• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Probe surrounding Wis. governor apparently growing

Again, NO ONE HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH A CRIME HERE!

Second, it's only fair to investigate these two (former) employees in state government who have had such close ties to the state's governor if there are questions concerning his campaign and they were part of it.

This may be a small nit-picky type of thing, but Archer is only on medical leave and coming back to a job in state government - would that not make her still an employee of state government?

It seems to me that you are pushing the "former employee" thing to imply some level of guilt, even though both cases have reasonable explanations.
 
Amazing isn't it, liberals lose elections and then try to overturn the results with Alinsky tactics. It really is a shame to see some very good people taken in by the liberal cult today and that is going to make things a lot worse in the future. Results in Wisconsin are turning around due to Walker's actions but good results in Wisconsin are ignored by people with an agenda. We are only hearing one side of the story, the side that the left wants out. As usual when the real results get out they will be ignored as the liberals will be off on some other topic.
what if this turns out to be something major con? what if this happens to land on walker's doorstep? will this still just be the actions of, as you put it, 'people taken in by the liberal cult'???
 
It is quite telling that you have already drawn all these conclusions from an episode which is just in the investigatory stage.
come on now hay, you know that anyone who disagrees with con's viewpoint are nothing but liberal cult members, who have been brainwashed, and who are being made to look foolish.
 
what if this turns out to be something major con? what if this happens to land on walker's doorstep? will this still just be the actions of, as you put it, 'people taken in by the liberal cult'???

Shouldn't you be out with your union thugs waving a baseball bat or cutting some brake lines?
 
Shouldn't you be out with your union thugs waving a baseball bat or cutting some brake lines?
answer my question, what if this turns out to be something major? is it still going to be just the actions of 'people taken in by the liberal cult'? answer me honestly, if you can, i suspect though, that you can't, as it would expose your double standards, expose your hypocrisy, expose your bias.
 
answer my question, what if this turns out to be something major? is it still going to be just the actions of 'people taken in by the liberal cult'? answer me honestly, if you can, i suspect though, that you can't, as it would expose your double standards, expose your hypocrisy, expose your bias.

Why the hypothetical when you are unwilling to discuss the same with Obama investigations? If it turns out to be something major then I would support prosecution. Are you willing to apologize if it isn't?
 
Why the hypothetical when you are unwilling to discuss the same with Obama investigations? If it turns out to be something major then I would support prosecution. Are you willing to apologize if it isn't?
why would i apologize? i havent convicted walker of anything....you on the other hand, are quick to start defending him, without having facts one way or the other, are you going to apologize if he was somehow involved in this?
 
why would i apologize? i havent convicted walker of anything....you on the other hand, are quick to start defending him, without having facts one way or the other, are you going to apologize if he was somehow involved in this?

Why would I apologize, I didn't make the claim against his aides. Is he guilty until proven innocent or innocent until proven guilty? Sounds like the former for many on the left here.
 
Why would I apologize, I didn't make the claim against his aides. Is he guilty until proven innocent or innocent until proven guilty? Sounds like the former for many on the left here.
you immediately jumped to his defense without the facts....you accuse those on the 'left' of deeming walker of being 'guilty' without having the facts, while you yourself , with your defense of him/his aides, are deeming him 'innocent' and the victim of a bunch of 'liberals' out to get him.
 
you immediately jumped to his defense without the facts....you accuse those on the 'left' of deeming walker of being 'guilty' without having the facts, while you yourself , with your defense of him/his aides, are deeming him 'innocent' and the victim of a bunch of 'liberals' out to get him.

What facts? What charges have been brought against Walker? Keep trolling
 
What facts? What charges have been brought against Walker? Keep trolling
no trolling, just a line of reasoning that makes you very uncomfortable....you fail to see your own hypocrisy, you defend him/his aides, without any knowledge, without any proof, without any facts proving, that he is indeed innocent, while accusing 'lefties', 'liberals', 'those on the left', of trying to 'convict' him of something, or of trying to smear him, without any facts.
 
Ahh, yes, Walker was going to bring honesty back to Wisconsin politics. You know, I knew something like this might happen. Why? Because Walker is just another politician, and Republican or Democrat, they are ALL scum bags. When are Republicans and Democrats going to wake up and realize that they've been had?

Article is here.


That entire episode wreaked of corruption from top to bottom.

Walker and the Teabrains in the state legislature were bought and paid for by the Koch bros.
 
Ask Holder.

j-mac

In other words, YOU can't explain it, or don't want to talk about it because the answer is damaging to the partisan narrative you hold dear?
 
no trolling, just a line of reasoning that makes you very uncomfortable....you fail to see your own hypocrisy, you defend him/his aides, without any knowledge, without any proof, without any facts proving, that he is indeed innocent, while accusing 'lefties', 'liberals', 'those on the left', of trying to 'convict' him of something, or of trying to smear him, without any facts.

Ok, let me know when charges are brought against Walker. I am sure I can count on you
 
Shouldn't you be out with your union thugs waving a baseball bat or cutting some brake lines?

Just earlier in this thread you described yourself as a politician that has integrity, honesty, and tact. Then you post garbage like this? You just blew your own credibility out the window.
 
That's an over the top comment, you should apologize. Seriously.

Really? Been paying attention to what is going on in the state of Washington all because of the company not wanting to hire union employees or hiring members of the wrong union? Where is your outrage over the action of those thugs?
 
Just earlier in this thread you described yourself as a politician that has integrity, honesty, and tact. Then you post garbage like this? You just blew your own credibility out the window.

Post where I said I was a politician, period. As far as credibility, doubt that I will ever have any credibility with the liberals in this group or those who cannot admit they are liberals. Not going to lose any sleep over it.
 
Post where I said I was a politician, period. As far as credibility, doubt that I will ever have any credibility with the liberals in this group or those who cannot admit they are liberals. Not going to lose any sleep over it.

My apologies I was wrong, that was councilman. As for credibility you sure as well won't have any posting slanderous and over the top insults like I quoted you. Up to you really. Liberals are not going anywhere and if you want to treat me like the enemy that is up to you.

So far I have seen you do much of what you accuse liberals doing.
 
I disagree. Today we see companies that seem to donate to repubs, repub politicians that do things unpopular with unions, and even news outlets that don't suck up to the administration shut out. While, thugs that loiter outside polling places with clubs, and intimidate voters, and are convicted of such, cases just dropped. This whole administration stinks of corruption.

j-mac

And to think that in another thread, you're arguing in favor of the presumption of evidence, but here in this thread you have already convicted the President and his entire administration

I'm sure Conservative will be criticizing you for convicting the Obama admin without waiting for the trial :lamo
 
If he is charged, will you agree to ban yourself from DP?

Now why would I do that? What happens in Wisconsin seems to bother you and the other pro union people here than it bothers me. I prefer sticking around to watch liberals get their asses handed to them by the electorate in 2012
 
Back
Top Bottom