A bit vague ??? That is putting it mildly, you will really use any bit of information to go after Bush won't you ? One has to wonder if your not on Obama's payroll. I've seen partisan hacks before... . This leads the way .
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB116/pdb8-6-2001.pdf
There is the actual released PDB that you are talking about …. I encourage everyone to read it and lets remember this was given to President Bush August 6 2001 35 days before the attack. I hope anyone reading this sees just how “ a bit vague “ This document given to the president just 35 days before the attack took place …. really is. In My Option only a jerk off a**hol * could even vaguely imply that anyone could have done anything with this PDB
Now on to your feeble attempts of showing where Bush blamed Clinton .. your first, he doesn't name Clinton, he doesn't name a party in our government, in fact the closest thing to naming anyone is . . “T
hey concluded that free societies lacked the courage and character to defend themselves against a determined enemy."
To use your term a “bit vague” Personally .. I'd call it weak assed.
The rest is much the same … Clinton, past administration, democrats, or anyone else for that matter were not even mentioned ….it's pretty plan to see your arguments here are weak … and hold nothing even resembling placing blame at a party, or any administration..... but to a far leaning lefty like yourself .. well . I guess to you they do. That says a lot about your character..............