I'll take my chances with greedy corporations instead of greedy politicians. [...]
Wow. I thought everyone knew that greedy politicians were the spawn of greedy corporations.
Oh, no doubt. That's WHY they are at wallstreet in the first place. Because to protest the real issue, DC, would mean admitting that they themselves put those bastards into office in the first place. Congressmen don't just walk in and say, "Nice office, I think I'll take this job after all..."
See the above. In many cases, it makes no difference who you put in office; they are nearly all corrupted by the corporate money required to get elected. Note that now, with so-called liberals in office for nearly 3 years, little or nothing has been done by the gov't to reign in, or tax, Wall Street (who, any rational analysis will show, is the true cause of the Great 2008 Recession and the current crippled state of our economy, in concert with a decade or more of Greenspan-led Federal Reserve hands-off cheap money monetary policy). In short, Wall Street
owns DC... not only monetarily but by the preponderance of high level government employees, including Cabinet secretaries, who came directly from Wall Street (revolving door).
Prince John was the government. It's not the Conservatives that pull for more government greed.
As someone else has already noted,
conservatives pull for more corporate greed (a.k.a. deregulated tax-breaked union-busting
laissez faire capitalism)... surely that is without dispute. And as everyone (well, most everyone, it seems) knows, the mega-corporations pretty much own the government.
As to the OP, the stench of propaganda in that poorly-sourced post is strong. Basically not worth a serious comment, but I'd be willing to look at more indepth citations of the claims presented. In that vein, if you go to the link in
the OP :
Report: Fights erupt among Occupy Wall Street protesters and click on the link in that story to get to the
original, actual N.Y. Daily News story, you get:
Interesting how that worked out....
