bowerbird
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2009
- Messages
- 1,431
- Reaction score
- 563
- Location
- australia
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
There was no need to ban CFC inhalers. Their emissions were minimal. Banning them has no effect on skin cancer. I disagree that they waited until a suitable replacement was developed. The new inhalers don't work as well.
Saying "Pharma" profits so it's not the government is a smokescreen. It was Clinton who took away the exemption, thus CFC inhalers were banned.
300-500 million people requiring them and the emissions were "minimal"? And somehow it appears that Clinton was in office in 1987!
hint google "Montreal protocol"