• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House Tax Plan Would Ask More of Millionaires

Status
Not open for further replies.
Too Funny Con....YOU are the one who posted the article without actually reading it.....

Just admit your mistake and move on....

I read the article, did you? 49% said they wouldn't be voting for Obama. There is no GOP Candidate so until there is one your post is irrelevant.
 
I read the article, did you? 49% said they wouldn't be voting for Obama. There is no GOP Candidate so until there is one your post is irrelevant.

Give it up Con....you are only displaying your hypocrisy. You obviously jumped the gun and posted a link based on a headline you read without actually reading the content of the article.. When you found out that it doesn't exactly say what you expected, you say...."Well.....anyone who puts much into polls has no credibility"....and then you go right back to the part of the poll that you liked.

Just admit that you messed up....and move on...instead your spinning is simply highlighting your hypocrisy.
 
Give it up Con....you are only displaying your hypocrisy. You obviously jumped the gun and posted a link based on a headline you read without actually reading the content of the article.. When you found out that it doesn't exactly say what you expected, you say...."Well.....anyone who puts much into polls has no credibility"....and then you go right back to the part of the poll that you liked.

Just admit that you messed up....and move on...instead your spinning is simply highlighting your hypocrisy.

I would have thought that you wouldn't have skipped over the first paragraph but apparently you did.

The poll found 49% of registered voters say that they plan to vote against the Democratic president, 36% plan to vote for him and 15% aren’t sure

Rick Perry is irrelevant at this thime but the Obama record isn't. How are things going in California with that 12.9% unemployment?
 
I have faith in the American people that they won't make the same mistake again.

I have faith that when its between them and their voting card, they will make the practical, logical, rational, and common-sense choice.

They will re-elect Obama rather than putting an extremist, bigoted, fundamentalist ideologue into office.
 
Look at GWB. In fact, aren't you one of the ones who gave us that fiasco twice?

GW Bush has a higher rating today than Obama has as people like you bought the rhetoric and ignored the resume. It appears that your feelings trump reality. Your state is a disaster, high unemployment, incredible debt, and number one in welfare. I don't think that igves you a lot of credibility.
 
I would have thought that you wouldn't have skipped over the first paragraph but apparently you did.



Rick Perry is irrelevant at this thime but the Obama record isn't. How are things going in California with that 12.9% unemployment?

Still trying to spin and dodge...eh...Con? Cherry pick the headline again and ignore the actual content of the article that you failed to read. Why can't you just admit that you made a mistake? Oops...I forget....you tend to repeat your same mistakes over and over.....like with GWB.
 
Seems like the American people are waking up. Not looking good for "your" President



Poll: 49% Of Voters Say They're Not For Obama | New York Daily News

Anyone that puts much faith in polls for Obama vs. Republican candidates doesn't have any credibility. Why would anyone vote for Obama with the economic numbers we have today? Without a single GOP Candidate there is no way of knowing how he will fare against that candidate. FACT, 49% say they won't vote for Obama, that is a disaster for you and "your" President

I read the article, did you? 49% said they wouldn't be voting for Obama. There is no GOP Candidate so until there is one your post is irrelevant.

I admit it, I laughed. Any one who puts any faith in polls that you don't like the result of doesn't have any credibility, but if you like the poll result, it should be held up as evidence.
 
Still trying to spin and dodge...eh...Con? Cherry pick the headline again and ignore the actual content of the article that you failed to read. Why can't you just admit that you made a mistake? Oops...I forget....you tend to repeat your same mistakes over and over.....like with GWB.

Results show I didn't make a mistake even though someone from California who has little credibility thinks I did. Better stick to local politics because you aren't very good at national politics. In your world feelings trump actual results and you love the smile and the rhetoric which ignores the actual results. "Your" President has zero leadership skills and results equal to those skills.
 
Results show I didn't make a mistake even though someone from California who has little credibility thinks I did. Better stick to local politics because you aren't very good at national politics. In your world feelings trump actual results and you love the smile and the rhetoric which ignores the actual results. "Your" President has zero leadership skills and results equal to those skills.

Still running from your mistakes I see. Just admit you screwed up....and move on.
 
Results show I didn't make a mistake even though someone from California who has little credibility thinks I did. Better stick to local politics because you aren't very good at national politics. In your world feelings trump actual results and you love the smile and the rhetoric which ignores the actual results. "Your" President has zero leadership skills and results equal to those skills.

And yet he has not done nearly as bad as "your" president. All the name calling in the world will not change that fact.
 
Still running from your mistakes I see. Just admit you screwed up....and move on.

When will you admit yours? Doesn't do any good to look backwards which is all you do as you ignore the present, results matter, but like all liberals you ignore actual results but instead buy rhetoric. what is it in the Obama record that deserves a second term, his 25 million unemployed and under employed? His 1% economic growth? His 4 trillion added to the debt? His class warfare rhetoric? His declining labor force? His rising misery index? Please be specific, this is 2011 and Democrats controlled the Congress since January 2007 yet for some reason you still blame Bush and ignore Obama's contribution.
 
When will you admit yours? Doesn't do any good to look backwards which is all you do as you ignore the present, results matter, but like all liberals you ignore actual results but instead buy rhetoric. what is it in the Obama record that deserves a second term, his 25 million unemployed and under employed? His 1% economic growth? His 4 trillion added to the debt? His class warfare rhetoric? His declining labor force? His rising misery index? Please be specific, this is 2011 and Democrats controlled the Congress since January 2007 yet for some reason you still blame Bush and ignore Obama's contribution.

Spin spin and more spin. Con...you screwed up. Just admit it rather than continue to spin and deflect. You violated a basic rule - Never post without reading the content. Sorry....but you are only making yourself look bad by not just fessing up to it and moving on.
 
Spin spin and more spin. Con...you screwed up. Just admit it rather than continue to spin and deflect. You violated a basic rule - Never post without reading the content. Sorry....but you are only making yourself look bad by not just fessing up to it and moving on.

Run from the Obama results, run, run, run!!
 
The Obama results are in the PAST.

We need to look at the PRESENT!

Agree, what has Obama proposed that makes thing better and improve his results? Taxing Millionaires more? Don't think that is going to put 25 million Americans back to work or collect taxes from the 65 million income earners that aren't paying any FIT? He has been in office 2 1/2 years and all he has done is divide and promote class warfare. How is he going to correct that problem and why would anyone vote for him for a second term?
 
Agree, what has Obama proposed that makes thing better and improve his results? Taxing Millionaires more? Don't think that is going to put 25 million Americans back to work or collect taxes from the 65 million income earners that aren't paying any FIT? He has been in office 2 1/2 years and all he has done is divide and promote class warfare. How is he going to correct that problem and why would anyone vote for him for a second term?

Ok....I won't kick a man when he is down....but seriously Con.....you should just fess up.

BTW....its not class warfare ....Its MATH.....lol. Answer me this Con....why should Warren Buffets secretary pay a higher tax rate than Warren Buffet?

And why did you vote for GWB more than once?
 
Ok....I won't kick a man when he is down....but seriously Con.....you should just fess up.

BTW....its not class warfare ....Its MATH.....lol. Answer me this Con....why should Warren Buffets secretary pay a higher tax rate than Warren Buffet?

And why did you vote for GWB more than once?

There is no proof that Warren Buffet's secretary is paying a lower percentage than Warren Buffet and why does that even bother you? What someone else pays in taxes seems to concern you more than what the govt is doing with those dollars. Keep buying the Obama rhetoric and see how far that gets you in the real world.

It further doesn't matter why I voted for Bush because there is nothing relevant today. I can only change what is happening right now but obviously you like what is going on now. Guess that is liberal compassion.
 
There is no proof that Warren Buffet's secretary is paying a lower percentage than Warren Buffet and why does that even bother you? What someone else pays in taxes seems to concern you more than what the govt is doing with those dollars. Keep buying the Obama rhetoric and see how far that gets you in the real world.

It further doesn't matter why I voted for Bush because there is nothing relevant today. I can only change what is happening right now but obviously you like what is going on now. Guess that is liberal compassion.

Again...nothing but hypocrisy from you Con. You talk about how results matter....and yet you voted for a total failure multiple times. More of the Con "Do as I say, not as I do" rhetoric.
 
Again...nothing but hypocrisy from you Con. You talk about how results matter....and yet you voted for a total failure multiple times. More of the Con "Do as I say, not as I do" rhetoric.

That total failure had better results than Obama on average so you don't know what you are talking about
 
That total failure had better results than Obama on average so you don't know what you are talking about

Sorry...Con....but once again you are wrong. Seeing a pattern here? We were hemorraghing jobs by the thousands under the previous clown. True....Obama hasn't done much to pull us out of the GWB mess....but anyone that pays attention knows who got us into this mess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom