in their "camps".

I'm sure public perception will improve then.....
No one mentioned that Bill Clinton was involved.
 
Back
Top Bottom