- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
And yet this is a situation where city ordinances are butting up against First Amendment rights. The judge is following his vow to uphold the constitution.
This is an entirely routine action by judiciary, and is COMPLETELY LEGAL. This is business as usual and how our legal system actually works. I'm sorry if you just really hate these people, Reg, but that's no excuse to trample on due process.
Does that mean this same judge can be called upon to stick up for anyone who is cited under this ordinance, from now until eternity?