• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans block Obama jobs bill

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's another opinion on the President's Jobs plan:

That is a puff piece with without substantiation. It doesn't even tell us why they support it. They just glow about it.
 
That is a puff piece with without substantiation. It doesn't even tell us why they support it. They just glow about it.

Here is why small business is "glowing" about the American jobs act:

Count Them: 5 Tax Benefits of The American Jobs Act

"If you’re a small business owner, the impact of the American Jobs Act may be significant. Here’s an outline of some of the initiatives you should be tracking over the coming months:

1. Payroll tax cuts: The plan cuts the employer share of payroll taxes to 3.1 percent on the first $5 million in wages. According to the White House, this tax cut would benefit the 98 percent of businesses with wages below $5 million. By halving the payroll taxes on the first $5 million, the President hopes to stimulate job growth among smaller companies.

In a U.S. News & World Report article, Todd McCracken, president and CEO of the National Small Business Association, was quoted as saying: “The impact of payroll tax cuts is fairly substantial. It gives [businesses] the cash flow that they need to think about expanding. If they’re thinking about hiring, it’s going to make it more affordable for them in the near term.”

2. Payroll tax holiday: The plan would eliminate the entire 6.2 percent payroll tax on any increase in payroll (for added workers or increased wages) up to $50 million above the prior year.

3. Extend 100 percent expensing into 2012: Companies can fully depreciate certain purchases in the first year (instead of having to amortize these purchases over as long as 20 years). The goal here is to encourage new investment.

4. Tax credits for hiring the long-term unemployed: The plan proposes a $4,000 tax credit for any business that hires an individual who has been unemployed for at least 6 months. And considering that a recent review of job vacancy postings on sites like Monster.com by the New York Times revealed that employers have a strong preference for people who are still employed or just recently laid off, the long-term unemployed need all the help they can get.

5. “Returning Heroes” tax credit for hiring veterans: If a company hires a veteran, the tax credit increases to as much as $5,600, and reaches $9,600 if the veteran became disabled in the course of serving. Unemployment rates among veterans are truly shocking (13.3 percent), so most would agree with the idea of encouraging the private sector to hire or train our veterans.

Of course, since the initial framework of the plan was first revealed, many in the small business community have expressed their disappointment that the plan doesn’t address one of the biggest challenges facing small business success and growth: the difficulty startups and small businesses face in securing credit from banks.

And here’s where one of the more compelling initiatives from the Administration comes in. The White House plans to ask the SEC “to reduce the regulatory burdens on small business capital formation in ways that are consistent with investor protection, including expanding ‘crowdfunding’ opportunities and increasing mini-offerings.”

I know that many are skeptical of Washington’s ability to help the private sector. But the potential to get money flowing to startups and Main Street businesses could be a game changer. Small businesses should closely monitor the progress of the above proposals over the course of the next few months."
Small Business Tax Benefits: American jobs Act



 
Plus, maybe its time to start getting honest and stop calling these job bills. Obama's job bills aren't job bills.

that's not entirely true. they are about saving or supporting his job.
 
After 30 years of being pissed on, I don't think they are falling for it again ~

I'm betting they do. I'll bet not only that, they will defend it. ie: Solyndra, Libya, etc.
 
Here is why small business is "glowing" about the American jobs act:

Count Them: 5 Tax Benefits of The American Jobs Act

"If you’re a small business owner, the impact of the American Jobs Act may be significant. Here’s an outline of some of the initiatives you should be tracking over the coming months:

1. Payroll tax cuts: The plan cuts the employer share of payroll taxes to 3.1 percent on the first $5 million in wages. According to the White House, this tax cut would benefit the 98 percent of businesses with wages below $5 million. By halving the payroll taxes on the first $5 million, the President hopes to stimulate job growth among smaller companies.

How many arguements have we heard about the evils of tax cuts? Except when they are the idea of Obama it seems.

2. Payroll tax holiday: The plan would eliminate the entire 6.2 percent payroll tax on any increase in payroll (for added workers or increased wages) up to $50 million above the prior year.

Again.

3. Extend 100 percent expensing into 2012: Companies can fully depreciate certain purchases in the first year (instead of having to amortize these purchases over as long as 20 years). The goal here is to encourage new investment.

Again.

4. Tax credits for hiring the long-term unemployed: The plan proposes a $4,000 tax credit for any business that hires an individual who has been unemployed for at least 6 months. And considering that a recent review of job vacancy postings on sites like Monster.com by the New York Times revealed that employers have a strong preference for people who are still employed or just recently laid off, the long-term unemployed need all the help they can get.

Again.

5. “Returning Heroes” tax credit for hiring veterans: If a company hires a veteran, the tax credit increases to as much as $5,600, and reaches $9,600 if the veteran became disabled in the course of serving. Unemployment rates among veterans are truly shocking (13.3 percent), so most would agree with the idea of encouraging the private sector to hire or train our veterans.

Again.

It is nice seeing the benefits of tax cuts being promoted by all though. How long do you think this will last? Until November 2012?
 
Here's another opinion on the President's Jobs plan:


The American Small Business Chamber™ of Commerce Calls for Passage of The American Jobs Act of 2011


"The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce™ (The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce) calls for the immediate passage of The American Jobs Act of 2011 and continued actions to build a business climate in which America's small businesses can thrive and fuel job creation.


Do you have idea what this organiztion is and where it came from? It just popped up in September and it has nothing to do with the real Chamber of Commerce.
 
Do you have idea what this organiztion is and where it came from? It just popped up in September and it has nothing to do with the real Chamber of Commerce.

It's right there in Catawba's link.

The ASBCC is an outgrowth of the National Association of Small Business Contractors (NASBC). In September 2011, the NASBC made the leap to broaden the work of our 501(c)(6) trade association and renamed our organization as The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce. Founded in 2004; our headquarters offices are located in Washington, D.C. Contact the ASBCC at 888-861-9290.
 
How many arguements have we heard about the evils of tax cuts? Except when they are the idea of Obama it seems.

"Tax cuts for wealthy, such as those in the Bush tax cuts, are the single “least effective way to spur the economy and reduce unemployment,” according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, because wealthy Americans were more likely to save their money than spend it.

Conversely, payroll tax cuts are one of the most efficient ways to stimulate economic growth, because low- and middle-income earners are more likely to spend their extra cash right away. But this analysis and similar ones from Moody’s and other experts has not disuaded Republicans from their myopic focus on tax cuts for the the wealthy only."

Republicans To Oppose Tax Cut For Working People | ThinkProgress
 
"Tax cuts for wealthy, such as those in the Bush tax cuts, are the single “least effective way to spur the economy and reduce unemployment,” according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, because wealthy Americans were more likely to save their money than spend it.

Conversely, payroll tax cuts are one of the most efficient ways to stimulate economic growth, because low- and middle-income earners are more likely to spend their extra cash right away. But this analysis and similar ones from Moody’s and other experts has not disuaded Republicans from their myopic focus on tax cuts for the the wealthy only."

Republicans To Oppose Tax Cut For Working People | ThinkProgress

Payroll taxes don't cut the taxes of the wealthy?
 
Yale economists agree that large-scale government spending is needed to avoid a larger scale, Japan-style lost decade. Most seem to favor infrastructure spending such as that proposed by President Obama:

U.S. Economy Needs More Federal Spending, Yale Economists Say

Its odd that you are saying this since Obama's stimulus bills have been overwhelmingly focusing on short-run fixes, such as tax cuts and welfare benefits rather than long term investment.
 
Last edited:
Payroll taxes don't cut the taxes of the wealthy?

Most of the super wealthy do not receive the majority of their income through payroll.
 
Most of the super wealthy do not receive the majority of their income through payroll.

But it does cut the taxes the wealthy pay, such as CEO's getting $$$$$ as opposed to stock options, right?
 
But it does cut the taxes the wealthy pay, such as CEO's getting $$$$$ as opposed to stock options, right?

Fractionally compared to investment and estate tax cuts, yes. As Antiderivative documented above: "In 2007, only 6.53% of their income came from wages."

Are you thinking the GOP is willing to give up their tax cuts on investments and estate taxes for payroll tax cuts???
 
Fractionally compared to investment and estate tax cuts, yes. As Antiderivative documented above: "In 2007, only 6.53% of their income came from wages."

Are you thinking the GOP is willing to give up their tax cuts on investments and estate taxes for payroll tax cuts???

That list is only the top 400. A-Rod, C.C. Sabathia, Lebron James (you get the point) Tom Hanks, Johnny Depp (etc) aren't super wealthy?
 
That list is only the top 400. A-Rod, C.C. Sabathia, Lebron James (you get the point) Tom Hanks, Johnny Depp (etc) aren't super wealthy?

Not sure what point you are trying to make. Are you saying you want a special rate for celebrities?

That list of 400 was only for those who received 6.53% of their income from wages. There are many more with income that is primarily from investments. For those, they pay a lesser percentage of their total income in taxes than do the 70% of the country who receive all of their income through wages.

"A recent study shows that over 70 percent of Americans derive their monthly income from an actual W-2 job."
Top 1 Percent Control 42 Percent of Financial Wealth in the U.S. – How Average Americans are Lured into Debt Servitude by Promises of Mega Wealth.
 
Not sure what point you are trying to make. Are you saying you want a special rate for celebrities?

I just wonder why the high fives for a tax break for the rich when generally we hear how evil that idea is.
 
I just wonder why the high fives for a tax break for the rich when generally we hear how evil that idea is.

Its not about being against the rich, at least not for me anyway. It is about maintaining the progression in our tax rates necessary to support a prosperous economy.

Its about returning to progressive tax rates where you don't have 70% of the people in the country that work for a living supporting the lower tax rates for those who make their money primarily from investments.
 
Its not about being against the rich, at least not for me anyway. It is about maintaining the progression in our tax rates necessary to support a prosperous economy.

Its about returning to progressive tax rates where you don't have 70% of the people in the country that work for a living supporting the lower tax rates for those who make their money primarily from investments.

few people who "work for a living" have a higher effective tax rate above those who have billions in investments
 
few people who "work for a living" have a higher effective tax rate above those who have billions in investments

Under the temporary tax cuts, long term investment tax rates were cut to 15%. Therefore, anyone who's income is derived primarily from investment income pays a lower rate of total taxes than wage earners.
 
Its not about being against the rich, at least not for me anyway. It is about maintaining the progression in our tax rates necessary to support a prosperous economy.

Its about returning to progressive tax rates where you don't have 70% of the people in the country that work for a living supporting the lower tax rates for those who make their money primarily from investments.

Then I'd be pissed that Obama has done absolutely nothing about that.
 
Its not about being against the rich, at least not for me anyway. It is about maintaining the progression in our tax rates necessary to support a prosperous economy.

Its about returning to progressive tax rates where you don't have 70% of the people in the country that work for a living supporting the lower tax rates for those who make their money primarily from investments.

You are mis-reading the data. Many of the folks in the top 400 are new to that group....each year there is a large number of people that realize a one time major home run with the sale of a company or large investment position. Are you saying capital gains taxes should skyrocket to achieve your notion of fairness and wealth redistribution? It's ok if you believe that, that perspective is entirely consistent with marxist principles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom